<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Blowout Prevention Act &#8211; Will Rs Get Buyer’s Remorse? (Modified July 18, 2010)</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/07/16/blowout-prevention-act-will-rs-get-buyer%e2%80%99s-remorse-modified-july-18-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/07/16/blowout-prevention-act-will-rs-get-buyer%e2%80%99s-remorse-modified-july-18-2010/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: GL</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/07/16/blowout-prevention-act-will-rs-get-buyer%e2%80%99s-remorse-modified-july-18-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-36729</link> <dc:creator>GL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 02:28:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=30136#comment-36729</guid> <description>Your article is interesting, especially the last bullet:&quot;Congress in 2007 enacted a Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) requiring refiners to sell 250 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol in 2011. Earlier this week, EPA announced it would reduce the 2011 target to 5 - 17 million gallons per year –  a 94-98% rollback.&quot;If CONGRESS enacted an RFS, why does EPA have the authority to reset the targets?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article is interesting, especially the last bullet:</p><p>&#8220;Congress in 2007 enacted a Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) requiring refiners to sell 250 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol in 2011. Earlier this week, EPA announced it would reduce the 2011 target to 5 &#8211; 17 million gallons per year –  a 94-98% rollback.&#8221;</p><p>If CONGRESS enacted an RFS, why does EPA have the authority to reset the targets?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lava lamp</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/07/16/blowout-prevention-act-will-rs-get-buyer%e2%80%99s-remorse-modified-july-18-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-36144</link> <dc:creator>lava lamp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:39:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=30136#comment-36144</guid> <description>We amaricans should at lest try to stop GLOBAL WARMING instead we use as much power and gas and oil as we can look at what B.P did to the ocean all the fishing famillys are going to go out of business and so is RED LOBSTER and menny more business too because all the fish will die from the oil but what would make me pourd is when my children and my grandchildren are around to a clean and heathy earth.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We amaricans should at lest try to stop GLOBAL WARMING instead we use as much power and gas and oil as we can look at what B.P did to the ocean all the fishing famillys are going to go out of business and so is RED LOBSTER and menny more business too because all the fish will die from the oil but what would make me pourd is when my children and my grandchildren are around to a clean and heathy earth.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/8 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 239/243 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-02-12 23:04:25 --