<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Mark Pennington: Green Leviathan or the Minimal State?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/11/21/mark-pennington-green-leviathan-or-the-minimal-state/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/11/21/mark-pennington-green-leviathan-or-the-minimal-state/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Carbon Credit Project &#124; Reduce Co2 Emissions</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/11/21/mark-pennington-green-leviathan-or-the-minimal-state/comment-page-1/#comment-66068</link> <dc:creator>Carbon Credit Project &#124; Reduce Co2 Emissions</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:18:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=11448#comment-66068</guid> <description>[...] Yesterday’s excerpt from Mark Pennington’s Robust Political Economy showed why it might not be a good idea to trust government with environmental protection. Pennington argued that government has no strong incentive to actually protect the environment, and even if they did, they wouldn’t know the best ways to balance environmental protection with other priorities. Canadian think-tank Environment Probe’s Elizabeth Brubaker’s Property Rights in the Defence of Nature gives many examples of how property rights rather than legislation were used to prevent pollution. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday’s excerpt from Mark Pennington’s Robust Political Economy showed why it might not be a good idea to trust government with environmental protection. Pennington argued that government has no strong incentive to actually protect the environment, and even if they did, they wouldn’t know the best ways to balance environmental protection with other priorities. Canadian think-tank Environment Probe’s Elizabeth Brubaker’s Property Rights in the Defence of Nature gives many examples of how property rights rather than legislation were used to prevent pollution. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Elizabeth Brubaker: Property Rights, Not Legislation, Defend Citizens Against Pollution</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/11/21/mark-pennington-green-leviathan-or-the-minimal-state/comment-page-1/#comment-66062</link> <dc:creator>Elizabeth Brubaker: Property Rights, Not Legislation, Defend Citizens Against Pollution</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:40:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=11448#comment-66062</guid> <description>[...] Not Legislation, Defend Citizens Against Pollutionby David Bier on November 22, 2011in Blog Tweet Yesterday’s excerpt from Mark Pennington’s Robust Political Economy showed why it might not be a good idea to [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not Legislation, Defend Citizens Against Pollutionby David Bier on November 22, 2011in Blog Tweet Yesterday’s excerpt from Mark Pennington’s Robust Political Economy showed why it might not be a good idea to [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/8 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 238/242 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-13 17:23:04 --