<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: LaRouchies on Climate Change: My Guiltiest Pleasure</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/05/25/larouchies-on-climate-change-my-guiltiest-pleasure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/05/25/larouchies-on-climate-change-my-guiltiest-pleasure/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Skull / Bones &#187; Blog Archive &#187; got myself a cult following</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/05/25/larouchies-on-climate-change-my-guiltiest-pleasure/comment-page-1/#comment-60190</link> <dc:creator>Skull / Bones &#187; Blog Archive &#187; got myself a cult following</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 03:14:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=8773#comment-60190</guid> <description>[...] I know that this is his policy.  My point is that LaRouche’s own actions in the 1980′s and 1990′s have destroyed any credibility he may have had. As long as his name is still attached to this movement it will lack credibility as well. Ir he really believes in this cause, then he will remove his name from it for its own good.  Like it or not, public opinion does matter. Although I think Lyndon LaRouche is a certifiable nutcase, this video is spot on.  This is one of the few groups which actually grasp the physics of the problem of supplying energy to power an industrial society. If only they would break off from LaRouche and form their own group, they might be taken more seriously by the general public. If only.  And then there&#8217;s this:  While I could never support or respect a group whose ideological leader is an anti-Semite, and they ... [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I know that this is his policy.  My point is that LaRouche’s own actions in the 1980′s and 1990′s have destroyed any credibility he may have had. As long as his name is still attached to this movement it will lack credibility as well. Ir he really believes in this cause, then he will remove his name from it for its own good.  Like it or not, public opinion does matter. Although I think Lyndon LaRouche is a certifiable nutcase, this video is spot on.  This is one of the few groups which actually grasp the physics of the problem of supplying energy to power an industrial society. If only they would break off from LaRouche and form their own group, they might be taken more seriously by the general public. If only.  And then there&#8217;s this:  While I could never support or respect a group whose ideological leader is an anti-Semite, and they &#8230; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/7 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 222/226 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-13 12:15:59 --