Comments on: Policy Peril Segment 5: Is the Science Debate “Over”? Updated 08/17/09 http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/08/05/policy-peril-segment-5-is-the-science-debate-%e2%80%9cover%e2%80%9d-updated-081709/ Climate Change News & Analysis Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:41:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: papertigerhttp://www.globalwarming.org/2009/08/05/policy-peril-segment-5-is-the-science-debate-%e2%80%9cover%e2%80%9d-updated-081709/comment-page-1/#comment-28402 papertiger Thu, 06 Aug 2009 01:08:29 +0000 http://www.openmarket.org/?p=17432#comment-28402 I didn't even watch the film this time, because your supporting information was so gripping.We have three overarching theories of natural climate;Lindzen's iris effect, Miskolczi's saturated greenhouse, and Svensmark's comoclimatology.All three have a pretty good argument. How about a grand unification theory to nail down the co2 sensitivity? I didn’t even watch the film this time, because your supporting information was so gripping.

We have three overarching theories of natural climate;

Lindzen’s iris effect, Miskolczi’s saturated greenhouse, and Svensmark’s comoclimatology.

All three have a pretty good argument.
How about a grand unification theory to nail down the co2 sensitivity?

]]>