<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Fitzgerald: Mugged for the Environment</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/12/14/fitzgerald-mugged-for-the-environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/12/14/fitzgerald-mugged-for-the-environment/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Ben of Houston</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/12/14/fitzgerald-mugged-for-the-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-66414</link> <dc:creator>Ben of Houston</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:27:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=11800#comment-66414</guid> <description>Hanousek&#039;s case, while certainly extreme, isn&#039;t as clear cut as you make it seem. The first 300 feet of pipeline was protected by a railroad tie and sand barrier during work. Hanousek was convicted because when he took over the project, he stopped the practice of covering and protecting the pipeline.  That is the decision that led to the spill. While I definitely question the wisdom of this prosecution, it does have precedent. If by your actions you recklessly cause someone to get killed, you can be   charged with negligent manslaughter. This isn&#039;t as absurd as you present it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hanousek&#8217;s case, while certainly extreme, isn&#8217;t as clear cut as you make it seem. The first 300 feet of pipeline was protected by a railroad tie and sand barrier during work. Hanousek was convicted because when he took over the project, he stopped the practice of covering and protecting the pipeline.  That is the decision that led to the spill. While I definitely question the wisdom of this prosecution, it does have precedent. If by your actions you recklessly cause someone to get killed, you can be   charged with negligent manslaughter. This isn&#8217;t as absurd as you present it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fitzgerald: Mugged for the Environment &#124; JunkScience.com</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/12/14/fitzgerald-mugged-for-the-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-66396</link> <dc:creator>Fitzgerald: Mugged for the Environment &#124; JunkScience.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:44:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=11800#comment-66396</guid> <description>[...] Fitzgerald: Mugged for the Environment &#8211; Most people find the idea of healthy ecosystems and a clean environment to be desirable social goals. After all, the pollution of our collective air, water, or soil resources can potentially affect both our personal health and our individual property values. The broader social question is how do we measure and define environmental harm, and what benchmarks do we use to certify the point at which damage has occurred that adversely affects others. Examples from the regulation of private lands, public lands, endangered species, wetlands, and the record of the Environmental Protection Agency enforcement tactics illustrate how inflexible or misguided policies, relying on warped incentives and enforced by overzealous regulators, can often do more harm than good…. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fitzgerald: Mugged for the Environment &#8211; Most people find the idea of healthy ecosystems and a clean environment to be desirable social goals. After all, the pollution of our collective air, water, or soil resources can potentially affect both our personal health and our individual property values. The broader social question is how do we measure and define environmental harm, and what benchmarks do we use to certify the point at which damage has occurred that adversely affects others. Examples from the regulation of private lands, public lands, endangered species, wetlands, and the record of the Environmental Protection Agency enforcement tactics illustrate how inflexible or misguided policies, relying on warped incentives and enforced by overzealous regulators, can often do more harm than good…. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/8 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 239/243 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-02-12 23:31:05 --