<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Climategate to Fakegate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/22/from-climategate-to-fakegate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/22/from-climategate-to-fakegate/</link>
	<description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 07:59:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Con Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/22/from-climategate-to-fakegate/comment-page-1/#comment-68738</link>
		<dc:creator>Con Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 07:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13144#comment-68738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the rigors of scientific discipline,no hypothesis is worthy of any consideration unless it implies the kind of evidence that would prove it wrong.Predictions based on the theory are tested against the facts.How many anomalous results are required to invalidate a proposition?To paraphrase Einstein...a mere one.The last couple of decades are replete with failed global warming predictions.Ergo the Anthropogenic Global Warming Theory has been discredited.BTW,a skeptic is defined as one who will not accept any proposition without prior critical rational analysis.The word is derived from  Greek and translates as &quot;one who thinks&quot;.Under the circumstances,the more skeptics the better]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the rigors of scientific discipline,no hypothesis is worthy of any consideration unless it implies the kind of evidence that would prove it wrong.Predictions based on the theory are tested against the facts.How many anomalous results are required to invalidate a proposition?To paraphrase Einstein&#8230;a mere one.The last couple of decades are replete with failed global warming predictions.Ergo the Anthropogenic Global Warming Theory has been discredited.BTW,a skeptic is defined as one who will not accept any proposition without prior critical rational analysis.The word is derived from  Greek and translates as &#8220;one who thinks&#8221;.Under the circumstances,the more skeptics the better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/22/from-climategate-to-fakegate/comment-page-1/#comment-68636</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13144#comment-68636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something tells me that Dr Robert Davidson has as little integrity as Peter Gleick - perhaps his inane comment was the key. . .

When you say &quot;denier,&quot; you have taken the argument out of the realm of science, and dropped it squarely into the realm of religion - a place where it most assuredly does not belong, as religion and science do not mix - kind of like Chlorine and Ammonia.

Congratulations, Dr Robert Davidson, you are now irrelevant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something tells me that Dr Robert Davidson has as little integrity as Peter Gleick &#8211; perhaps his inane comment was the key. . .</p>
<p>When you say &#8220;denier,&#8221; you have taken the argument out of the realm of science, and dropped it squarely into the realm of religion &#8211; a place where it most assuredly does not belong, as religion and science do not mix &#8211; kind of like Chlorine and Ammonia.</p>
<p>Congratulations, Dr Robert Davidson, you are now irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gleick Tragedy &#124; TaJnB &#124; TheAverageJoeNewsBlogg</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/22/from-climategate-to-fakegate/comment-page-1/#comment-68615</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gleick Tragedy &#124; TaJnB &#124; TheAverageJoeNewsBlogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13144#comment-68615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] UPDATE27: 11:25 AM 2/22 Marlo Lewis at Globalwarming.org summarizes in From Climategate to Fakegate [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE27: 11:25 AM 2/22 Marlo Lewis at Globalwarming.org summarizes in From Climategate to Fakegate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gleick Tragedy &#124; Watts Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/22/from-climategate-to-fakegate/comment-page-1/#comment-68614</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gleick Tragedy &#124; Watts Up With That?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13144#comment-68614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] UPDATE27: 11:25 AM 2/22 Marlo Lewis at Globalwarming.org summarizes in From Climategate to Fakegate [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE27: 11:25 AM 2/22 Marlo Lewis at Globalwarming.org summarizes in From Climategate to Fakegate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David and Goliath: Fakegate edition at Catallaxy Files</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/22/from-climategate-to-fakegate/comment-page-1/#comment-68570</link>
		<dc:creator>David and Goliath: Fakegate edition at Catallaxy Files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 23:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13144#comment-68570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] note also see Marlo Lewis &#8211; note the sarcasm. Yep, it’s the small underfunded band of free market think tanks who are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] note also see Marlo Lewis &#8211; note the sarcasm. Yep, it’s the small underfunded band of free market think tanks who are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Robert Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/22/from-climategate-to-fakegate/comment-page-1/#comment-68523</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Robert Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13144#comment-68523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real scandal is what the documents reveal about the Heartland Institute - demonstrating how dreadfully deceitful is the denier industry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real scandal is what the documents reveal about the Heartland Institute &#8211; demonstrating how dreadfully deceitful is the denier industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Climategate to Fakegate &#124; Future World &#124; Scoop.it</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/22/from-climategate-to-fakegate/comment-page-1/#comment-68522</link>
		<dc:creator>From Climategate to Fakegate &#124; Future World &#124; Scoop.it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13144#comment-68522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] background-position: 50% 0px; background-color:#222222; background-repeat : no-repeat; }           www.globalwarming.org  - Today, 3:23 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] background-position: 50% 0px; background-color:#222222; background-repeat : no-repeat; }           <a href="http://www.globalwarming.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalwarming.org</a>  &#8211; Today, 3:23 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who's up for a good laugh? Environmentals please come in here! - Page 9 - Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/22/from-climategate-to-fakegate/comment-page-1/#comment-68517</link>
		<dc:creator>Who's up for a good laugh? Environmentals please come in here! - Page 9 - Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13144#comment-68517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] shutting down institutions like the Heartland Institute that take a different point of view.    From Climategate to Fakegate  ^^  Holy guacamole, now this is how you report the facts.        __________________ Top [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shutting down institutions like the Heartland Institute that take a different point of view.    From Climategate to Fakegate  ^^  Holy guacamole, now this is how you report the facts.        __________________ Top [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lying, stealing and maybe forging, just another day in the global warmist campaign to persuade you - Orange Punch : The Orange County Register</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/22/from-climategate-to-fakegate/comment-page-1/#comment-68516</link>
		<dc:creator>Lying, stealing and maybe forging, just another day in the global warmist campaign to persuade you - Orange Punch : The Orange County Register</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13144#comment-68516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] February 22nd, 2012, 4:58 pm &#183;   &#183; posted by Mark Landsbaum         Tweet  We haven&#8217;t written on this item yet because, well, it&#8217;s so easy to kick &#8216;em when they are down. But we&#8217;ll deign to indulge just this once: The global warmists are at it again. Remember ClimateGate? They call this one FakeGate. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February 22nd, 2012, 4:58 pm &middot;   &middot; posted by Mark Landsbaum         Tweet  We haven&#8217;t written on this item yet because, well, it&#8217;s so easy to kick &#8216;em when they are down. But we&#8217;ll deign to indulge just this once: The global warmists are at it again. Remember ClimateGate? They call this one FakeGate. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Jermey</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/02/22/from-climategate-to-fakegate/comment-page-1/#comment-68515</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Jermey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13144#comment-68515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#039;debate&#039; that Gleick is concerned not to see stifled is the debate about just how many shedloads of money get channelled to AGW alarmists -- many, or very many?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;debate&#8217; that Gleick is concerned not to see stifled is the debate about just how many shedloads of money get channelled to AGW alarmists &#8212; many, or very many?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 12/29 queries in 0.020 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 381/412 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-05-15 08:45:11 by W3 Total Cache --