<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll shows belief in man-made warming down, but why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/23/poll-shows-belief-in-man-made-warming-down-but-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/23/poll-shows-belief-in-man-made-warming-down-but-why/</link>
	<description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James A. Donald</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/23/poll-shows-belief-in-man-made-warming-down-but-why/comment-page-1/#comment-29685</link>
		<dc:creator>James A. Donald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=21250#comment-29685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this is simply a case that the truth will win in the end.  The evidence for substantial anthropogenic global warming is weak, and this fact is simply becoming more widely known. 
 
We have had increasingly accurate measurements of world temperature since about 1995, with pretty good measurements since 2004, which accuracy is I suspect the main reason that global warming has mysteriously ceased.  The more we look at the pre 2000 data, the bigger the error bars get, so now we know that we do not know whether there was any warming from 1900 to 2000, and we do know that there has not been any warming since 2000. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is simply a case that the truth will win in the end.  The evidence for substantial anthropogenic global warming is weak, and this fact is simply becoming more widely known.</p>
<p>We have had increasingly accurate measurements of world temperature since about 1995, with pretty good measurements since 2004, which accuracy is I suspect the main reason that global warming has mysteriously ceased.  The more we look at the pre 2000 data, the bigger the error bars get, so now we know that we do not know whether there was any warming from 1900 to 2000, and we do know that there has not been any warming since 2000. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob R Geologist, Tuc</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/10/23/poll-shows-belief-in-man-made-warming-down-but-why/comment-page-1/#comment-29682</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob R Geologist, Tuc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=21250#comment-29682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe the truth is beginning to win out. I certainly have written a lot of blogs showing the science behind our position and the total lack of it behind the Global Warmers. I have emphasized the fact that we are still in a glacial climate as long as there is ice in our polar regions, a condition that began about 14 million years ago. I have also noted the absurdity of declaring Polar bears endangered. A climate graph of the Holocene shows we are in the 5th warmup of the present interglacial period. All of them were warmer and lasted longer than our present 700 year warm up. How did the bears survive all these previous warmups? If you want to ruin a Greenie&#039;s day, just ask him. The Green position on Global Warming is  sadly lacking in logic. I am sorry to see so many obviously smart people world wide so confused about perfectly normal climate variations. Climates are a geologic process that respond to as much as a dozen variables from the natural world and the cosmos. It is a conceit of humongous proportions for humans to believe that they can control and stabilize climates. Our Greens have to realize this  
or they are in danger of spending all the money in the world trying to control and stabilize climates. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the truth is beginning to win out. I certainly have written a lot of blogs showing the science behind our position and the total lack of it behind the Global Warmers. I have emphasized the fact that we are still in a glacial climate as long as there is ice in our polar regions, a condition that began about 14 million years ago. I have also noted the absurdity of declaring Polar bears endangered. A climate graph of the Holocene shows we are in the 5th warmup of the present interglacial period. All of them were warmer and lasted longer than our present 700 year warm up. How did the bears survive all these previous warmups? If you want to ruin a Greenie&#039;s day, just ask him. The Green position on Global Warming is  sadly lacking in logic. I am sorry to see so many obviously smart people world wide so confused about perfectly normal climate variations. Climates are a geologic process that respond to as much as a dozen variables from the natural world and the cosmos. It is a conceit of humongous proportions for humans to believe that they can control and stabilize climates. Our Greens have to realize this </p>
<p>or they are in danger of spending all the money in the world trying to control and stabilize climates. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 12/20 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 245/274 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-05-15 20:12:14 by W3 Total Cache --