When it comes to global warming, dire predictions seem to be all we see or hear. But is the alarmism justified?
In today’s Cato Daily Podcast, climatologists Patrick Michaels explains why the news and information we receive about global warming have become so apocalyptic. According to Michaels, a Cato senior fellow in environmental studies, science itself has become increasingly biased, with warnings of extreme consequences from global warming becoming the norm. That bias is then communicated through the media, who focus on only extreme predictions.
Click here to listen to this insightful commentary. It is likely to change the way you perceive the media’s portrayal of global warming.