<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: California Air Board Boasts Its GHG Standards Save More Fuel than DOT&#8217;s Fuel Economy Standards &#8212; But Denies GHG Standards Are Fuel Economy Standards. Huh?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/14/california-air-board-boasts-its-ghg-standards-save-more-fuel-than-dots-fuel-economy-standards-but-denies-ghg-standards-are-fuel-economy-standards-huh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/14/california-air-board-boasts-its-ghg-standards-save-more-fuel-than-dots-fuel-economy-standards-but-denies-ghg-standards-are-fuel-economy-standards-huh/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: House Committee Opens New Front in Fuel Economy Battle &#124; California News</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/14/california-air-board-boasts-its-ghg-standards-save-more-fuel-than-dots-fuel-economy-standards-but-denies-ghg-standards-are-fuel-economy-standards-huh/comment-page-1/#comment-61211</link> <dc:creator>House Committee Opens New Front in Fuel Economy Battle &#124; California News</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:17:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=9368#comment-61211</guid> <description>[...] explained here, here, and here, motor vehicle GHG standards are almost 95% fuel economy regulation (because 94-95% of [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] explained here, here, and here, motor vehicle GHG standards are almost 95% fuel economy regulation (because 94-95% of [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: House Committee Opens New Front in Fuel Economy Battle &#124; Women&#039;s Team CO2 Footprint Project</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/14/california-air-board-boasts-its-ghg-standards-save-more-fuel-than-dots-fuel-economy-standards-but-denies-ghg-standards-are-fuel-economy-standards-huh/comment-page-1/#comment-61210</link> <dc:creator>House Committee Opens New Front in Fuel Economy Battle &#124; Women&#039;s Team CO2 Footprint Project</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 22:49:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=9368#comment-61210</guid> <description>[...] explained here, here, and here, motor vehicle GHG standards are almost 95% fuel economy regulation (because 94-95% of [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] explained here, here, and here, motor vehicle GHG standards are almost 95% fuel economy regulation (because 94-95% of [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EPA Greenhouse Gas/NHTSA Fuel Economy Standards: ‘Harmonized and Consistent’? &#124; Women&#039;s Team CO2 Footprint Project</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/14/california-air-board-boasts-its-ghg-standards-save-more-fuel-than-dots-fuel-economy-standards-but-denies-ghg-standards-are-fuel-economy-standards-huh/comment-page-1/#comment-60748</link> <dc:creator>EPA Greenhouse Gas/NHTSA Fuel Economy Standards: ‘Harmonized and Consistent’? &#124; Women&#039;s Team CO2 Footprint Project</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:53:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=9368#comment-60748</guid> <description>[...] post updates my June 14 post on the mantra intoned by EPA, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and the National Highway [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post updates my June 14 post on the mantra intoned by EPA, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and the National Highway [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EPA Greenhouse Gas/NHTSA Fuel Economy Standards: &#8216;Harmonized and Consistent&#8217;?</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/14/california-air-board-boasts-its-ghg-standards-save-more-fuel-than-dots-fuel-economy-standards-but-denies-ghg-standards-are-fuel-economy-standards-huh/comment-page-1/#comment-60745</link> <dc:creator>EPA Greenhouse Gas/NHTSA Fuel Economy Standards: &#8216;Harmonized and Consistent&#8217;?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:27:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=9368#comment-60745</guid> <description>[...] post updates my June 14 post on the mantra of the EPA, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and the National Highway [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post updates my June 14 post on the mantra of the EPA, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and the National Highway [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 273/277 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-13 12:36:30 --