http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/11/01/green-special-interests-launch-another-sleazy-attack-ad/ Climate Change News & Analysis Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:41:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/11/01/green-special-interests-launch-another-sleazy-attack-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-66084 CEI Podcast for November 23, 2011: The Most Expensive Regulation of All Time? | Inertia Wins! Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:50:13 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=11058#comment-66084 [...] plants. If it passes, the regulation would cost at least ten billion dollars per year to benefit a very small group of people: pregnant women who have subsistence-level income, and eat mostly large fish caught in inland [...] [...] plants. If it passes, the regulation would cost at least ten billion dollars per year to benefit a very small group of people: pregnant women who have subsistence-level income, and eat mostly large fish caught in inland [...]

]]> http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/11/01/green-special-interests-launch-another-sleazy-attack-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-66083 CEI Podcast for November 23, 2011: The Most Expensive Regulation of All Time? Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:49:55 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=11058#comment-66083 [...] plants. If it passes, the regulation would cost at least ten billion dollars per year to benefit a very small group of people: pregnant women who have subsistence-level income, and eat mostly large fish caught in inland [...] [...] plants. If it passes, the regulation would cost at least ten billion dollars per year to benefit a very small group of people: pregnant women who have subsistence-level income, and eat mostly large fish caught in inland [...]

]]> http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/11/01/green-special-interests-launch-another-sleazy-attack-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-66082 November 23, 2011: The Most Expensive Regulation of All Time? | Liberty Week Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:44:57 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=11058#comment-66082 [...] plants. If it passes, the regulation would cost at least ten billion dollars per year to benefit a very small group of people: pregnant women who have subsistence-level income, and eat mostly large fish caught in inland [...] [...] plants. If it passes, the regulation would cost at least ten billion dollars per year to benefit a very small group of people: pregnant women who have subsistence-level income, and eat mostly large fish caught in inland [...]

]]> http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/11/01/green-special-interests-launch-another-sleazy-attack-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-65194 Tom VanAntwerp Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:15:15 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=11058#comment-65194 Looked to me like the baby was eating the arsenic, not mercury. I think you'd need to use a bottle for mercury, since it's liquid at room temperature. Looked to me like the baby was eating the arsenic, not mercury. I think you’d need to use a bottle for mercury, since it’s liquid at room temperature.

]]> http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/11/01/green-special-interests-launch-another-sleazy-attack-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-64857 Myron Mesecke Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:29:31 +0000 http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=11058#comment-64857 And then Green Special Interests turn around and support CFLs that contain mercury. Go figure. And then Green Special Interests turn around and support CFLs that contain mercury. Go figure.

]]>