<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Greenhouse Regs for Power Plants: Will EPA Go to Extremes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/01/13/new-greenhouse-regs-for-power-plants-will-epa-go-to-extremes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/01/13/new-greenhouse-regs-for-power-plants-will-epa-go-to-extremes/</link>
	<description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercadee</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/01/13/new-greenhouse-regs-for-power-plants-will-epa-go-to-extremes/comment-page-1/#comment-67113</link>
		<dc:creator>mercadee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=12245#comment-67113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are lots of ways to produce electricity, but to avoid confusion, this article is written, to only explain one type of power plant – coal fired power plant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots of ways to produce electricity, but to avoid confusion, this article is written, to only explain one type of power plant – coal fired power plant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Expect The EPA To Go To Extremes On Power Plant Regulations &#124; EPA Abuse</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/01/13/new-greenhouse-regs-for-power-plants-will-epa-go-to-extremes/comment-page-1/#comment-67100</link>
		<dc:creator>Expect The EPA To Go To Extremes On Power Plant Regulations &#124; EPA Abuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=12245#comment-67100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read more at GlobalWarming.org. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more at GlobalWarming.org. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/01/13/new-greenhouse-regs-for-power-plants-will-epa-go-to-extremes/comment-page-1/#comment-67099</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=12245#comment-67099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under current rules EPA and the States are demanding that BACT for GHG is considered for new permits.  You must even consider CCS.  I&#039;m doing this for small landfill gas to electricity plants that are Title V sources, but not PSD sources for any pollutant or CO2.  The facts that there ARE NO CCS facilities, no transport infrastructure doesn&#039;t affect the regulators.  The regulators have gone nuts.

The EPA has issued rules that effectively shut down new construction of even so-called &quot;green, renewable energy&quot; projects.  You can fail the 1-hour NO2 rule without running your source, if there are enough emergency generators near you.  North Carolina is sitting on an application based rules that are suspended, since they believe that the EPA is making landfill gas a solid waste.

Come out with a new NSPS for power plants?  Yep, these people are seeing how many eggs they can break in 4 years because they know the political will to fix all that does not exist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under current rules EPA and the States are demanding that BACT for GHG is considered for new permits.  You must even consider CCS.  I&#8217;m doing this for small landfill gas to electricity plants that are Title V sources, but not PSD sources for any pollutant or CO2.  The facts that there ARE NO CCS facilities, no transport infrastructure doesn&#8217;t affect the regulators.  The regulators have gone nuts.</p>
<p>The EPA has issued rules that effectively shut down new construction of even so-called &#8220;green, renewable energy&#8221; projects.  You can fail the 1-hour NO2 rule without running your source, if there are enough emergency generators near you.  North Carolina is sitting on an application based rules that are suspended, since they believe that the EPA is making landfill gas a solid waste.</p>
<p>Come out with a new NSPS for power plants?  Yep, these people are seeing how many eggs they can break in 4 years because they know the political will to fix all that does not exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Greenhouse Regs for Power Plants: Will EPA Go to Extremes? &#124; JunkScience.com</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/01/13/new-greenhouse-regs-for-power-plants-will-epa-go-to-extremes/comment-page-1/#comment-67096</link>
		<dc:creator>New Greenhouse Regs for Power Plants: Will EPA Go to Extremes? &#124; JunkScience.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=12245#comment-67096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read more at Cooler Heads Share this:PrintEmailMoreStumbleUponTwitterFacebookDiggRedditLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post.   This entry was posted in Cap &amp; Tax, EPA. Bookmark the permalink.    &#8592; Global warming: red-faced climatologist issues grovelling&#160;apology [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more at Cooler Heads Share this:PrintEmailMoreStumbleUponTwitterFacebookDiggRedditLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post.   This entry was posted in Cap &amp; Tax, EPA. Bookmark the permalink.    &larr; Global warming: red-faced climatologist issues grovelling&nbsp;apology [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EPA Web tool shows greenhouse gas culprits &#8211; UPI.com &#124; newzbuff.com</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/01/13/new-greenhouse-regs-for-power-plants-will-epa-go-to-extremes/comment-page-1/#comment-67071</link>
		<dc:creator>EPA Web tool shows greenhouse gas culprits &#8211; UPI.com &#124; newzbuff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=12245#comment-67071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] gas emissions. The emissions come from power plants, oil refineries and other big industrial &#8230;New Greenhouse Regs for Power Plants: Will EPA Go to Extremes?Global Warming (blog)EPA Puts Greenhouse Gas on Interactive MapNJ SpotlightEPA GREENHOUSE GAS [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gas emissions. The emissions come from power plants, oil refineries and other big industrial &#8230;New Greenhouse Regs for Power Plants: Will EPA Go to Extremes?Global Warming (blog)EPA Puts Greenhouse Gas on Interactive MapNJ SpotlightEPA GREENHOUSE GAS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobRGeologist</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/01/13/new-greenhouse-regs-for-power-plants-will-epa-go-to-extremes/comment-page-1/#comment-67035</link>
		<dc:creator>BobRGeologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=12245#comment-67035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here we go again with much ado about nothing. Sequestering CO2 is nothing but a shameful waste  of taxpayers money and EPA regulations a fearful drag on our economy. If Obama persists with this environmental  nonsense during Pleistocene interglacial  #5  (that is today) and preserving our  glacial climate, it will be ineffective and enormously expensive and likely dangerously counterproductive. It will begin with enormous snows in our Arctic that resist melting during cool summers and will require a few thousand years. Our only recourse will be the EPA&#039;s worst dream, a robust greenhouse gas with lots of CO2 in it.  (suggested reading Dr. William Happer, the Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics at Princeton Univ. &quot; The truth about Greenhouse Gases&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go again with much ado about nothing. Sequestering CO2 is nothing but a shameful waste  of taxpayers money and EPA regulations a fearful drag on our economy. If Obama persists with this environmental  nonsense during Pleistocene interglacial  #5  (that is today) and preserving our  glacial climate, it will be ineffective and enormously expensive and likely dangerously counterproductive. It will begin with enormous snows in our Arctic that resist melting during cool summers and will require a few thousand years. Our only recourse will be the EPA&#8217;s worst dream, a robust greenhouse gas with lots of CO2 in it.  (suggested reading Dr. William Happer, the Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics at Princeton Univ. &#8221; The truth about Greenhouse Gases&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 11/24 queries in 0.023 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 313/342 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-05-15 20:33:47 by W3 Total Cache --