<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: NBCC/CRA study estimates Waxman-Markey would reduce employment by 2.3 million jobs in 2015</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/05/21/nbcccra-study-estimates-waxman-markey-would-reduce-employment-by-23-million-jobs-in-2015/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/05/21/nbcccra-study-estimates-waxman-markey-would-reduce-employment-by-23-million-jobs-in-2015/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Dan Fernandes</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/05/21/nbcccra-study-estimates-waxman-markey-would-reduce-employment-by-23-million-jobs-in-2015/comment-page-1/#comment-27633</link> <dc:creator>Dan Fernandes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 22:25:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=13760#comment-27633</guid> <description>The National Black Chamber of Commerce impact estimates are far too small. The more likely impact is quite simple to estimate. We currently spend about 12% of GNP on energy, mostly from fossil fuels. Green energy (mostly solar) is about five times as expensive as current sources, so we will be spending 60% of GNP on energy once we make the conversion. That&#8217;s an extra 48% of GNP that will be sucked up by green energy. You will see the result as higher prices for all things made using energy, which includes just about everything. But that&#8217;s just a minimum impact estimate! Add to that the economic disruption that will be created by the huge energy tax (cap and trade), and the added government control of the economy that will be necessary to make the transition.  Now you are looking at real sacrifice! The Soviet Union economy was 80% waste, and we may approach that situation under carbon rationing. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Black Chamber of Commerce impact estimates are far too small. The more likely impact is quite simple to estimate. We currently spend about 12% of GNP on energy, mostly from fossil fuels. Green energy (mostly solar) is about five times as expensive as current sources, so we will be spending 60% of GNP on energy once we make the conversion. That&rsquo;s an extra 48% of GNP that will be sucked up by green energy. You will see the result as higher prices for all things made using energy, which includes just about everything.</p><p>But that&rsquo;s just a minimum impact estimate! Add to that the economic disruption that will be created by the huge energy tax (cap and trade), and the added government control of the economy that will be necessary to make the transition.  Now you are looking at real sacrifice! The Soviet Union economy was 80% waste, and we may approach that situation under carbon rationing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.031 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 222/226 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-13 23:40:11 --