<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Coming Soon: The Auto Purchase Mandate</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/04/01/coming-soon-the-auto-purchase-mandate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/04/01/coming-soon-the-auto-purchase-mandate/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: cbullitt</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/04/01/coming-soon-the-auto-purchase-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-32829</link> <dc:creator>cbullitt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 22:30:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/2010/04/01/coming-soon-the-auto-purchase-mandate/#comment-32829</guid> <description>Yeah. So where&#039;s the @$%&amp;ing lawsuit and federal injunction. This Carbon Come Ponzi scheme by fiat has been signed. Let&#039;s see the EPA defend the CO2 endangerment finding with its &quot;gold standard&quot; proof from the UN IPCC.  Oh wait, Babble Botoxer lied and said the used NASA data. Fine, now that NASA says it&#039;s worse than the CRU data. Tell it to the judge!!! I thought Chris Horner was on this. What&#039;s the hold up? This should have been done before Obama&#039;s signature on the regulation was dry. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. So where&#039;s the @$%&amp;ing lawsuit and federal injunction. This Carbon Come Ponzi scheme by fiat has been signed.</p><p>Let&#039;s see the EPA defend the CO2 endangerment finding with its &quot;gold standard&quot; proof from the UN IPCC.  Oh wait, Babble Botoxer lied and said the used NASA data. Fine, now that NASA says it&#039;s worse than the CRU data. Tell it to the judge!!!</p><p>I thought Chris Horner was on this. What&#039;s the hold up? This should have been done before Obama&#039;s signature on the regulation was dry.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.047 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 222/226 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-13 09:27:47 --