<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Analyzing the Unanalyzable</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/11/12/analyzing-the-unanalyzable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/11/12/analyzing-the-unanalyzable/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Carbonicus</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/11/12/analyzing-the-unanalyzable/comment-page-1/#comment-29925</link> <dc:creator>Carbonicus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:53:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5024#comment-29925</guid> <description>If there&#039;s anyone in the local media with a shred of journalistic integrity left, please ask Wisconsin voters what they&#039;d rather have for tens of billions of dollars over several decades: no difference in temperatures that can be differentiated from natural climate variability over the next 1000 years, or to get all the contaminated sediments out of the Wisconsin shoreline of Lake Michigan, all the state&#039;s brownfield sites cleaned up, and all the state&#039;s Superfund (and state analogue) sites cleaned up, etc. Because that&#039;s about what we&#039;re talking about here. Duh. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there&#039;s anyone in the local media with a shred of journalistic integrity left, please ask Wisconsin voters what they&#039;d rather have for tens of billions of dollars over several decades: no difference in temperatures that can be differentiated from natural climate variability over the next 1000 years, or to get all the contaminated sediments out of the Wisconsin shoreline of Lake Michigan, all the state&#039;s brownfield sites cleaned up, and all the state&#039;s Superfund (and state analogue) sites cleaned up, etc. Because that&#039;s about what we&#039;re talking about here.</p><p>Duh.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 222/226 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-13 13:26:50 --