<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Climate Peer-Review Process: Hopelessly Broken</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/04/01/the-climate-peer-review-process-hopelessly-broken/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/04/01/the-climate-peer-review-process-hopelessly-broken/</link>
	<description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 07:59:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/04/01/the-climate-peer-review-process-hopelessly-broken/comment-page-1/#comment-32839</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 08:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=27163#comment-32839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well Mervyn, turning a blind eye is easy of course, given the media&#039;s widespread failure to report these things. When people compliment the British media on this, they must be speaking relatively, because I live in England and can tell you that the TV news still won&#039;t shut up about global warming. 
 
Certain newspapers, particularly the Telegraph, are far more commendable than the rest of the media. But I suspect far more people are influenced by the BBC, who are screaming consensus just as loudly as ever. 
 
I&#039;m not sure what proportion of people are turning a blind eye, how many are stupid and how many are just lying. But I&#039;d say the government is guilty of manslaughter, having ignored extreme weather forecasts for no reason other than that they come from deniers of CO2 driven climate. 
 
&quot;It&#039;s the Sun, stupid,&quot; might be simplistic, and I can see why it annoys a lot of oceanographers and atmospheric scientists. But I can also see why solar physicists are excited, given the extraordinary details they&#039;re able to predict, so far ahead. 
 
Another proportion I&#039;m unsure of is how many of the winter&#039;s road deaths were preventable. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Mervyn, turning a blind eye is easy of course, given the media&#039;s widespread failure to report these things. When people compliment the British media on this, they must be speaking relatively, because I live in England and can tell you that the TV news still won&#039;t shut up about global warming.</p>
<p>Certain newspapers, particularly the Telegraph, are far more commendable than the rest of the media. But I suspect far more people are influenced by the BBC, who are screaming consensus just as loudly as ever.</p>
<p>I&#039;m not sure what proportion of people are turning a blind eye, how many are stupid and how many are just lying. But I&#039;d say the government is guilty of manslaughter, having ignored extreme weather forecasts for no reason other than that they come from deniers of CO2 driven climate.</p>
<p>&quot;It&#039;s the Sun, stupid,&quot; might be simplistic, and I can see why it annoys a lot of oceanographers and atmospheric scientists. But I can also see why solar physicists are excited, given the extraordinary details they&#039;re able to predict, so far ahead.</p>
<p>Another proportion I&#039;m unsure of is how many of the winter&#039;s road deaths were preventable. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mervyn Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/04/01/the-climate-peer-review-process-hopelessly-broken/comment-page-1/#comment-32834</link>
		<dc:creator>Mervyn Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 03:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=27163#comment-32834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no worse form of corruption than moral corruption.  What Ross McKitrick experienced in trying to get his paper published stinks of moral corruption. 
 
What really is troublesome today is the fact that, despite all the adverse revelations about the 2007 IPCC Report, western governments around the world still treat the IPCC Report as the &quot;gold standard&quot; in science.  They remain in a state of denial over all that has been revealed to be wrong with the IPCC and its 2007 report, and they remain true to the theology that CO2 emissions from the burning of fossil fuels is the key driver of catastrophic global warming and climate change... even though there now appears to be common ground that there has been no discernible increase in average global temperature over the last 15 years. 
 
Governments also seem to prefer turning a blind eye to all the latest science that has been contradicting the 2007 IPCC Report.  The only conclusion I can come to is that governments have been determined to regulate CO2 for the purpose of increasing government revenues on the pretext of doing something about global warming, which they still keep telling us is happening, even though it hasn&#039;t been happening for the last 15 years. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no worse form of corruption than moral corruption.  What Ross McKitrick experienced in trying to get his paper published stinks of moral corruption.</p>
<p>What really is troublesome today is the fact that, despite all the adverse revelations about the 2007 IPCC Report, western governments around the world still treat the IPCC Report as the &quot;gold standard&quot; in science.  They remain in a state of denial over all that has been revealed to be wrong with the IPCC and its 2007 report, and they remain true to the theology that CO2 emissions from the burning of fossil fuels is the key driver of catastrophic global warming and climate change&#8230; even though there now appears to be common ground that there has been no discernible increase in average global temperature over the last 15 years.</p>
<p>Governments also seem to prefer turning a blind eye to all the latest science that has been contradicting the 2007 IPCC Report.  The only conclusion I can come to is that governments have been determined to regulate CO2 for the purpose of increasing government revenues on the pretext of doing something about global warming, which they still keep telling us is happening, even though it hasn&#039;t been happening for the last 15 years. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 12/20 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 245/274 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-05-15 10:04:18 by W3 Total Cache --