<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Issa: 54.5 MPG Fuel Economy Standard Negotiated Outside Scope of Law</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/08/15/issa-54-5-mpg-fuel-economy-standard-negotiated-outside-scope-of-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/08/15/issa-54-5-mpg-fuel-economy-standard-negotiated-outside-scope-of-law/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: 2012 Dodge Charger, Chrysler 300 Are » &#124; Economy 2011</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/08/15/issa-54-5-mpg-fuel-economy-standard-negotiated-outside-scope-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-62007</link> <dc:creator>2012 Dodge Charger, Chrysler 300 Are » &#124; Economy 2011</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:00:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10388#comment-62007</guid> <description>[...] on July 29, 2011, were negotiated in secret, outside the scope of law, &#8230; Read more on Global Warming (blog)  Tags: 2012, Charger, Chrysler, [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on July 29, 2011, were negotiated in secret, outside the scope of law, &#8230; Read more on Global Warming (blog)  Tags: 2012, Charger, Chrysler, [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Update on Legality of Obama’s 54.5 MPG Standard &#124; Women&#039;s Team CO2 Footprint Project</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/08/15/issa-54-5-mpg-fuel-economy-standard-negotiated-outside-scope-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-61652</link> <dc:creator>Update on Legality of Obama’s 54.5 MPG Standard &#124; Women&#039;s Team CO2 Footprint Project</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:10:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10388#comment-61652</guid> <description>[...] Monday, I noted that Team Obama plans to set new-car fuel-economy standards for model years (MYs) 2017-2025, a [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Monday, I noted that Team Obama plans to set new-car fuel-economy standards for model years (MYs) 2017-2025, a [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Update on the Legality of Obama’s 54.5 MPG Standard &#124; Women&#039;s Team CO2 Footprint Project</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/08/15/issa-54-5-mpg-fuel-economy-standard-negotiated-outside-scope-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-61636</link> <dc:creator>Update on the Legality of Obama’s 54.5 MPG Standard &#124; Women&#039;s Team CO2 Footprint Project</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10388#comment-61636</guid> <description>[...] Monday, I noted that Team Obama plans to set new-car fuel-economy standards for model years (MYs) 2017-2025, a [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Monday, I noted that Team Obama plans to set new-car fuel-economy standards for model years (MYs) 2017-2025, a [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Update on the Legality of Obama&#8217;s 54.5 MPG Standard</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/08/15/issa-54-5-mpg-fuel-economy-standard-negotiated-outside-scope-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-61634</link> <dc:creator>Update on the Legality of Obama&#8217;s 54.5 MPG Standard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:29:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10388#comment-61634</guid> <description>[...] Today?Latest Evidence of Runaway Regulatory Chain Reaction: Greens Sacrifice Biomass to Get at CoalIssa: 54.5 MPG Fuel Economy Standard Negotiated Outside Scope of LawIs BOEMRE Harrassing Polar Bear Biologist Charles Monnett?GlobalWarming.orgBlogFeaturesKyoto [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today?Latest Evidence of Runaway Regulatory Chain Reaction: Greens Sacrifice Biomass to Get at CoalIssa: 54.5 MPG Fuel Economy Standard Negotiated Outside Scope of LawIs BOEMRE Harrassing Polar Bear Biologist Charles Monnett?GlobalWarming.orgBlogFeaturesKyoto [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Issa: 54.5 MPG Fuel Economy Standard Negotiated Outside Scope of Law &#8211; Global Warming (blog) &#124; Efficiency</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/08/15/issa-54-5-mpg-fuel-economy-standard-negotiated-outside-scope-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-61633</link> <dc:creator>Issa: 54.5 MPG Fuel Economy Standard Negotiated Outside Scope of Law &#8211; Global Warming (blog) &#124; Efficiency</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:34:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10388#comment-61633</guid> <description>[...] Global Warming (blog) [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Global Warming (blog) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rajiv</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/08/15/issa-54-5-mpg-fuel-economy-standard-negotiated-outside-scope-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-61632</link> <dc:creator>Rajiv</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:17:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10388#comment-61632</guid> <description>It&#039;s really interesting to hear Issa complain about conflicts of interests when he uses earmarks to improve infrastructure where he has real estate holdings.  This is the same person who still actively manages his companies and investments and then legislates accordingly.If automakers and the Obama administration have already agreed to specific emissions standards, why does Issa need to attack it?  Doesn&#039;t he have something else to do but get in the way of the US becoming less dependent on foreign oil?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really interesting to hear Issa complain about conflicts of interests when he uses earmarks to improve infrastructure where he has real estate holdings.  This is the same person who still actively manages his companies and investments and then legislates accordingly.</p><p>If automakers and the Obama administration have already agreed to specific emissions standards, why does Issa need to attack it?  Doesn&#8217;t he have something else to do but get in the way of the US becoming less dependent on foreign oil?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cleanwater</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/08/15/issa-54-5-mpg-fuel-economy-standard-negotiated-outside-scope-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-61627</link> <dc:creator>cleanwater</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:03:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10388#comment-61627</guid> <description>AS the &quot;greenhouse gas effect &quot;has been proven to not exist by creditable experimental science, everthing the EPA is doing to limit CO2 is a crime. Lisa Jackson and other EPA administrators and their boss Obama should be charged with crimes agains Humanity. When major university physics departments are afraid to tell the truth that the &quot;greenhouse gas effect&quot; has never been proven with experimental data We are in trouble. List of references: The paper &quot;Falsification of the Atmospheric CO2 greenhouse effect within the frame of physics&quot; by Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner is an in-depth examination of the subject. Version 4 2009 Electronic version of an article published as International Journal of Modern Physics B, Vol. 23, No. 3 (2009) 275{364 , DOI No: 10.1142/S021797920904984X, c World Scientific Publishing Company, www.worldscinet.com/ijmpb. Report of Alan Carlin of US-EPA March, 2009 that shows that CO2 does not cause global warming.Greenhouse Gas Hypothesis Violates Fundamentals of Physics” by Dipl-Ing Heinz Thieme . R.W.Wood from the London, Edinborough and Dublin Philosophical Magazine , 1909, vol 17, p319-320. Cambridge p340.1.c.95, i The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory By Alan Siddons from:http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/the_hidden_flaw_in_greenhouse.html at March 01, 2010 - 09:10:34 AM CSTAfter 1909 when R.W.Wood proved that the understanding of the greenhouse effect was in error and the ghg effect does not exist. After Niels Bohr published his work and receive a Nobel Prize in Physics in 1922. The fantasy of the greenhouse gas effect should have died in 1909 and 1922. Since then it has been shown by several physicists that the concept is a Violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics.University of Pennsylvania Law School ILE INSTITUTE FOR LAW AND ECONOMICS A Joint Research Center of the Law School, the Wharton School, and the Department of Economics in the School of Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania RESEARCH PAPER NO. 10-08 Global Warming Advocacy Science: a Cross Examination Jason Scott Johnston UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA May 2010 This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: ssrn. Israeli Astrophysicist Nir Shaviv: &#039;There is no direct evidence showing that CO2 caused 20th century warming, or as a matter of fact, any warming&#039; link to this paper on climate depot. Web- site references: Slaying the Sky Dragon - Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory [Kindle Edition] Tim Ball (Author), Claes Johnson (Author), Martin Hertzberg (Author), Joseph A. Olson (Author), Alan Siddons (Author), Charles Anderson (Author), Hans Schreuder (Author), John O&#039;Sullivan (Author) Wood is correct: There is no Greenhouse Effect Posted on July 19, 2011 by Dr. Ed Repeatability of Professor Robert W. Wood’s 1909 experiment on the Theory of the Greenhouse (Summary by Ed Berry. Full report here or here. &amp; PolyMontana.) by Nasif S. Nahle, June 12, 2011 University Professor, Scientific Research Director at Biology Cabinet® San Nicolas de los Garza, N. L., Mexico.www.americanthinker.com 			Ponder the Maunder .. The only thing more dangerous than ignorance is arrogance.&quot; —Albert Einstein</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AS the &#8220;greenhouse gas effect &#8220;has been proven to not exist by creditable experimental science, everthing the EPA is doing to limit CO2 is a crime. Lisa Jackson and other EPA administrators and their boss Obama should be charged with crimes agains Humanity.<br /> When major university physics departments are afraid to tell the truth that the &#8220;greenhouse gas effect&#8221; has never been proven with experimental data We are in trouble.<br /> List of references:<br /> The paper &#8220;Falsification of the Atmospheric CO2 greenhouse effect within the frame of physics&#8221; by Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner is an in-depth examination of the subject. Version 4 2009<br /> Electronic version of an article published as International Journal of Modern Physics<br /> B, Vol. 23, No. 3 (2009) 275{364 , DOI No: 10.1142/S021797920904984X, c World<br /> Scientific Publishing Company, <a href="http://www.worldscinet.com/ijmpb" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldscinet.com/ijmpb</a>.<br /> Report of Alan Carlin of US-EPA March, 2009 that shows that CO2 does not cause global warming.</p><p>Greenhouse Gas Hypothesis Violates Fundamentals of Physics” by Dipl-Ing Heinz Thieme .<br /> R.W.Wood<br /> from the London, Edinborough and Dublin Philosophical Magazine , 1909, vol 17, p319-320. Cambridge p340.1.c.95, i<br /> The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory<br /> By Alan Siddons<br /> from:<a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/the_hidden_flaw_in_greenhouse.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/the_hidden_flaw_in_greenhouse.html</a> at March 01, 2010 &#8211; 09:10:34 AM CST</p><p>After 1909 when R.W.Wood proved that the understanding of the greenhouse effect was in error and the ghg effect does not exist. After Niels Bohr published his work and receive a Nobel Prize in Physics in 1922. The fantasy of the greenhouse gas effect should have died in 1909 and 1922. Since then it has been shown by several physicists that the concept is a Violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics.</p><p>University of Pennsylvania Law School<br /> ILE<br /> INSTITUTE FOR LAW AND ECONOMICS<br /> A Joint Research Center of the Law School, the Wharton School,<br /> and the Department of Economics in the School of Arts and Sciences<br /> at the University of Pennsylvania<br /> RESEARCH PAPER NO. 10-08<br /> Global Warming Advocacy Science: a Cross Examination<br /> Jason Scott Johnston<br /> UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA<br /> May 2010<br /> This paper can be downloaded without charge from the<br /> Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection:<br /> ssrn.<br /> Israeli Astrophysicist Nir Shaviv: &#8216;There is no direct evidence showing that CO2 caused 20th century warming, or as a matter of fact, any warming&#8217; link to this paper on climate depot.<br /> Web- site references:<br /> Slaying the Sky Dragon &#8211; Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory [Kindle Edition]<br /> Tim Ball (Author), Claes Johnson (Author), Martin Hertzberg (Author), Joseph A. Olson (Author), Alan Siddons (Author), Charles Anderson (Author), Hans Schreuder (Author), John O&#8217;Sullivan (Author)<br /> Wood is correct: There is no Greenhouse Effect<br /> Posted on July 19, 2011 by Dr. Ed<br /> Repeatability of Professor Robert W. Wood’s 1909 experiment on the Theory of the Greenhouse (Summary by Ed Berry. Full report here or here. &amp; PolyMontana.)<br /> by Nasif S. Nahle, June 12, 2011<br /> University Professor, Scientific Research Director at Biology Cabinet® San Nicolas de los Garza, N. L., Mexico.</p><p><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com</a> Ponder the Maunder<br /> ..<br /> The only thing more dangerous than ignorance is arrogance.&#8221;<br /> —Albert Einstein</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Klaus</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/08/15/issa-54-5-mpg-fuel-economy-standard-negotiated-outside-scope-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-61622</link> <dc:creator>Klaus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:29:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10388#comment-61622</guid> <description>Good article, as usual. The best thing congress could do is to deny funds to EPA. That would do more to get us out of the financial mess we are in than anything else I can think of, except getting rid of the present administration.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article, as usual. The best thing congress could do is to deny funds to EPA. That would do more to get us out of the financial mess we are in than anything else I can think of, except getting rid of the present administration.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Issa to the rescue over CAFE? &#124; JunkScience Sidebar</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/08/15/issa-54-5-mpg-fuel-economy-standard-negotiated-outside-scope-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-61621</link> <dc:creator>Issa to the rescue over CAFE? &#124; JunkScience Sidebar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 05:10:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10388#comment-61621</guid> <description>[...] Issa: 54.5 MPG Fuel Economy Standard Negotiated Outside Scope of Law by MARLO LEWIS on AUGUST 15, 2011 [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Issa: 54.5 MPG Fuel Economy Standard Negotiated Outside Scope of Law by MARLO LEWIS on AUGUST 15, 2011 [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/15 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 358/362 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-02-12 14:26:27 --