A recent report by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which has received wide media attention, has come to the conclusion that evidence for anthropogenic global warming is “undeniable.” This has, of course, been seized on by alarmists as confirming that all of their proposed solutions to future warming must therefore be undeniably correct as well. The conclusions of the report are also being used in attempts to try to bury the Climategate scandal of recent months.
Fiona Harvey of the Financial Times reported on this story (reg. req’d.) for the front page of today’s print edition and has the good sense to quote our very own Myron Ebell for a rebuttal:
Sceptics remain unconvinced. Myron Ebell, of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, said: “I think climategate is nowhere near done and people will become more sceptical as they find out more and more about how these conclusions were not based on science but were in fact based on political calculation.”
The repeated use of the term “undeniable” by bloggers and activists commenting on the report is merely the latest attempt by the warmists to claim that there’s nothing more to be said about climate policy – that the debate is over. It’s like a boxer suddenly grabbing the announcer’s microphone after round three, announcing he has won, and telling everyone watching the match to go home. The only trouble with that strategy is that we’re still in the ring – and we’re not going anywhere.
RSS Updates 
RSS E-Mail Updates 
CEI.org
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wy0_SNSM8kg
It is very fine they confessed it. If it is undeniable then it is equivalent of non-falsifiable thus unscientific as the main request for any scientific proposition is it must be falsifiable. If it is not then it is notwithstanding Popper’s conception of science. Every undeniable proposition is a matter of religion and is called a dogma not a scientific hypothesis or a piece of theory.
Comments on this entry are closed.
{ 1 trackback }