Singer documents thoroughly the nonsense of enviro-hypocrites, who exaggerate, lie and then fly around the world to one conference after another, telling everyone else to do as they say not as they do.

The Mann et al. studies were reviewed by two non-scientists, Stephen McIntyre of Toronto and Ross McKitrick from Canada's University of Guelph. They are well versed in statistics and when they asked for the original study date from Mann, it was provided haltingly and incompletely, indicating that no one else had previously requested the data for a peer review in connection with the original publication in Nature.

"The major finding is that the [warming] in the early 15th century exceed[s] any [warming] in the 20th century.

So the Mann report, the hockey stick graph, is fundamentally wrong.

Hello! No need to cut back 80% on carbon dioxide emissions, Al Gore and sheep.

Scary. Do you think that this could eventually lead to population reduction excercises? And I only ask that half jokingly.

Do you realize that this means your very exhalations of breathe (that portion of which is a gas fundamentally necessary to life as we know it) is soon to be considered a crime?

Stand with Carbonicus and continue to call out sheeple and watermelons (green on outside, red on inside). Sun, oceans, water vapor clouds. Compared to these, trace CO2 is a fart in a hurricane.

As Ted Nugent says in his book Ted, White, & Blue, "kill sheeple, make wool, eat mutton. Next".

Rock On.

And I agree 100% with you on the rest of your comments, although I would like to see some sources for the warming and cooling theory that follows the laws of thermodynamics. Sounds interesting, but I would like to research that one.

It makes me wonder how many environmentalists would shoot themselves in the face if Al Gore made a movie called "Bullets Taste Good". But at this point I don't even care. Human's can suffer the consequences of their own stupidity. After years of shouting "Halliburton" conspiracies theories, the same easily-manipulated knuckleheads are going to actively support thinly disguised corporate interests pushing legislation that will significantly compromise our quality of life. Brilliant. How much do you all think the Sierra Club's crack team of policy lawyers costs? Have the enviros ever thought about where that money comes from? I'm sure they think its from donations or selling ganja cookies at protest rallies though in reality it's as dirty and corporate as Halliburton. Funny how people embrace their own ignorance just to feel a false sense of moral superiority.

I have tons of money, education and sense. At the end of the day these policies will bring the sheeple that support them more heartache than me. That will be a last laugh that I will thoroughly enjoy.