<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Solar Bubble’s Growth Only Worsens the Inevitable Burst</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/17/the-solar-bubble%e2%80%99s-growth-only-worsens-the-inevitable-burst/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/17/the-solar-bubble%e2%80%99s-growth-only-worsens-the-inevitable-burst/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Robert</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/17/the-solar-bubble%e2%80%99s-growth-only-worsens-the-inevitable-burst/comment-page-1/#comment-60719</link> <dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:40:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=9493#comment-60719</guid> <description>How can anyone be a friend of the old bulb? Have you never heard of LED&#039;s? It is in many situations a perfect substitute for the bulb. And the low-energy-bulb is not that bad either. So support the ban and reduce energy consumption.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can anyone be a friend of the old bulb? Have you never heard of LED&#8217;s? It is in many situations a perfect substitute for the bulb. And the low-energy-bulb is not that bad either. So support the ban and reduce energy consumption.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/17/the-solar-bubble%e2%80%99s-growth-only-worsens-the-inevitable-burst/comment-page-1/#comment-60718</link> <dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:35:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=9493#comment-60718</guid> <description>Of course all renewable energy sources should be subsidized, in favor of fossile, primitive technology. I would never put my trust in the market to solve the climate- and energy problems for current and future generations.  Slowly solar and wind power becomes competititive - what a relief, isn&#039;t it? It is time to reduce the impact of the big oil companies....concerns of future generations is of none importance to them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course all renewable energy sources should be subsidized, in favor of fossile, primitive technology. I would never put my trust in the market to solve the climate- and energy problems for current and future generations.  Slowly solar and wind power becomes competititive &#8211; what a relief, isn&#8217;t it? It is time to reduce the impact of the big oil companies&#8230;.concerns of future generations is of none importance to them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doug Hanes</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/17/the-solar-bubble%e2%80%99s-growth-only-worsens-the-inevitable-burst/comment-page-1/#comment-60679</link> <dc:creator>Doug Hanes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:01:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=9493#comment-60679</guid> <description>Solar should not be subsidized. The jobs are make up jobs. Rubber room jobs where people actually work but produce a greatly reduced value, ergo the subsidy. Meanwhile, in the real world Qing-Bin Lu has proven CFCs caused all the warming  and the world banned them in 1996 thus solving the warming problem. Global cooling began around 2002 spawning climategate. Lu&#039;s CFC explaination fits the data and CO2 does not. Check out Facebook page &quot;Free CO2...the CFCs did it!&quot; or just Google Lu. You&#039;ll be glad you did.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solar should not be subsidized. The jobs are make up jobs. Rubber room jobs where people actually work but produce a greatly reduced value, ergo the subsidy.<br /> Meanwhile, in the real world Qing-Bin Lu has proven CFCs caused all the warming  and the world banned them in 1996 thus solving the warming problem. Global cooling began around 2002 spawning climategate. Lu&#8217;s CFC explaination fits the data and CO2 does not. Check out Facebook page &#8220;Free CO2&#8230;the CFCs did it!&#8221; or just Google Lu. You&#8217;ll be glad you did.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Douglas Hvistendahl</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/17/the-solar-bubble%e2%80%99s-growth-only-worsens-the-inevitable-burst/comment-page-1/#comment-60641</link> <dc:creator>Douglas Hvistendahl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:46:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=9493#comment-60641</guid> <description>Many think all solar is the same. Solar thermal pre-heat will pay now in cold climates without subsidies.But if you want real cost-effectiveness, either put in a backyard garden, or else arrange some fans to blow summer air up into the house for cheap cooling. If you do the latter, be sure to use a dehumidifier. The ROI for these two is larger than any other investment we&#039;ve made yet.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many think all solar is the same. Solar thermal pre-heat will pay now in cold climates without subsidies.</p><p>But if you want real cost-effectiveness, either put in a backyard garden, or else arrange some fans to blow summer air up into the house for cheap cooling. If you do the latter, be sure to use a dehumidifier. The ROI for these two is larger than any other investment we&#8217;ve made yet.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tom</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/06/17/the-solar-bubble%e2%80%99s-growth-only-worsens-the-inevitable-burst/comment-page-1/#comment-60628</link> <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:36:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=9493#comment-60628</guid> <description>You say this without noting the continuous double-digit percentage cost reductions in solar that should eventually make the industry self-sustaining.  Are you seriously implying that utilities are market-based?  In many states, they are  highly regulated government-backed companies, sometimes having guaranteed returns by the state.  Some policies are better than others, but acting like we should just strip away solar policies altogether is irresponsible.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say this without noting the continuous double-digit percentage cost reductions in solar that should eventually make the industry self-sustaining.  Are you seriously implying that utilities are market-based?  In many states, they are  highly regulated government-backed companies, sometimes having guaranteed returns by the state.  Some policies are better than others, but acting like we should just strip away solar policies altogether is irresponsible.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/11 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 290/294 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-13 23:10:39 --