Comments on: Global Warming 101: Solutions

By: naomi

naomi — Sat, 12 Mar 2011 12:34:19 +0000

gd points

By: harshil

harshil — Sun, 06 Mar 2011 07:10:15 +0000

very gd points

By: Jessica

Jessica — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:54:51 +0000

Please explain to me then how global temps were even higher in the dinosaur days and they obviously didnt have a bigger carbon footprint than we do! explain that!

By: scott

scott — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:36:31 +0000

Dang!

By: wilson

wilson — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:37:13 +0000

I Really enjoyed reading your article, as a matter of fact I find very usefull any kind of argument about this issue. Since the Industrial Revolution we humans have brought to our planet our concept of good living, It has in fact been too good for us but not for our planet. Unless we chance our moral values we some day will destroy our own home.

By: Malthus

Malthus — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:48:18 +0000

The giant elephant, or should I say baby, in the room here is population control.

If we want to control global warming we need to reduce the world population.

This means education, free contraceptives, and pensions, for the majority of the world population.

First world nations are already by and large not growing organically, and, absent immigration, are already shrinking. The issue is to enable the rest of the world to feel secure enough not to need or want lots of kids.

Reducing the number of people is a lot more efficient than reducing the carbon footprint per person.

This is hardly an original idea. It has been stated many times by prominent scientists, but for whatever reason seems to be ignored.

Case in point is the list above. Population reduction would do more for the planet than all of the above solutions combined.

To Save The Planet

Stop Having Babies!

By: scott loveday

scott loveday — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:35:02 +0000

Just look at the sun or full moon when there are clouds passing in front of them and see the colors mainly red and purple more visible with sun glasses for the sun,its visible any time when several clouds are in front of the sun. Safer and easier to look at WITH Sunglasses . There sadly is all the proof you need to know that this is the air we breath and water we drink and the acid rain and polutants that feeds the food we eat.For every action there is an opposite equal reaction .There has to be some sort of impact on all the crap we put in our air not to mention all the nulear bomb testning we did heavly in the sixtys.Man can be so smart and also be so stupid…Dang

By: sunsettommy

sunsettommy — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:38:44 +0000

I thought the blog article was a simple way to highlight the ways that we can do better with what we have.

I also think that environmentalists are stupidly anti-nuclear.They were wrong 30 years ago and they are still stuck on stupid today.

We can do a lot to improve on energy consumption without hurting the use of it for various pursuits.

By: Alabama Roadrunner

Alabama Roadrunner — Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:00:53 +0000

You have presented some sound ideas in ways to improve the situation. Corporate welfare elimination is a great place to start. Additionally, enen in using fossil fuels, how much more productive could new facilities be? The anti-everything crowd needs to wake up and realize that we are in a give-and-take situation, and you cannot find fault with every form of energy production.

By: r j patel

r j patel — Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:53:41 +0000

i believe that the big plantation drive must be taken by school children ,teachers,ngos ,religious institutions and the each individuals not depending only on goverment,as we have started "vrukshnarayan katha" with the blessing of the GODESS AMBAJI..from the "arasuri ambaji devshan trust",,,,ambaji gujarat.india.

we give messege of massive plantation to every one who visits the temple.