<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bring Up a Petition, Then Rule on It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/11/bring-up-a-petition-then-rule-on-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/11/bring-up-a-petition-then-rule-on-it/</link>
	<description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob R Geologist, Tucson, AZ</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/11/bring-up-a-petition-then-rule-on-it/comment-page-1/#comment-32644</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob R Geologist, Tucson, AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5575#comment-32644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Climategate, we have begun to stem the veritable tide of ignorance our green fanatics foisted on a naive populace with dire threats of runaway warming. They never bothered to study the books on the Earth&#039;s climate history in their overbearing egotism that they could force world opinion to do their bidding. Their largest and most expensive ploy was to lure enough venal climate scientists to give credence to their shoddy hypothesis (AGW). What they forgot, there were thousands of retired scientists who, like myself, kept up with their science, all because it was their hold on life, their raison d&#039;etre. The implications of the Kyoto Protocols hit me like a ton of bricks it was so bizarre. I&#039;m sure the rest of my 30,000+ skeptical brethern, still active in their respective disciplines, felt something of the sort. I am satisfied that the true science is heavily weighted with the skeptic point of view and that CEI&#039;s summation of the situation in a report dated last Fall (&#039;09) is that &quot;no one is able to point to a single piece of empirical evidence that man-made CO2 has a significant effect on the global climate.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Climategate, we have begun to stem the veritable tide of ignorance our green fanatics foisted on a naive populace with dire threats of runaway warming. They never bothered to study the books on the Earth&#8217;s climate history in their overbearing egotism that they could force world opinion to do their bidding. Their largest and most expensive ploy was to lure enough venal climate scientists to give credence to their shoddy hypothesis (AGW). What they forgot, there were thousands of retired scientists who, like myself, kept up with their science, all because it was their hold on life, their raison d&#8217;etre. The implications of the Kyoto Protocols hit me like a ton of bricks it was so bizarre. I&#8217;m sure the rest of my 30,000+ skeptical brethern, still active in their respective disciplines, felt something of the sort. I am satisfied that the true science is heavily weighted with the skeptic point of view and that CEI&#8217;s summation of the situation in a report dated last Fall (&#8217;09) is that &#8220;no one is able to point to a single piece of empirical evidence that man-made CO2 has a significant effect on the global climate.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 12/19 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 228/257 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-05-15 18:39:03 by W3 Total Cache --