Comments on: Repairing the IPCC’s Image

By: Russell C

Russell C — Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:06:30 +0000

My special research (see http://www.globalwarming.org/author/russell-cook/ ) has concerned the media smear of skeptic scientists – when Donna LaFramboise at nofrakkingconsensus.com said Greenpeace people were found in the IPCC’s “Annex IV Reviewers of the IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report”, I looked to see if I could recognize any names in the United States section who relate to the smear. I found three, explanations about two of them are too long to detail, but this simple one is as direct as it comes to the enviro-advocacy group Ozone Action, which was merged into Greenpeace USA in 2000.

* Gallagher, Kelly Sims, Harvard University – formerly just Kelly Sims, Science Policy Director/International Policy Specialist at Ozone Action, a speaker on behalf of that group at the UNFCCC (Bonn) in August ’97, later described at a nautilus.org bio as participating “in more than a dozen rounds of international negotiations on global climate change and was an advisor to CNN in Kyoto and Buenos Aires. She was previously a Truman Scholar in the office of Vice President Gore…”

Paraphrasing from the old Nixon problem, ‘there is a cancer on the IPCC and AGW’.

By: mememine69

mememine69 — Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:08:42 +0000

I’m not the only one contacting authorities and law makers and the justice departments to have the leading scientists and NEWS EDITORS charged for this needless panic of a false war called Climate Change. We missed getting Bush………….
Catastrophic climate change was virtually a comet hit of an emergency yet Obama didn’t even mention the crisis in his state of the union address and was silent along with the scientists when American IPCC/UN climate research grants were all pulled. It’s clear to this former believer that the science was exaggerated, exploited and as we can see now, unsustainable in voter support. The new denier is anyone who still thinks most people are still supporters and believers and willing to sacrifice climate mitigation actions.

By: Climate change panel in hot water again over ‘biased’ energy report – The Independent

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 05:02:09 +0000

[...] has learnt. …A Deeper Look at an Energy Analysis Raises Big QuestionsNew York Times (blog)Repairing the IPCC's ImageGlobal Warming (blog)Don't Sacrifice the Planet's Arteries to Save Her LungsInternational [...]

By: Climate change panel in hot water again over ‘biased’ energy report – The Independent

Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:19:34 +0000

[...] ChangeBig Think (blog)Reducing climate change is good for your healthPharmaceutical ProcessingGlobal Warming (blog) -Men’s News Daily -International Rivers (blog)all 12 news [...]

By: Mark Lynas

Mark Lynas — Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:46:41 +0000

Since the extract above comes from my blog post on the issue, I should clarify that Teske is *a* lead author, not *the* lead author of the IPCC report. That of course is quite bad enough…