<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Christy/Schlesinger Debate, Part II</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/16/christyschlesinger-debate-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/16/christyschlesinger-debate-part-ii/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: S.E. Hendriksen</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/16/christyschlesinger-debate-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-26579</link> <dc:creator>S.E. Hendriksen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:00:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=3243#comment-26579</guid> <description>How many of the lead authors and authors was actually &#039;authors&#039;? 1,2 ot 10 % ???? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many of the lead authors and authors was actually &#039;authors&#039;?</p><p>1,2 ot 10 % ????</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dennis Baltuskonis</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/16/christyschlesinger-debate-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-26572</link> <dc:creator>Dennis Baltuskonis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:00:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=3243#comment-26572</guid> <description>Very good!  These types of questions need to be aired publicly because they really EXPOSE the predjudicies of the AGW alarmists crowd. Another good question would be something like; &quot;Please tell us which precise piece of scientific evidence, when you heard it, convinced YOU that &quot;man-made global warming&quot; (or whatever name you wisk to give it) was REAL? Their answer, since no undisputed evidence FOR the AGW THEORY has been found, should be quite telling. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good!  These types of questions need to be aired publicly because they really EXPOSE the predjudicies of the AGW alarmists crowd.</p><p>Another good question would be something like; &quot;Please tell us which precise piece of scientific evidence, when you heard it, convinced YOU that &quot;man-made global warming&quot; (or whatever name you wisk to give it) was REAL?</p><p>Their answer, since no undisputed evidence FOR the AGW THEORY has been found, should be quite telling.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Only 20% of IPCC Scientists Deal with Climate &#171; An Honest Climate Debate</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/16/christyschlesinger-debate-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-26570</link> <dc:creator>Only 20% of IPCC Scientists Deal with Climate &#171; An Honest Climate Debate</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:06:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=3243#comment-26570</guid> <description>[...] GlobalWarming.org: ‘Christy/Schlesinger Debate, Part II’ [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GlobalWarming.org: ‘Christy/Schlesinger Debate, Part II’ [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: IPCC - 80 percent of its members where not climate scientists &#171; UD/RK Samhälls Debatt</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/16/christyschlesinger-debate-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-26558</link> <dc:creator>IPCC - 80 percent of its members where not climate scientists &#171; UD/RK Samhälls Debatt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:11:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=3243#comment-26558</guid> <description>[...] http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/16/christyschlesinger-debate-part-ii/ [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/16/christyschlesinger-debate-part-ii/" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/16/christyschlesinger-debate-part-ii/</a> [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.944 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 273/277 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-14 00:08:57 --