<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Stolen Heartland Documents: DeSmog Blog Keeps Blowing Smoke</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/21/stolen-heartland-documents-desmog-blog-keeps-blowing-smoke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/21/stolen-heartland-documents-desmog-blog-keeps-blowing-smoke/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Mickey Reno</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/21/stolen-heartland-documents-desmog-blog-keeps-blowing-smoke/comment-page-1/#comment-68514</link> <dc:creator>Mickey Reno</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13123#comment-68514</guid> <description>A third major distinction between Climategate and Fakegate, is that 3) the most embarrassing statements in the Climategate e-mails were actually written by the people listed as their authors. In Fakegate, the most embarrassing document was written by a lying, thieving, misrepresenting, political opponent, trying to impersonate  and misrepresent his &quot;enemies&quot; with false and scurrilous statements.And a fourth 4) Climategate was shunned by the media for a long time, because they didn&#039;t want to believe their cult&#039;s leaders could ever do anything wrong or commit scientific malpractice, whereas in this case, the FORGED document was seized upon immediately, and propagated by the Alarmist media outlets and &quot;friendly&quot; blogs without any hesitation or journalistic care.Dr. Gleick (I suspect) is beginning to realize the full import and depth of his error. But others, like Richard Littlemore,  Phil Plait and Black at the BBC still don&#039;t realize the damage they&#039;re doing to themselves,  and continue digging. Mark my words, their credibility will be a long time in returning after this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A third major distinction between Climategate and Fakegate, is that 3) the most embarrassing statements in the Climategate e-mails were actually written by the people listed as their authors. In Fakegate, the most embarrassing document was written by a lying, thieving, misrepresenting, political opponent, trying to impersonate  and misrepresent his &#8220;enemies&#8221; with false and scurrilous statements.</p><p>And a fourth 4) Climategate was shunned by the media for a long time, because they didn&#8217;t want to believe their cult&#8217;s leaders could ever do anything wrong or commit scientific malpractice, whereas in this case, the FORGED document was seized upon immediately, and propagated by the Alarmist media outlets and &#8220;friendly&#8221; blogs without any hesitation or journalistic care.</p><p>Dr. Gleick (I suspect) is beginning to realize the full import and depth of his error. But others, like Richard Littlemore,  Phil Plait and Black at the BBC still don&#8217;t realize the damage they&#8217;re doing to themselves,  and continue digging. Mark my words, their credibility will be a long time in returning after this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: From Climategate to Fakegate</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/21/stolen-heartland-documents-desmog-blog-keeps-blowing-smoke/comment-page-1/#comment-68497</link> <dc:creator>From Climategate to Fakegate</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:39:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13123#comment-68497</guid> <description>[...] var _sf_startpt=(new Date()).getTime()From Climategate to FakegateStolen Heartland Documents: DeSmog Blog Keeps Blowing SmokeDeSmog Blog&#8217;s Bogus Exposé of the Heartland InstituteWill Markey&#8217;s Keystone Export Ban [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] var _sf_startpt=(new Date()).getTime()From Climategate to FakegateStolen Heartland Documents: DeSmog Blog Keeps Blowing SmokeDeSmog Blog&#8217;s Bogus Exposé of the Heartland InstituteWill Markey&#8217;s Keystone Export Ban [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: On the Heartland Controversy</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/21/stolen-heartland-documents-desmog-blog-keeps-blowing-smoke/comment-page-1/#comment-68495</link> <dc:creator>On the Heartland Controversy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:41:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13123#comment-68495</guid> <description>[...] var _sf_startpt=(new Date()).getTime()Stolen Heartland Documents: DeSmog Blog Keeps Blowing SmokeDeSmog Blog&#8217;s Bogus Exposé of the Heartland InstituteWill Markey&#8217;s Keystone Export Ban [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] var _sf_startpt=(new Date()).getTime()Stolen Heartland Documents: DeSmog Blog Keeps Blowing SmokeDeSmog Blog&#8217;s Bogus Exposé of the Heartland InstituteWill Markey&#8217;s Keystone Export Ban [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: S. Fred Singer</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/21/stolen-heartland-documents-desmog-blog-keeps-blowing-smoke/comment-page-1/#comment-68483</link> <dc:creator>S. Fred Singer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:37:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13123#comment-68483</guid> <description>Marlo You are quite correct about &quot;apples and oranges&quot; One cannot compare Climategate and Fakegate For the former, see the careful compilation by Douglass and Christy at http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/a_climatology_conspiracy.htmlAlso:  Thanks to Fakegate, everyone now knows that the &quot;center of climate change denial&quot;  (NYT Feb 21, 2012) is not financed by Big Oil. And we also learned that (what the NYT calls) &quot;main-stream scientists&quot; are becoming desperate as they run out of arguments to support AGW.  So, it seems that vast sums have flowed from oil companies to climate alarmists, but nothing at all to Heartland.&quot; Read: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/the_heartland_institute_flap.html#ixzz1n1ZqNlUQ</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marlo<br /> You are quite correct about &#8220;apples and oranges&#8221;<br /> One cannot compare Climategate and Fakegate<br /> For the former, see the careful compilation by Douglass and Christy at <a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/a_climatology_conspiracy.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/a_climatology_conspiracy.html</a></p><p>Also:  Thanks to Fakegate, everyone now knows that the &#8220;center of climate change denial&#8221;  (NYT Feb 21, 2012) is not financed by Big Oil.<br /> And we also learned that (what the NYT calls) &#8220;main-stream scientists&#8221; are becoming desperate as they run out of arguments to support AGW.  So, it seems that vast sums have flowed from oil companies to climate alarmists, but nothing at all to Heartland.&#8221;<br /> Read: <a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/the_heartland_institute_flap.html#ixzz1n1ZqNlUQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/the_heartland_institute_flap.html#ixzz1n1ZqNlUQ</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Russell C</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/21/stolen-heartland-documents-desmog-blog-keeps-blowing-smoke/comment-page-1/#comment-68482</link> <dc:creator>Russell C</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:54:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13123#comment-68482</guid> <description>But wait, there’s more: I have written numerous online articles about the long-term smear of skeptic climate scientists, including two right here at GW.org ( http://www.globalwarming.org/author/russell-cook/ ), and the central character in them is anti-skeptic book author Ross Gelbspan. Guess who is the star blogger at Desmogblog? Ross Gelbspan.I detail those troubling ties an how far back they go in an online guest article which appeared 2/19 here: “In Case of Heart[land] Attack, Break Glass” http://junkscience.com/2012/02/19/in-case-of-heartland-attack-break-glass/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But wait, there’s more: I have written numerous online articles about the long-term smear of skeptic climate scientists, including two right here at GW.org ( <a href="http://www.globalwarming.org/author/russell-cook/" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalwarming.org/author/russell-cook/</a> ), and the central character in them is anti-skeptic book author Ross Gelbspan. Guess who is the star blogger at Desmogblog? Ross Gelbspan.</p><p>I detail those troubling ties an how far back they go in an online guest article which appeared 2/19 here: “In Case of Heart[land] Attack, Break Glass” <a href="http://junkscience.com/2012/02/19/in-case-of-heartland-attack-break-glass/" rel="nofollow">http://junkscience.com/2012/02/19/in-case-of-heartland-attack-break-glass/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 297/297 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-02-12 13:29:13 --