<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Air Board Boasts Its GHG Standards Save More Fuel than DOT&#8217;s Fuel Economy Standards &#8212; But Denies GHG Standards Are Fuel Economy Standards. Huh?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/14/california-air-board-boasts-its-ghg-standards-save-more-fuel-than-dots-fuel-economy-standards-but-denies-ghg-standards-are-fuel-economy-standards-huh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/14/california-air-board-boasts-its-ghg-standards-save-more-fuel-than-dots-fuel-economy-standards-but-denies-ghg-standards-are-fuel-economy-standards-huh/</link>
	<description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: House Committee Opens New Front in Fuel Economy Battle &#124; California News</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/14/california-air-board-boasts-its-ghg-standards-save-more-fuel-than-dots-fuel-economy-standards-but-denies-ghg-standards-are-fuel-economy-standards-huh/comment-page-1/#comment-61211</link>
		<dc:creator>House Committee Opens New Front in Fuel Economy Battle &#124; California News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=9368#comment-61211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] explained here, here, and here, motor vehicle GHG standards are almost 95% fuel economy regulation (because 94-95% of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] explained here, here, and here, motor vehicle GHG standards are almost 95% fuel economy regulation (because 94-95% of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: House Committee Opens New Front in Fuel Economy Battle &#124; Women&#039;s Team CO2 Footprint Project</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/14/california-air-board-boasts-its-ghg-standards-save-more-fuel-than-dots-fuel-economy-standards-but-denies-ghg-standards-are-fuel-economy-standards-huh/comment-page-1/#comment-61210</link>
		<dc:creator>House Committee Opens New Front in Fuel Economy Battle &#124; Women&#039;s Team CO2 Footprint Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 22:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=9368#comment-61210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] explained here, here, and here, motor vehicle GHG standards are almost 95% fuel economy regulation (because 94-95% of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] explained here, here, and here, motor vehicle GHG standards are almost 95% fuel economy regulation (because 94-95% of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EPA Greenhouse Gas/NHTSA Fuel Economy Standards: ‘Harmonized and Consistent’? &#124; Women&#039;s Team CO2 Footprint Project</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/14/california-air-board-boasts-its-ghg-standards-save-more-fuel-than-dots-fuel-economy-standards-but-denies-ghg-standards-are-fuel-economy-standards-huh/comment-page-1/#comment-60748</link>
		<dc:creator>EPA Greenhouse Gas/NHTSA Fuel Economy Standards: ‘Harmonized and Consistent’? &#124; Women&#039;s Team CO2 Footprint Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=9368#comment-60748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] post updates my June 14 post on the mantra intoned by EPA, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and the National Highway [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post updates my June 14 post on the mantra intoned by EPA, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and the National Highway [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EPA Greenhouse Gas/NHTSA Fuel Economy Standards: &#8216;Harmonized and Consistent&#8217;?</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/14/california-air-board-boasts-its-ghg-standards-save-more-fuel-than-dots-fuel-economy-standards-but-denies-ghg-standards-are-fuel-economy-standards-huh/comment-page-1/#comment-60745</link>
		<dc:creator>EPA Greenhouse Gas/NHTSA Fuel Economy Standards: &#8216;Harmonized and Consistent&#8217;?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=9368#comment-60745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] post updates my June 14 post on the mantra of the EPA, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and the National Highway [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post updates my June 14 post on the mantra of the EPA, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and the National Highway [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 12/22 queries in 0.024 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 279/308 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-05-15 14:02:01 by W3 Total Cache --