Comments on: Is Gov. Perry ‘Anti-Science’? (Updated, Sep. 14, 2011) http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/09/09/is-gov-perry-anti-science/ Climate Change News & Analysis Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:44:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: shafiwhifgowhttp://www.globalwarming.org/2011/09/09/is-gov-perry-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-62361 shafiwhifgow Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:42:35 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10672#comment-62361 hi hi

]]> By: Rick Perry and Galileo: The religious beliefs behind global warming skepticism – Houston Chronicle (blog) « My Bloghttp://www.globalwarming.org/2011/09/09/is-gov-perry-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-62256 Rick Perry and Galileo: The religious beliefs behind global warming skepticism – Houston Chronicle (blog) « My Blog Sat, 17 Sep 2011 00:06:20 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10672#comment-62256 [...] Climate-Change Deniers Are the Vatican, Not the Persecuted …International Business TimesIs Gov. Perry 'Anti-Science'?Global Warming (blog)Reviewing the GOP debateBoston GlobeNPR (blog) -ABC News [...] [...] Climate-Change Deniers Are the Vatican, Not the Persecuted …International Business TimesIs Gov. Perry 'Anti-Science'?Global Warming (blog)Reviewing the GOP debateBoston GlobeNPR (blog) -ABC News [...]

]]> By: TREVOR MERCHANThttp://www.globalwarming.org/2011/09/09/is-gov-perry-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-62198 TREVOR MERCHANT Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:09:04 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10672#comment-62198 I READ THE PRINT HARD COPY OF PAUL GRUGMAN.S ARTICLE IN THE NEW YORK TIMES THE ENTIRE ARTICLE . THEN I MADE THE ATTEMPT TO RESPOND TO HIS ARTICLE WITH MY COMMENTS AND OR VIEWS ONLINE THE NEW YORK TIMES AS I AM SUBSCRIBER WTTH THE NEW YORK TIMES ONLINE AS I ENDEAVOUR TO ENSURE THAT I AM PRIVY TO THE NEW YORK TIMES WITH TWO ALTERNATIVES SO THAT I WILL BE ABLE TO READ WHAT EVER IS PIBLISHED FIRST HANDEDLY SO AS TO NOT ATTAIN SECOND HAND INFORMATION AS THE NEW YORK TIMES IS THE PRIMARY AGENT FOR THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA OF THE FOURTH ESTATE AND THE MEDIA AGENT FOR THE PRESIDENT .THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE ENTITIES OF THE UNHOLY ALLIANCES OF THE LIE-BERALS RADICALS . THE NY TIMES ENDORSES ANTHONY WEINER FOR CONGRESS , NOT SURPRISING TO ME AT ALL .ANTHONY WEINER DO NOT KNOW THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THIS NATION OWES WHICH IS FOURTEEN TRILLION DOLLARS . HE SAYS IT IS FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS . EVEN THE NY DAILY NEWS COULD NOT ENDORSES THIS RADICAL . I WERE DENIED THE OPPURTUNITY TO MAKE THE COMMENT ON PAUL GRUGMAN,S ARTICLE AS IT WAS STATED THAT COMMENTS WERE NO LONGER BEING ACCEPTED PAUL GRUGMAN AS IT IS THE USUAL CASE CONFIRMS THE LIE-BERALS RADICALS ELITEISMS AND BRAGGADOCIAS THAT THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES WHOM ARE PERFECT .BRILLIANT . KNOWLEDGEABLE FORESIGHTED AND OF THE HIGHEST ORDER . HE IS SO ARROGANT AS PER USUAL HIS LUNACY SPEAKS HIGH HEAVENS ,INFUTURE DRAFTS I WILL BROADEN AND EXPAND ON HIS DIATRIBES .I THANK YOU TREVOR MERCHANT BRONX NEW YORK CITY SATURDAY .AGUGUST 10. 2011 I READ THE PRINT HARD COPY OF PAUL GRUGMAN.S ARTICLE IN THE NEW YORK TIMES THE ENTIRE ARTICLE . THEN I MADE THE ATTEMPT TO RESPOND TO HIS ARTICLE WITH MY COMMENTS AND OR VIEWS ONLINE THE NEW YORK TIMES AS I AM SUBSCRIBER WTTH THE NEW YORK TIMES ONLINE AS I ENDEAVOUR TO ENSURE THAT I AM PRIVY TO THE NEW YORK TIMES WITH TWO ALTERNATIVES SO THAT I WILL BE ABLE TO READ WHAT EVER IS PIBLISHED FIRST HANDEDLY SO AS TO NOT ATTAIN SECOND HAND INFORMATION AS THE NEW YORK TIMES IS THE PRIMARY AGENT FOR THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA OF THE FOURTH ESTATE AND THE MEDIA AGENT FOR THE PRESIDENT .THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE ENTITIES OF THE UNHOLY ALLIANCES OF THE LIE-BERALS RADICALS . THE NY TIMES ENDORSES ANTHONY WEINER FOR CONGRESS , NOT SURPRISING TO ME AT ALL .ANTHONY WEINER DO NOT KNOW THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THIS NATION OWES WHICH IS FOURTEEN TRILLION DOLLARS . HE SAYS IT IS FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS . EVEN THE NY DAILY NEWS COULD NOT ENDORSES THIS RADICAL . I WERE DENIED THE OPPURTUNITY TO MAKE THE COMMENT ON PAUL GRUGMAN,S ARTICLE AS IT WAS STATED THAT COMMENTS WERE NO LONGER BEING ACCEPTED PAUL GRUGMAN AS IT IS THE USUAL CASE CONFIRMS THE LIE-BERALS RADICALS ELITEISMS AND BRAGGADOCIAS THAT THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES WHOM ARE PERFECT .BRILLIANT . KNOWLEDGEABLE FORESIGHTED AND OF THE HIGHEST ORDER . HE IS SO ARROGANT AS PER USUAL HIS LUNACY SPEAKS HIGH HEAVENS ,INFUTURE DRAFTS I WILL BROADEN AND EXPAND ON HIS DIATRIBES .I THANK YOU TREVOR MERCHANT BRONX NEW YORK CITY SATURDAY .AGUGUST 10. 2011

]]> By: Daniel Kirk-Davidoffhttp://www.globalwarming.org/2011/09/09/is-gov-perry-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-62195 Daniel Kirk-Davidoff Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:50:26 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10672#comment-62195 You are, of course, relying on alarmist economists as the basis for a claim that a cap-and-trade system on carbon with rather modest goals would have *any* negative effect on the economy. The economic models upon which such scaremongering are based have a much poorer track record for meaningful predictive power than climate models, and even if anyone believed them, they suggest, at worst, fractional reductions in the rate of economic growth going forward. No one is suggesting that we can ditch oil, coal and natural gas *today*, but it's not at all unreasonable to suppose that 50 years from now we could have a substantial shift towards electrification of our economy, with that electricity generated by a combination of nuclear, solar, wind, geothermal, and carbon-sequestering natural gas. Mr. Thomas, you're a smart guy, but you are spending your career trying to stop the world from embarking on policies that have at worst minor costs, and which if implemented, would encourage a shift away from fossil fuels and towards lower-carbon energy sources that might conceivably turn out to have been unnecessary or ineffective from a climate point of view, but which would have many other environmental benefits (smog reduction, sustainability, etc.). Please choose a better line of work! You are, of course, relying on alarmist economists as the basis for a claim that a cap-and-trade system on carbon with rather modest goals would have *any* negative effect on the economy. The economic models upon which such scaremongering are based have a much poorer track record for meaningful predictive power than climate models, and even if anyone believed them, they suggest, at worst, fractional reductions in the rate of economic growth going forward. No one is suggesting that we can ditch oil, coal and natural gas *today*, but it’s not at all unreasonable to suppose that 50 years from now we could have a substantial shift towards electrification of our economy, with that electricity generated by a combination of nuclear, solar, wind, geothermal, and carbon-sequestering natural gas. Mr. Thomas, you’re a smart guy, but you are spending your career trying to stop the world from embarking on policies that have at worst minor costs, and which if implemented, would encourage a shift away from fossil fuels and towards lower-carbon energy sources that might conceivably turn out to have been unnecessary or ineffective from a climate point of view, but which would have many other environmental benefits (smog reduction, sustainability, etc.). Please choose a better line of work!

]]> By: mememine69http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/09/09/is-gov-perry-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-62194 mememine69 Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:54:03 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10672#comment-62194 Climatologists are the abusive priests of science and scientists don’t forget, poisoned our planet with their pesticides and falsely condemned billions of children to a CO2 death for 25 years of needless panic. There are real consequences for inciting this “climate riot” and those guilty parties will be in jail at some point. We missed getting Bush and his red necked neocons so call the courthouse now! U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 By Phone: Department of Justice Main Switchboard -202-514-2000 Office of the Attorney General Public Comment Line -202-353-1555 Climate Blame was a sick and tragic exaggeration that made fools out of all of us. “Worst Case Scenario Research” did not represent true consensus, it was a “license to exaggerate” and studying the effects of a crisis that hasn’t happened yet amounts to modern day Omen Worship; “The change is all around us…..” Climate blame was a w&t dream for, lab coat consultants, insurance corporations, pandering politicians, unconscionable news editors, lazy copy and paste so called journalists and in historical terms; “Liberalism's Iraq War” of climate WMD lies and fear mongering. Meanwhile, the UN had allowed carbon trading stock markets run by corporations and politicians to trump 3rd world fresh water relief, starvation rescue and 3rd world education for just over 25 years of attempts at climate CONTROL. And since Obama never even mentioned the “crisis” in his February State of the Union Address, it’s fair to say that the new denier is anyone who still thinks we will all vote YES to taxing the air to make the weather colder. When we see the countless thousands of concerned consensus scientists marching in the streets and acting like this is really the “crisis” they say it is, only then will we not accuse them of legal exaggeration. Climatologists are the abusive priests of science and scientists don’t forget, poisoned our planet with their pesticides and falsely condemned billions of children to a CO2 death for 25 years of needless panic.
There are real consequences for inciting this “climate riot” and those guilty parties will be in jail at some point. We missed getting Bush and his red necked neocons so call the courthouse now!
U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001
By Phone: Department of Justice Main Switchboard -202-514-2000
Office of the Attorney General Public Comment Line -202-353-1555
Climate Blame was a sick and tragic exaggeration that made fools out of all of us.
“Worst Case Scenario Research” did not represent true consensus, it was a “license to exaggerate” and studying the effects of a crisis that hasn’t happened yet amounts to modern day Omen Worship; “The change is all around us…..”
Climate blame was a w&t dream for, lab coat consultants, insurance corporations, pandering politicians, unconscionable news editors, lazy copy and paste so called journalists and in historical terms; “Liberalism’s Iraq War” of climate WMD lies and fear mongering.
Meanwhile, the UN had allowed carbon trading stock markets run by corporations and politicians to trump 3rd world fresh water relief, starvation rescue and 3rd world education for just over 25 years of attempts at climate CONTROL. And since Obama never even mentioned the “crisis” in his February State of the Union Address, it’s fair to say that the new denier is anyone who still thinks we will all vote YES to taxing the air to make the weather colder.
When we see the countless thousands of concerned consensus scientists marching in the streets and acting like this is really the “crisis” they say it is, only then will we not accuse them of legal exaggeration.

]]> By: BobRGeologisthttp://www.globalwarming.org/2011/09/09/is-gov-perry-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-62191 BobRGeologist Sat, 10 Sep 2011 06:07:17 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10672#comment-62191 Governor Rick Perry of Texas has demonstrated an overly religious mentality. Hardly surprising from his "Bible Belt" origin. People who believe in the Bible as "gospel truth" are unable to accept the real science of the natural world and believe in the creation story and the impossible physics of Noa's Ark and deny the well established biological principle of Evolution. This leads to fuzzy thinking in decisions like banning the teaching of evolution in schools or pondering over what would God do in a serious political situation. Governor Rick Perry of Texas has demonstrated an overly religious mentality. Hardly surprising from his “Bible Belt” origin. People who believe in the Bible as “gospel truth” are unable to accept the real science of the natural world and believe in the creation story and the impossible physics of Noa’s Ark and deny the well established biological principle of Evolution. This leads to fuzzy thinking in decisions like banning the teaching of evolution in schools or pondering over what would God do in a serious political situation.

]]> By: D Bonsonhttp://www.globalwarming.org/2011/09/09/is-gov-perry-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-62189 D Bonson Fri, 09 Sep 2011 23:43:29 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10672#comment-62189 Mother Jones, the Huffington Post and the UK Guardian are merely clowns commenting on another clown. They are just like Perry, but on the other side of politics.If their left political allies were against catastrophic anthropogenic global warming, they would parrot their master's views accordingly.If a belief in global warming could get him elected, Perry would be preaching the gospel of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming ad nauseum. Mother Jones, the Huffington Post and the UK Guardian are merely clowns commenting on another clown. They are just like Perry, but on the other side of politics.

If their left political allies were against catastrophic anthropogenic global warming, they would parrot their master’s views accordingly.

If a belief in global warming could get him elected, Perry would be preaching the gospel of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming ad nauseum.

]]>