Comments on: Mitt, We Have a Problem

By: jani

jani — Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:12:09 +0000

May be Al Gore will buy you an apartment on planet Olduran from the money he made from carbon credits. These warmists get at least $60 billion a year in subsidies and research funds every year from governments in western world , and you can’t tolerate a $50 million a year spent by these think tanks? That shows you how pathetic your “science” is.

By: Scottar

Scottar — Sat, 14 Jan 2012 05:43:37 +0000

Well I see the AGWers are still drinking the AlGore seminary koolaide on climate change. First of all if you cauliflower brained idiots would go beyond the hype that CO2 is allegedly causing the past warming and do some real research, you wouldn’t continue to talk with your foot in your mouths, nasty habit at that.

Here is some real science for you.

http://antigreen.blogspot.com/

The CRU graph. Note that it is calibrated in tenths of a degree Celsius and that even that tiny amount of warming started long before the late 20th century. The horizontal line is totally arbitrary, just a visual trick. The whole graph would be a horizontal line if it were calibrated in whole degrees — thus showing ZERO warming.

Note that the most accelerated warming happened before 1940 when CO2 emissions started to allegedly accelerate due to the industrial ramp-up. So how can you come to the conclusion that humans are the cause of the past warming, warming that repeated 4 time in the past from the last great ice age? Even a 7th grader should see past the logic of that!

You green-necks also exhibit the lack of reason on renewable energy. But I have noticed that some energy mags will take advantage of that for grubmint funding as the president has the green bully-pulpit for renewables. I’m not sure of his motives, but for energy independence it’s pure stupidity, based on a bunch of political hype. But what can you expect from a community organizer, he needs the village idiots to re-elect him.

And I’m not Republican, I’m Independent-Libertarian. Gary Johnson for President, the best solution.

By: desertbound

desertbound — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:24:58 +0000

You’re right about two things here. Republicans are enthusiastic about beating Obama. The crutch here is that they don’t know why. Oh, they may say what they think are the reasons why Obama should be beat, but when asked specifically what Obama has done to them to make their lives so miserable, they can’t name it, or if they try, it’s always complete BS. It’s no different when they all hated Hillary Clinton. They couldn’t say what she did to them, they just hated her. It illustrates quite clearly the power of combining good messaging (true or not) with the inability or unwillingness of voters to think for themselves.

And your statement of “The American public doesn’t view global warming as an important issue—this is especially true for Republicans. ” is only partially true. A majority of Americans DO believe it is an issue. Republicans not so much. Again it’s all because of the inability of Americans (mostly Republicans) who can’t or won’t think for themselves. There case for anthropogenic-caused climate change is as solid as the proven dangers behind tobacco use. Let’s differentiate between what the experts are actually telling us vs what Americans believe. The majority of Americans like McDonalds French Fries but that doesn’t make them a good food choice. Chosen ignorance should not be interpreted as fact, something this BS blog perpetuates.

By: Liam Taylor

Liam Taylor — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:29:15 +0000

The amount of lies and inaccuracy this blog tells is disgraceful. You make claims that scientists disagree with these facts but you do not name them or give any evidence. Climate change is real and it’s getting worse as conservative think-tanks like this one spread doubt among the general population who haven’t done enough research to know for themselves. Why not name the contributors to this blog such as Exxon, BP, General Motors and every other big company relying on carbon intensive processes to make their money? Money that will be absolutely useless when we don’t have a planet to live on.

By: mememine69

mememine69 — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:24:47 +0000

Climate Change wasn’t a hoax or a criminal lie, it was an exaggeration and the majority of Liberals are now former believers who are relieved and happy the CO2 crisis wasn’t true after all, not disappointed. The world has walked away from the CO2 mistake and let us not forget that it was the world of “science” that gave us the pesticides that poisoned the planet in the first place. Pollution is real; death for all by CO2 is not, thankfully. If these tens of thousands of concerned “consensus” climate change scientists had actually materialized in the streets protesting and acting like their kids were doomed as well, things may have turned out different. It was a consultant’s wet dream and history will curse us all for this insanity.
Meanwhile, the UN had allowed bank funded and corporate run carbon trading stock markets to trump 3rd world fresh water relief, starvation rescue and 3rd world education for just over 25 years of INSANE attempts at climate CONTROL.