<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Another Classic Colorado Ballot Initiative</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/26/another-classic-colorado-ballot-initiative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/26/another-classic-colorado-ballot-initiative/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: fkl;s</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/26/another-classic-colorado-ballot-initiative/comment-page-1/#comment-32716</link> <dc:creator>fkl;s</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:08:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5586#comment-32716</guid> <description>nobody reads this anyway </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nobody reads this anyway</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fkl;s</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/26/another-classic-colorado-ballot-initiative/comment-page-1/#comment-32715</link> <dc:creator>fkl;s</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:08:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5586#comment-32715</guid> <description>this might be true u never know w/ all of the stuff thats going on!!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this might be true u never know w/ all of the stuff thats going on!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fredo</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/26/another-classic-colorado-ballot-initiative/comment-page-1/#comment-32591</link> <dc:creator>Fredo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 05:56:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5586#comment-32591</guid> <description>Oh what&#039;s the point. Obviously nobody reads this drivel anyway. But the obvious rejoinder is that if &quot;rent-seeking&quot; is the problem, then the bigger the industry, the bigger the incentive to meddle in the political process in order to generate income... just like the trillion-dollar oil industry using this lie-filled Web site to ensure we stay addicted to its products, no matter what the science says. 2008 ExxonMobil profits: $47 BILLION 2008 Saudi Aramco profits: $233 BILLION (wonder how much went to the Bin Ladin family...) Yeah, I&#039;m real scared Al Gore and a couple of wind farms might make a buck or two... I&#039;d much rather keep sending my dough to Saudi Arabia! You CEI fools would be smart to watch out with this stupid argument about &quot;rent seeking.&quot; As ye sow, so shall ye reap... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh what&#039;s the point. Obviously nobody reads this drivel anyway.</p><p>But the obvious rejoinder is that if &quot;rent-seeking&quot; is the problem, then the bigger the industry, the bigger the incentive to meddle in the political process in order to generate income&#8230;</p><p>just like the trillion-dollar oil industry using this lie-filled Web site to ensure we stay addicted to its products, no matter what the science says.</p><p>2008 ExxonMobil profits: $47 BILLION</p><p>2008 Saudi Aramco profits: $233 BILLION (wonder how much went to the Bin Ladin family&#8230;)</p><p>Yeah, I&#039;m real scared Al Gore and a couple of wind farms might make a buck or two&#8230; I&#039;d much rather keep sending my dough to Saudi Arabia!</p><p>You CEI fools would be smart to watch out with this stupid argument about &quot;rent seeking.&quot; As ye sow, so shall ye reap&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Norman Yoss</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/26/another-classic-colorado-ballot-initiative/comment-page-1/#comment-32561</link> <dc:creator>Norman Yoss</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:03:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5586#comment-32561</guid> <description>In reference to anthropogenic global warming, chack out Science News, March 27, 2010 Issue, page 26, &lt;a href=&quot;http://(www.sciencenews.org)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(www.sciencenews.org)&lt;/a&gt;. Most math supporting the warming models is flawed. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reference to anthropogenic global warming, chack out Science News, March 27, 2010 Issue, page 26, <a href="http://(www.sciencenews.org)" rel="nofollow">(www.sciencenews.org)</a>. Most math supporting the warming models is flawed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 273/277 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-02-12 15:05:29 --