<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Drill, Baby, Drill! (To Save the Environment)</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/17/drill-baby-drill-to-save-the-environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/17/drill-baby-drill-to-save-the-environment/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Bob R Geologist, Tuc</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/17/drill-baby-drill-to-save-the-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-26581</link> <dc:creator>Bob R Geologist, Tuc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:46:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=3265#comment-26581</guid> <description>This whole AGW nonsense can be traced back to the compulsion Greens have to blame mankind for disturbing the natural condition of the Earth. Their idea is that, if left to its own devices, the Earth would produce a perfect habitat for us. They have no time sense at all beyond the human calendar. The realities are that the Earth is just a tiny part of the cosmos and thus is subject to the laws of nature. Geology is all about deciphering these laws and the fact that Earth is controlled by cosmic processes, stability is impossible. The Earth is always changing, we call it Gelogic Processes that are slow and inexorable. Climate is but one of many and the idea that man can control them is most presumptuous. We have been in an interglacial period for the past 14,000 years, the Holocene. The many weather changes of warming and cooling have been documented by studies of several ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica showing that there is nothing abnormal in our present 150 year warmup since end of &quot;The Little Ice Age.&quot; The proof that we are in an unprecedented warming is a deliberate lie to frighten people into believing the preposterous claims of Anthropomorphic Global Warming and are readily apparent in scientific studies of past climates. No one can assure us that we are going to be in a warmer climate or to fall back into another 100,000 year period of continental glaciation, which would be far worse for mankind. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole AGW nonsense can be traced back to the compulsion Greens have to blame mankind for disturbing the natural condition of the Earth. Their idea is that, if left to its own devices, the Earth would produce a perfect habitat for us. They have no time sense at all beyond the human calendar. The realities are that the Earth is just a tiny part of the cosmos and thus is subject to the laws of nature. Geology is all about deciphering these laws and the fact that Earth is controlled by cosmic processes, stability is impossible. The Earth is always changing, we call it Gelogic Processes that are slow and inexorable. Climate is but one of many and the idea that man can control them is most presumptuous.</p><p>We have been in an interglacial period for the past 14,000 years, the Holocene. The many weather changes of warming and cooling have been documented by studies of several ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica showing that there is nothing abnormal in our present 150 year warmup since end of &quot;The Little Ice Age.&quot; The proof that we are in an unprecedented warming is a deliberate lie to frighten people into believing the preposterous claims of Anthropomorphic Global Warming and are readily apparent in scientific studies of past climates. No one can assure us that we are going to be in a warmer climate or to fall back into another 100,000 year period of continental glaciation, which would be far worse for mankind.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Geophys55</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/17/drill-baby-drill-to-save-the-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-26574</link> <dc:creator>Geophys55</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:20:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=3265#comment-26574</guid> <description>Mr. Yeatman, I&#039;ve tried before to explain thisto people (but they don&#039;t want to learn): Misconception #10. Any oil in the ocean is from a spill. Come and listen to my story &#8216;bout a man named Rudesindo Cantarall.   In 1971, this fisherman complained to PEMEX (the National Oil Company of Mexico) about thick tar that was fouling his nets in the Bay of Campeche.  The oil people were puzzled, having no pipelines or drill rigs in that area.  He took some PEMEX geologists to the spot where it was happening.  What they found was natural seepage from what turned out to be one of the largest offshore oil fields ever found.  It became the economic heart of Mexico&#8217;s oil industry is only now waning.  Alas, Rudesindo did not retire to Acapulco Bay amongst swimin&#8217; pools and movie stars, as we might like to believe.  He died in 1997 in poverty and obscurity. Seeps of petroleum happen anywhere petroleum occurs in abundance.    It is not in the least surprising that someone would decide to drill where seeps occur. Venezuela is replete with such oil seepage and natural gas eruptions.  I myself have seen these with my own eyes.  In the Gulf of Mexico oil seeps out at a rate equal to 2 &#8220;ExxonValdez&#8217;s&#8221; per year (Science Daily). So, when you see an oil platform and blame it for the tar balls on the beach, you have quite probably  put cause and effect backward. Petroleum, after all is a naturally occurring substance that sometimes comes to the surface, as at the La Brea tar pits, to pick a well-known example </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Yeatman,</p><p> I&#039;ve tried before to explain thisto people (but they don&#039;t want to learn):</p><p>Misconception #10. Any oil in the ocean is from a spill.</p><p>Come and listen to my story &lsquo;bout a man named Rudesindo Cantarall.   In 1971, this fisherman complained to PEMEX (the National Oil Company of Mexico) about thick tar that was fouling his nets in the Bay of Campeche.  The oil people were puzzled, having no pipelines or drill rigs in that area.  He took some PEMEX geologists to the spot where it was happening.  What they found was natural seepage from what turned out to be one of the largest offshore oil fields ever found.  It became the economic heart of Mexico&rsquo;s oil industry is only now waning.  Alas, Rudesindo did not retire to Acapulco Bay amongst swimin&rsquo; pools and movie stars, as we might like to believe.  He died in 1997 in poverty and obscurity.</p><p>Seeps of petroleum happen anywhere petroleum occurs in abundance.    It is not in the least surprising that someone would decide to drill where seeps occur. Venezuela is replete with such oil seepage and natural gas eruptions.  I myself have seen these with my own eyes.  In the Gulf of Mexico oil seeps out at a rate equal to 2 &ldquo;ExxonValdez&rsquo;s&rdquo; per year (Science Daily).</p><p> So, when you see an oil platform and blame it for the tar balls on the beach, you have quite probably  put cause and effect backward. Petroleum, after all is a naturally occurring substance that sometimes comes to the surface, as at the La Brea tar pits, to pick a well-known example</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/8 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 239/243 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-02-12 18:23:02 --