<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Crackup of the Global Warming Alarmist Establishment?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/18/the-crackup-of-the-global-warming-alarmist-establishment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/18/the-crackup-of-the-global-warming-alarmist-establishment/</link>
	<description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 07:59:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SithLord</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/18/the-crackup-of-the-global-warming-alarmist-establishment/comment-page-1/#comment-30762</link>
		<dc:creator>SithLord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5295#comment-30762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan wrote: &quot;This model predicted the ongoing temperature decline trend. None of the 20 or so models that the IPCC uses do.&quot; 
 
Well, for starters the IPCC would have to ADMIT the recent temperature decline, and afaik they are still in full denial. 
 
And trying to &quot;hide the decline&quot;, like those hockey team guys. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan wrote: &quot;This model predicted the ongoing temperature decline trend. None of the 20 or so models that the IPCC uses do.&quot;</p>
<p>Well, for starters the IPCC would have to ADMIT the recent temperature decline, and afaik they are still in full denial.</p>
<p>And trying to &quot;hide the decline&quot;, like those hockey team guys. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CEI Weekly: CEI at Copenhagen&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/18/the-crackup-of-the-global-warming-alarmist-establishment/comment-page-1/#comment-30662</link>
		<dc:creator>CEI Weekly: CEI at Copenhagen&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5295#comment-30662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;generation greens&#8221; gathering at Copenhagen. Myron Ebell, who also went to Copenhagen, wrote a blog post reflecting on his trip and what he believed to be &#8221;the crackup of the global warming establishment.&#8221; Fran [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;generation greens&#8221; gathering at Copenhagen. Myron Ebell, who also went to Copenhagen, wrote a blog post reflecting on his trip and what he believed to be &#8221;the crackup of the global warming establishment.&#8221; Fran [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Pangburn</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/18/the-crackup-of-the-global-warming-alarmist-establishment/comment-page-1/#comment-30576</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Pangburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5295#comment-30576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without human caused global warming, there is no human caused climate change.  
 
A fairly simple model accurately predicts average global temperatures since 1895. Consideration of change to the level of CO2 or any other ghg is not needed. The model, with an eye-opening graph, is presented in the October 16 pdf at &lt;a href=&quot;http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;...&lt;/a&gt;.  
 
This model predicted the ongoing temperature decline trend. None of the 20 or so models that the IPCC uses do. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without human caused global warming, there is no human caused climate change. </p>
<p>A fairly simple model accurately predicts average global temperatures since 1895. Consideration of change to the level of CO2 or any other ghg is not needed. The model, with an eye-opening graph, is presented in the October 16 pdf at <a href="http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&#038;amp" rel="nofollow">http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&#038;amp</a>;&#8230;. </p>
<p>This model predicted the ongoing temperature decline trend. None of the 20 or so models that the IPCC uses do. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charly</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/18/the-crackup-of-the-global-warming-alarmist-establishment/comment-page-1/#comment-30568</link>
		<dc:creator>Charly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5295#comment-30568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In other words, good news for the rest of us. Perhaps time to go back to basics and get the science right this time giving non-AGW (Antropogenic Gullible Warmists) scientists some room to breath. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words, good news for the rest of us. Perhaps time to go back to basics and get the science right this time giving non-AGW (Antropogenic Gullible Warmists) scientists some room to breath. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 12/22 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 279/308 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-05-15 10:59:38 by W3 Total Cache --