Comments on: Another Classic Colorado Ballot Initiative http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/26/another-classic-colorado-ballot-initiative/ Climate Change News & Analysis Wed, 15 May 2013 18:01:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: fkl;s http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/26/another-classic-colorado-ballot-initiative/comment-page-1/#comment-32716 fkl;s Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:08:56 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5586#comment-32716 nobody reads this anyway

]]> By: fkl;s http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/26/another-classic-colorado-ballot-initiative/comment-page-1/#comment-32715 fkl;s Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:08:10 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5586#comment-32715 this might be true u never know w/ all of the stuff thats going on!!!

]]> By: Fredo http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/26/another-classic-colorado-ballot-initiative/comment-page-1/#comment-32591 Fredo Sun, 28 Mar 2010 05:56:28 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5586#comment-32591 Oh what's the point. Obviously nobody reads this drivel anyway.

But the obvious rejoinder is that if "rent-seeking" is the problem, then the bigger the industry, the bigger the incentive to meddle in the political process in order to generate income…

just like the trillion-dollar oil industry using this lie-filled Web site to ensure we stay addicted to its products, no matter what the science says.

2008 ExxonMobil profits: $47 BILLION

2008 Saudi Aramco profits: $233 BILLION (wonder how much went to the Bin Ladin family…)

Yeah, I'm real scared Al Gore and a couple of wind farms might make a buck or two… I'd much rather keep sending my dough to Saudi Arabia!

You CEI fools would be smart to watch out with this stupid argument about "rent seeking." As ye sow, so shall ye reap…

]]> By: Norman Yoss http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/26/another-classic-colorado-ballot-initiative/comment-page-1/#comment-32561 Norman Yoss Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:03:24 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5586#comment-32561 In reference to anthropogenic global warming, chack out Science News, March 27, 2010 Issue, page 26, (www.sciencenews.org). Most math supporting the warming models is flawed.

]]>