<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Supreme Court to Hear Global Warming Nuisance Case: Will the Court Empower Trial Lawyers to &#8216;Enact&#8217; Climate Policy?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/12/08/supreme-court-to-hear-global-warming-nuisance-case-will-the-court-empower-trial-lawyers-to-enact-climate-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/12/08/supreme-court-to-hear-global-warming-nuisance-case-will-the-court-empower-trial-lawyers-to-enact-climate-policy/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Bob Smith</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/12/08/supreme-court-to-hear-global-warming-nuisance-case-will-the-court-empower-trial-lawyers-to-enact-climate-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-49869</link> <dc:creator>Bob Smith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:45:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=6585#comment-49869</guid> <description>It&#039;s too bad the article/editorial begins with &quot;in a victory for industry&quot;.  It would be much better to start with &quot;in a victory for science and reason&quot;, or &quot;in a victory for common sense&quot;.  For better or worse, the public has been negatively conditioned toward &quot;industry&quot;, regardless of the industry.  Since the man-made global warming fraud affects everyone, I think it&#039;s much better to cheer any news regarding debunking of the fraud, or decreased support of the fraud by government, by noting the fraud is/will harm everyone (and that lack of propping up of the fraud will help everyone, not just &quot;industry&quot;) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s too bad the article/editorial begins with &quot;in a victory for industry&quot;.  It would be much better to start with &quot;in a victory for science and reason&quot;, or &quot;in a victory for common sense&quot;.  For better or worse, the public has been negatively conditioned toward &quot;industry&quot;, regardless of the industry.  Since the man-made global warming fraud affects everyone, I think it&#039;s much better to cheer any news regarding debunking of the fraud, or decreased support of the fraud by government, by noting the fraud is/will harm everyone (and that lack of propping up of the fraud will help everyone, not just &quot;industry&quot;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Supreme Court to Hear Global Warming Nuisance Case: Will the Court &#8230; &#124; Climate Change History Explore and Learn</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/12/08/supreme-court-to-hear-global-warming-nuisance-case-will-the-court-empower-trial-lawyers-to-enact-climate-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-48843</link> <dc:creator>Supreme Court to Hear Global Warming Nuisance Case: Will the Court &#8230; &#124; Climate Change History Explore and Learn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:21:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=6585#comment-48843</guid> <description>[...] post: Supreme Court to Hear Global Warming Nuisance Case: Will the Court &#8230;   This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged climate-change, court, district-court, [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post: Supreme Court to Hear Global Warming Nuisance Case: Will the Court &#8230;   This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged climate-change, court, district-court, [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Klaus</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/12/08/supreme-court-to-hear-global-warming-nuisance-case-will-the-court-empower-trial-lawyers-to-enact-climate-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-48807</link> <dc:creator>Klaus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:58:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=6585#comment-48807</guid> <description>This is very scary. We all know how the trial lawyers have been a major contributer to high medical costs, due to both insane lawsuits, and the secondary effect of possible litigation that causes un-necessary tests, etc. Now this will pale in comparison to what can happen to many industries if lawyers are allowed to press litigation for carbon emissions. This will accomplish what the left has so far not been able to do, bring down the United States of America. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very scary. We all know how the trial lawyers have been a major contributer to high medical costs, due to both insane lawsuits, and the secondary effect of possible litigation that causes un-necessary tests, etc. Now this will pale in comparison to what can happen to many industries if lawyers are allowed to press litigation for carbon emissions. This will accomplish what the left has so far not been able to do, bring down the United States of America.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/9 queries in 0.020 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 256/260 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-13 17:54:14 --