<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Election Exegesis: Cap-and-Trade Hurts</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/11/03/election-exegesis-cap-and-trade-hurts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/11/03/election-exegesis-cap-and-trade-hurts/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Dan Pangburn</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/11/03/election-exegesis-cap-and-trade-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-44061</link> <dc:creator>Dan Pangburn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:10:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=6390#comment-44061</guid> <description>Climate Scientists make up scare stories to get money. Politicians believed the scare stories and sent money. It looks like the voters are beginning to realize that the scare stories have been made up. Cap and Tax was a suicidal solution to a non-problem. From 2001 through August 2010 the atmospheric CO2 increased by 21% of the total increase from 1800 to 2001 while the average global temperature has not increased significantly and the trend of the average of the five reporting agencies from 2001 through 2009 is down. The 21% CO2 increase is the significant measurement. As this wide and rapidly growing separation between the rising CO2 level and not-rising temperature continues, more and more people are beginning to realize that maybe they missed something. A simple equation, with inputs of only sunspot number and carbon dioxide level, calculates the average global temperature trends since 1895 with 88% accuracy. See the equation, an eye-opening graph of the results and how they are derived in the pdfs at &lt;a href=&quot;http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;...&lt;/a&gt; (see especially the pdfs made public on 4/10/10 and 6/27/10). The future average global temperature trend that this equation calculates is down. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Climate Scientists make up scare stories to get money.</p><p>Politicians believed the scare stories and sent money.</p><p>It looks like the voters are beginning to realize that the scare stories have been made up.</p><p>Cap and Tax was a suicidal solution to a non-problem.</p><p>From 2001 through August 2010 the atmospheric CO2 increased by 21% of the total increase from 1800 to 2001 while the average global temperature has not increased significantly and the trend of the average of the five reporting agencies from 2001 through 2009 is down. The 21% CO2 increase is the significant measurement.</p><p>As this wide and rapidly growing separation between the rising CO2 level and not-rising temperature continues, more and more people are beginning to realize that maybe they missed something.</p><p>A simple equation, with inputs of only sunspot number and carbon dioxide level, calculates the average global temperature trends since 1895 with 88% accuracy. See the equation, an eye-opening graph of the results and how they are derived in the pdfs at <a href="http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&#038;amp" rel="nofollow">http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&#038;amp</a>;&#8230; (see especially the pdfs made public on 4/10/10 and 6/27/10). The future average global temperature trend that this equation calculates is down.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Present</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/11/03/election-exegesis-cap-and-trade-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-44004</link> <dc:creator>Present</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:15:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=6390#comment-44004</guid> <description>Republican Mike Castle openly stated one of the big causes for losing his primary in Delaware to O&#039;donell was his support for Cap and Trade. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican Mike Castle openly stated one of the big causes for losing his primary in Delaware to O&#039;donell was his support for Cap and Trade.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 243/243 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-02-12 10:54:08 --