<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enviros&#8217; Bunk Crusade Against Bunker Fuel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/05/20/enviros-bunk-crusade-against-bunker-fuel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/05/20/enviros-bunk-crusade-against-bunker-fuel/</link>
	<description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 07:59:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunker Fuel Bans and Anti-Trade Collusion: Enviros, the World Bank, and the United Nations</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/05/20/enviros-bunk-crusade-against-bunker-fuel/comment-page-1/#comment-60385</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunker Fuel Bans and Anti-Trade Collusion: Enviros, the World Bank, and the United Nations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=8593#comment-60385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] few weeks ago, I wrote about the pending ban on ships carrying or using bunker fuel in the antarctic (set to go into effect in July) and radical environmentalists&#8217; attempts to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few weeks ago, I wrote about the pending ban on ships carrying or using bunker fuel in the antarctic (set to go into effect in July) and radical environmentalists&#8217; attempts to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NY AG Launches Spitzerian Suit over Fracking &#124; Women&#039;s Team CO2 Footprint Project</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/05/20/enviros-bunk-crusade-against-bunker-fuel/comment-page-1/#comment-60206</link>
		<dc:creator>NY AG Launches Spitzerian Suit over Fracking &#124; Women&#039;s Team CO2 Footprint Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 21:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=8593#comment-60206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] fact, these allegations are bunk. Just ask the British Parliament, which recently concluded that fracking is safe for water [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fact, these allegations are bunk. Just ask the British Parliament, which recently concluded that fracking is safe for water [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NY AG Launches Spitzerian Suit over Fracking</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/05/20/enviros-bunk-crusade-against-bunker-fuel/comment-page-1/#comment-60199</link>
		<dc:creator>NY AG Launches Spitzerian Suit over Fracking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 18:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=8593#comment-60199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] fact, these allegations are bunk. Just ask the British Parliament, which recently concluded that fracking is safe for water [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fact, these allegations are bunk. Just ask the British Parliament, which recently concluded that fracking is safe for water [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unintended consequences of green bunk &#171; The Daily Bayonet</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/05/20/enviros-bunk-crusade-against-bunker-fuel/comment-page-1/#comment-60098</link>
		<dc:creator>Unintended consequences of green bunk &#171; The Daily Bayonet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 14:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=8593#comment-60098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] week hippies complained that ships using bunker fuel should switch to more refined blends of fuel to reduce their impact on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week hippies complained that ships using bunker fuel should switch to more refined blends of fuel to reduce their impact on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/14 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 275/293 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-05-15 10:37:38 by W3 Total Cache --