<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: WashPost buries coldest day in 138 years</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/19/washpost-buries-coldest-day-in-138-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/19/washpost-buries-coldest-day-in-138-years/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Otter</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/19/washpost-buries-coldest-day-in-138-years/comment-page-1/#comment-29857</link> <dc:creator>Otter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:30:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=21055#comment-29857</guid> <description>Well now, it certainly appears that your site is doing a fair job of luring in the agw hysteri&lt;b&gt;cysts&lt;/b&gt;. I wonder how either mikey or morom would explain away how well the sun&#039;s activity is corresponding to the Earth COOLING the last few years.... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well now, it certainly appears that your site is doing a fair job of luring in the agw hysteri<b>cysts</b>.</p><p>I wonder how either mikey or morom would explain away how well the sun&#039;s activity is corresponding to the Earth COOLING the last few years&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: U.R. Amoron</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/19/washpost-buries-coldest-day-in-138-years/comment-page-1/#comment-29839</link> <dc:creator>U.R. Amoron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:26:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=21055#comment-29839</guid> <description>Wake up you fools - Everything you read on this site is the narrow agenda of the wacko right-wingers from the Competitive Enterprise Institute.  They put up this website to try to trick unsuspecting people to believe this has something to do with science. This site has NOTHING TO DO WITH FACTS OR SCIENCE - ONLY THE POLITICAL AGENDA OF THE BACKWARD THINKING STONE CUTTERS. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wake up you fools &#8211; Everything you read on this site is the narrow agenda of the wacko right-wingers from the Competitive Enterprise Institute.  They put up this website to try to trick unsuspecting people to believe this has something to do with science.</p><p>This site has NOTHING TO DO WITH FACTS OR SCIENCE &#8211; ONLY THE POLITICAL AGENDA OF THE BACKWARD THINKING STONE CUTTERS.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/19/washpost-buries-coldest-day-in-138-years/comment-page-1/#comment-29791</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:01:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=21055#comment-29791</guid> <description>The temperature of a single location for one day has nothing to do with the effects of climate change.  If you can&#039;t understand this basic concept, you can&#039;t understand any of the science behind climate change or climatology in general. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The temperature of a single location for one day has nothing</p><p>to do with the effects of climate change.  If you can&#039;t understand this basic concept, you can&#039;t understand any of the science behind</p><p>climate change or climatology in general.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WashPost buries coldest day in 138 years &#124; NW0.eu</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/19/washpost-buries-coldest-day-in-138-years/comment-page-1/#comment-29731</link> <dc:creator>WashPost buries coldest day in 138 years &#124; NW0.eu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:33:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=21055#comment-29731</guid> <description>[...] globalwarming.org Tuesday, Oct 20th, 2009 [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] globalwarming.org Tuesday, Oct 20th, 2009 [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Maxx99</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/19/washpost-buries-coldest-day-in-138-years/comment-page-1/#comment-29656</link> <dc:creator>Maxx99</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:46:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=21055#comment-29656</guid> <description>Thumbs up from my men too, both enjoyed the delicious flavors of the meal. , </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thumbs up from my men too, both enjoyed the delicious flavors of the meal. ,</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew Weiss</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/19/washpost-buries-coldest-day-in-138-years/comment-page-1/#comment-29642</link> <dc:creator>Andrew Weiss</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:31:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=21055#comment-29642</guid> <description>Very clever!  You are comparing media response a suburban station (Dulles Airport) which only had a 45 year record to the official station for Washington, DC (National Airport) that has a 130+ year record.  Do you seriously believe they should both be given the same billing? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very clever!  You are comparing media response a suburban station (Dulles Airport) which only had a 45 year record to the official station for Washington, DC (National Airport) that has a 130+ year record.  Do you seriously believe they should both be given the same billing?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mbabbitt</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/19/washpost-buries-coldest-day-in-138-years/comment-page-1/#comment-29628</link> <dc:creator>mbabbitt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:40:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=21055#comment-29628</guid> <description>Once propagandists so consciously bury such contrary information to the narrative of AGW, we can only conclude that they have lost confidence in their religion. They are now sensitive to being exposed for what they are. Surely, these people are afraid that the gig is up on their position and feelthreatened by a mere record cold day, which this time they didn&#039;t put on page one with the caveat that weather is not climate. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once propagandists so consciously bury such contrary information to the narrative of AGW, we can only conclude that they have lost confidence in their religion. They are now sensitive to being exposed for what they are. Surely, these people are afraid that the gig is up on their position and feelthreatened by a mere record cold day, which this time they didn&#039;t put on page one with the caveat that weather is not climate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: storky</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/19/washpost-buries-coldest-day-in-138-years/comment-page-1/#comment-29623</link> <dc:creator>storky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:19:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=21055#comment-29623</guid> <description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Now, just imagine if October 16 was the warmest in 138 years - where do you think the Post would have placed the article? Surely not buried in obituaries.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; &#160; Rather than speculating, why not SHOW US how they reacted to record high temperatures. If you were able to detect a record low temperature, surely you can use the same algorithm to determine the record high and report what the reaction was. &#160; Show us what the Post&#039;s response was to the following: &#160; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BALTIMORE MD/WASHINGTON DC 0122 AM EDT TUE AUG 11 2009 &#8230;RECORD HIGH TEMPERATURE SET AT WASHINGTON DULLES DC&#8230; &#160; A RECORD HIGH TEMPERATURE OF 97 DEGREES WAS SET AT WASHINGTON DULLES DC TODAY. THIS BREAKS THE OLD RECORD OF 96 SET IN 2001 - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#160; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BALTIMORE MD/WASHINGTON DC 0523 PM EDT TUE AUG 18 2009 &#160; &#8230;RECORD HIGH TEMPERATURE SET AT WASHINGTON DULLES DC&#8230; &#160; A RECORD HIGH TEMPERATURE OF 98 DEGREES WAS SET AT WASHINGTON DULLES DC TODAY. THIS BREAKS THE OLD RECORD OF 97 SET IN 2002. - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#160; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BALTIMORE MD/WASHINGTON DC 0122 AM EDT WED AUG 19 2009 &#160; &#8230;RECORD HIGH TEMPERATURE SET AT WASHINGTON DULLES DC&#8230; &#160; A RECORD HIGH TEMPERATURE OF 98 DEGREES WAS SET AT WASHINGTON DULLES DC TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 2009. THIS BREAKS THE OLD RECORD OF 97 SET IN 2002. - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - - </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&quot;Now, just imagine if October 16 was the warmest in 138 years &#8211; where do you think the Post would have placed the article? Surely not buried in obituaries.&quot;</i></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Rather than speculating, why not SHOW US how they reacted to record high temperatures. If you were able to detect a record low temperature, surely you can use the same algorithm to determine the record high and report what the reaction was.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Show us what the Post&#039;s response was to the following:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>- &ndash; &#8211; &ndash; &#8211; &ndash; -</p><p>NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BALTIMORE MD/WASHINGTON DC</p><p>0122 AM EDT TUE AUG 11 2009</p><p>&hellip;RECORD HIGH TEMPERATURE SET AT WASHINGTON DULLES DC&hellip;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>A RECORD HIGH TEMPERATURE OF 97 DEGREES WAS SET AT WASHINGTON DULLES DC TODAY.</p><p>THIS BREAKS THE OLD RECORD OF 96 SET IN 2001</p><p>- &ndash; &#8211; &ndash; &#8211; &ndash; -</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>- &ndash; &#8211; &ndash; &#8211; &ndash; -</p><p>NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BALTIMORE MD/WASHINGTON DC</p><p>0523 PM EDT TUE AUG 18 2009</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&hellip;RECORD HIGH TEMPERATURE SET AT WASHINGTON DULLES DC&hellip;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>A RECORD HIGH TEMPERATURE OF 98 DEGREES WAS SET AT WASHINGTON DULLES DC TODAY.</p><p>THIS BREAKS THE OLD RECORD OF 97 SET IN 2002.</p><p>- &ndash; &#8211; &ndash; &#8211; &ndash; -</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>- &ndash; &#8211; &ndash; &#8211; &ndash; -</p><p>NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BALTIMORE MD/WASHINGTON DC</p><p>0122 AM EDT WED AUG 19 2009</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&hellip;RECORD HIGH TEMPERATURE SET AT WASHINGTON DULLES DC&hellip;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>A RECORD HIGH TEMPERATURE OF 98 DEGREES WAS SET AT WASHINGTON DULLES DC</p><p>TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 2009. THIS BREAKS THE OLD RECORD OF 97 SET IN</p><p>2002.</p><p>- &ndash; &#8211; &ndash; &#8211; &ndash; &#8211; -</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lord Stansted</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/19/washpost-buries-coldest-day-in-138-years/comment-page-1/#comment-29618</link> <dc:creator>Lord Stansted</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:42:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=21055#comment-29618</guid> <description>You&#039;ve said it! They prefer to give 50-year ahead &quot;climate forecasts&quot; rather than tomorrows&#039; weather, which they always get wrong. The UK Met Office (and the BBC) were even unable to forecast a few hours ahead of The Hurricane that hit southern England in the 1980s. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#039;ve said it! They prefer to give 50-year ahead &quot;climate forecasts&quot; rather than tomorrows&#039; weather, which they always get wrong. The UK Met Office (and the BBC) were even unable to forecast a few hours ahead of The Hurricane that hit southern England in the 1980s.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: J. Byrne</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/19/washpost-buries-coldest-day-in-138-years/comment-page-1/#comment-29616</link> <dc:creator>J. Byrne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:14:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=21055#comment-29616</guid> <description>In the UK that sort of news item would be totally ignored by the BBC and &quot;progressive&quot; press (not just shunted into the shadows). Our own &quot;Met.&#039; Office&quot; is a branch of the global warming industry as well. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the UK that sort of news item would be totally ignored by the BBC and &quot;progressive&quot; press (not just shunted into the shadows). Our own &quot;Met.&#039; Office&quot; is a branch of the global warming industry as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/19 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 376/386 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-02-12 22:33:49 --