<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Ethanol Advocacy Groups Want More Ethanol</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/09/26/ethanol-advocacy-groups-want-more-ethanol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/09/26/ethanol-advocacy-groups-want-more-ethanol/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Richard Matthews</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/09/26/ethanol-advocacy-groups-want-more-ethanol/comment-page-1/#comment-62519</link> <dc:creator>Richard Matthews</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 11:05:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10843#comment-62519</guid> <description>More ethanol results in higher food costs, more subsidies (tax dollars we don&#039;t have), lower mpg ratings, more environmental destruction, and damage to engines designed to burn gasoline. What&#039;s not to like? Another policy to bribe voters in the corn belt. Obama is intentionally destroying the economy because the result is more people dependent on government which translates into more votes for the Socialist Party.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More ethanol results in higher food costs, more subsidies (tax dollars we don&#8217;t have), lower mpg ratings, more environmental destruction, and damage to engines designed to burn gasoline. What&#8217;s not to like? Another policy to bribe voters in the corn belt.<br /> Obama is intentionally destroying the economy because the result is more people dependent on government which translates into more votes for the Socialist Party.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Crankcase Manufacturers</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/09/26/ethanol-advocacy-groups-want-more-ethanol/comment-page-1/#comment-62479</link> <dc:creator>Crankcase Manufacturers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:58:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10843#comment-62479</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bkiindia.com/diesel-engine-generators-spares-products.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Crankcase Manufacturers&lt;/a&gt; BKI Industries quality crankcase manufacturers and exporters, cam and  crank gear, diesel engine crankcase, crankcase companies in India.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bkiindia.com/diesel-engine-generators-spares-products.php" rel="nofollow">Crankcase Manufacturers</a><br /> BKI Industries quality crankcase manufacturers and exporters, cam and  crank gear, diesel engine crankcase, crankcase companies in India.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: American Citizen</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/09/26/ethanol-advocacy-groups-want-more-ethanol/comment-page-1/#comment-62468</link> <dc:creator>American Citizen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:08:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10843#comment-62468</guid> <description>&quot; It’s quite possible that the future value of having this alternative (in case biofuels happen to take off) would outweigh the immediate cost of an additional $100 to consumers. However, the automobile manufacturer’s are assuredly aware of this argument and are not convinced by it. And because they have spent a lot more time, effort, and money into investigating this issue than I have, I am likely incorrect.&quot;Brian, What you are missing is the quid pro quo the auto manufactures want in CAFE standard relief for making more Flex Fuel Vehicles. They are holding FFVs hostage.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; It’s quite possible that the future value of having this alternative (in case biofuels happen to take off) would outweigh the immediate cost of an additional $100 to consumers. However, the automobile manufacturer’s are assuredly aware of this argument and are not convinced by it. And because they have spent a lot more time, effort, and money into investigating this issue than I have, I am likely incorrect.&#8221;</p><p>Brian, What you are missing is the quid pro quo the auto manufactures want in CAFE standard relief for making more Flex Fuel Vehicles. They are holding FFVs hostage.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Howard Holme</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/09/26/ethanol-advocacy-groups-want-more-ethanol/comment-page-1/#comment-62456</link> <dc:creator>Howard Holme</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:13:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=10843#comment-62456</guid> <description>Ask your members of Congress to co-sponsor the Open Fuel Standard http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.1687: that would have cars run on methanol, ethanol, gasoline, or be biodiesel or electric.  Methanol from natural gas will be the fuel that breaks OPEC, and can create millions of American jobs.  http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/272685/tripling-america-s-fuel-production-robert-zubrin Apparently the manufacturers oppose this because they currently get a major credit from making ethanol flex fuel cars in complying with the CAFE standards, whether or not the cars actually use ethanol.  Maybe the manufacturers need to be bought off with some methanol CAFE standard credit.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask your members of Congress to co-sponsor the Open Fuel Standard<br /> <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.1687" rel="nofollow">http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.1687</a>:<br /> that would have cars run on methanol, ethanol, gasoline, or be biodiesel or electric.  Methanol from natural gas will be the fuel that breaks OPEC, and can create millions of American jobs. <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/272685/tripling-america-s-fuel-production-robert-zubrin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/272685/tripling-america-s-fuel-production-robert-zubrin</a><br /> Apparently the manufacturers oppose this because they currently get a major credit from making ethanol flex fuel cars in complying with the CAFE standards, whether or not the cars actually use ethanol.  Maybe the manufacturers need to be bought off with some methanol CAFE standard credit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/9 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 279/279 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-02-12 05:18:36 --