<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Shale Oil, Not Science Fiction</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/02/shale-oil-not-science-fiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/02/shale-oil-not-science-fiction/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Richard J. Schneider</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/02/shale-oil-not-science-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-60391</link> <dc:creator>Richard J. Schneider</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:55:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=9045#comment-60391</guid> <description>&quot;In a hastily written post, I erroneously conflated the difference between ‘oil shale’ and ‘shale oil’ and incorrectly thought that the report mentioned below was referring to ‘shale oil.’ &quot;Bull. do your homework or get out of the internet tubes!--Richard J. Schneider/Denver..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In a hastily written post, I erroneously conflated the difference between ‘oil shale’ and ‘shale oil’ and incorrectly thought that the report mentioned below was referring to ‘shale oil.’ &#8221;</p><p>Bull. do your homework or get out of the internet tubes!</p><p>&#8211;Richard J. Schneider/Denver..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matthew Garrington</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/02/shale-oil-not-science-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-60277</link> <dc:creator>Matthew Garrington</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:10:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=9045#comment-60277</guid> <description>Hi Brian,We appreciate the feedback and critique. Your response, however, makes a rather common error. You are conflating &quot;oil shale&quot; which has never been commercially produced in the U.S. with the highly profitable &quot;shale oil&quot; plays. These are very, very different resources.There is an Investing Daily article that does a great job explaining the differences between these very different resources: http://www.investingdaily.com/tes/16405/oil-shale-versus-shale-oil.htmlAlso, we believe oil shale is science fiction because we are no more closer today to a financially viable model for producing oil shale that we were when we discovered the resource. But don&#039;t take my word for it. Companies such as Shell are still trying to pull the sword from the oil shale stone saying we have another decade of research before we&#039;ll even know how to extract oil shale.Tracy Boyd, Shell Corporation: &quot;In fact, it could take up to 10 to 12 years of additional research, environmental analysis and permitting before a company could develop a federal oil shale lease.&quot; - Glenwood Springs Post Independent, Oil shale decisions could affect Garfield County, Nov. 11, 2008And who knows if that prediction is any closer to what was written in a 1917 Christian Science Monitor article: &quot;Thousands of acres of land in the rich oil shale area in western Colorado, productive of unlimited combustible and munitions material, have been filed on recently by Colorado and eastern syndicates, says the Times, and preparations are underway for the development of the fields this spring.&quot;Let&#039;s have an honest conversation about oil shale and stop touting it as a resource to save us from high gas prices when we don&#039;t yet know how to develop it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian,</p><p>We appreciate the feedback and critique. Your response, however, makes a rather common error. You are conflating &#8220;oil shale&#8221; which has never been commercially produced in the U.S. with the highly profitable &#8220;shale oil&#8221; plays. These are very, very different resources.</p><p>There is an Investing Daily article that does a great job explaining the differences between these very different resources: <a href="http://www.investingdaily.com/tes/16405/oil-shale-versus-shale-oil.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.investingdaily.com/tes/16405/oil-shale-versus-shale-oil.html</a></p><p>Also, we believe oil shale is science fiction because we are no more closer today to a financially viable model for producing oil shale that we were when we discovered the resource. But don&#8217;t take my word for it. Companies such as Shell are still trying to pull the sword from the oil shale stone saying we have another decade of research before we&#8217;ll even know how to extract oil shale.</p><p>Tracy Boyd, Shell Corporation: &#8220;In fact, it could take up to 10 to 12 years of additional research, environmental analysis and permitting before a company could develop a federal oil shale lease.&#8221; &#8211; Glenwood Springs Post Independent, Oil shale decisions could affect Garfield County, Nov. 11, 2008</p><p>And who knows if that prediction is any closer to what was written in a 1917 Christian Science Monitor article: &#8220;Thousands of acres of land in the rich oil shale area in western Colorado, productive of unlimited combustible and munitions material, have been filed on recently by Colorado and eastern syndicates, says the Times, and preparations are underway for the development of the fields this spring.&#8221;</p><p>Let&#8217;s have an honest conversation about oil shale and stop touting it as a resource to save us from high gas prices when we don&#8217;t yet know how to develop it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/8 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 239/243 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-02-12 21:47:28 --