<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Crackup of the Global Warming Alarmist Establishment?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/18/the-crackup-of-the-global-warming-alarmist-establishment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/18/the-crackup-of-the-global-warming-alarmist-establishment/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: SithLord</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/18/the-crackup-of-the-global-warming-alarmist-establishment/comment-page-1/#comment-30762</link> <dc:creator>SithLord</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:41:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5295#comment-30762</guid> <description>Dan wrote: &quot;This model predicted the ongoing temperature decline trend. None of the 20 or so models that the IPCC uses do.&quot; Well, for starters the IPCC would have to ADMIT the recent temperature decline, and afaik they are still in full denial. And trying to &quot;hide the decline&quot;, like those hockey team guys. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan wrote: &quot;This model predicted the ongoing temperature decline trend. None of the 20 or so models that the IPCC uses do.&quot;</p><p>Well, for starters the IPCC would have to ADMIT the recent temperature decline, and afaik they are still in full denial.</p><p>And trying to &quot;hide the decline&quot;, like those hockey team guys.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CEI Weekly: CEI at Copenhagen&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/18/the-crackup-of-the-global-warming-alarmist-establishment/comment-page-1/#comment-30662</link> <dc:creator>CEI Weekly: CEI at Copenhagen&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:51:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5295#comment-30662</guid> <description>[...] &#8220;generation greens&#8221; gathering at Copenhagen. Myron Ebell, who also went to Copenhagen, wrote a blog post reflecting on his trip and what he believed to be &#8221;the crackup of the global warming establishment.&#8221; Fran [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;generation greens&#8221; gathering at Copenhagen. Myron Ebell, who also went to Copenhagen, wrote a blog post reflecting on his trip and what he believed to be &#8221;the crackup of the global warming establishment.&#8221; Fran [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan Pangburn</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/18/the-crackup-of-the-global-warming-alarmist-establishment/comment-page-1/#comment-30576</link> <dc:creator>Dan Pangburn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:00:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5295#comment-30576</guid> <description>Without human caused global warming, there is no human caused climate change. A fairly simple model accurately predicts average global temperatures since 1895. Consideration of change to the level of CO2 or any other ghg is not needed. The model, with an eye-opening graph, is presented in the October 16 pdf at &lt;a href=&quot;http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;...&lt;/a&gt;. This model predicted the ongoing temperature decline trend. None of the 20 or so models that the IPCC uses do. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without human caused global warming, there is no human caused climate change.</p><p>A fairly simple model accurately predicts average global temperatures since 1895. Consideration of change to the level of CO2 or any other ghg is not needed. The model, with an eye-opening graph, is presented in the October 16 pdf at <a href="http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&#038;amp" rel="nofollow">http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&#038;amp</a>;&#8230;.</p><p>This model predicted the ongoing temperature decline trend. None of the 20 or so models that the IPCC uses do.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charly</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/18/the-crackup-of-the-global-warming-alarmist-establishment/comment-page-1/#comment-30568</link> <dc:creator>Charly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:45:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5295#comment-30568</guid> <description>In other words, good news for the rest of us. Perhaps time to go back to basics and get the science right this time giving non-AGW (Antropogenic Gullible Warmists) scientists some room to breath. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words, good news for the rest of us. Perhaps time to go back to basics and get the science right this time giving non-AGW (Antropogenic Gullible Warmists) scientists some room to breath.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 273/277 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-13 10:19:46 --