<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Silences Science: Is This the Change We Were Promised?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/06/30/obama-silences-science-is-this-the-change-we-were-promised/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/06/30/obama-silences-science-is-this-the-change-we-were-promised/</link>
	<description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: capps.b</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/06/30/obama-silences-science-is-this-the-change-we-were-promised/comment-page-1/#comment-28266</link>
		<dc:creator>capps.b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=4156#comment-28266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Large amounts of C02 are said to be a dangerous greenhouse gas that will cause a runaway greenhouse effect. 
 
It is less than 1% of our atmosphere. H2o is a much more significant greenhouse gas, and is unable to be regulated. So they do not make demands for controlling it. 
 
I think the global warming hysteria is a prime example of really bad science. Anyone who has been watching sunspot activity knows that sunspot storms are synonymous with high tempters, and the absence of sunspot activity leads to a general decline in daily tempters. 
 
Has anyone noticed the cooling trend? It is quite apparent. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Large amounts of C02 are said to be a dangerous greenhouse gas that will cause a runaway greenhouse effect.</p>
<p>It is less than 1% of our atmosphere. H2o is a much more significant greenhouse gas, and is unable to be regulated. So they do not make demands for controlling it.</p>
<p>I think the global warming hysteria is a prime example of really bad science. Anyone who has been watching sunspot activity knows that sunspot storms are synonymous with high tempters, and the absence of sunspot activity leads to a general decline in daily tempters.</p>
<p>Has anyone noticed the cooling trend? It is quite apparent. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob R Geologist, Tuc</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/06/30/obama-silences-science-is-this-the-change-we-were-promised/comment-page-1/#comment-28086</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob R Geologist, Tuc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=4156#comment-28086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excessive CO2 is dangerous in coal mines, and has long been recognized as a hazard as it displaces oxygen causing suffocation. It is constantly checked with the use of safety lamps in coal mines today. In the old days canarys were used for this purpose. On the Earth&#039;s surface any amount naturally in the air,(it is not known to have ever reached a level as high as 1%), CO2 is a vital necessity for the growth of plant life. Hot houses raising food plants and flowers often boost the CO2 level to speed up and promote growth of their crops. However, where it has been planned to sequester CO2 produced by power plants in abandoned mines and exhausted oil fields, a permanent hazard is created, especially if near a town. On a calm night, a terrorist coould set off a bomb nea the containment device and smother every one in the community. This happened naturally at an African settlement on a lake shore. The lake suddenly released a considerable amount of stored CO2 in its lake bed, possibly due to a sudden decrease in atmospheric pressure, with disasterous results to the nearby settlement. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excessive CO2 is dangerous in coal mines, and has long been recognized as a hazard as it displaces oxygen causing suffocation. It is constantly checked with the use of safety lamps in coal mines today. In the old days canarys were used for this purpose. On the Earth&#039;s surface any amount naturally in the air,(it is not known to have ever reached a level as high as 1%), CO2 is a vital necessity for the growth of plant life. Hot houses raising food plants and flowers often boost the CO2 level to speed up and promote growth of their crops. However, where it has been planned to sequester CO2 produced by power plants in abandoned mines and exhausted oil fields, a permanent hazard is created, especially if near a town. On a calm night, a terrorist coould set off a bomb nea the containment device and smother every one in the community. This happened naturally at an African settlement on a lake shore. The lake suddenly released a considerable amount of stored CO2 in its lake bed, possibly due to a sudden decrease in atmospheric pressure, with disasterous results to the nearby settlement. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 12/20 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 245/274 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-05-15 20:13:53 by W3 Total Cache --