<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Senate to Consider Pickens-Your-Pocket-Boonedoggle Bill</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/08/senate-to-consider-pickens-your-pocket-boonedoggle-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/08/senate-to-consider-pickens-your-pocket-boonedoggle-bill/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Liberals Make a Stand for Corporate Welfare &#124; The Skeptical Libertarian</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/08/senate-to-consider-pickens-your-pocket-boonedoggle-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-68896</link> <dc:creator>Liberals Make a Stand for Corporate Welfare &#124; The Skeptical Libertarian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:44:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13369#comment-68896</guid> <description>[...] the playing field even further in favor of special interests the same day. 45 Democrats voted for T. Boone Pickens’ payoff plan—otherwise known as the NATGAS Act, which would provide tax subsidies to corporations who [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the playing field even further in favor of special interests the same day. 45 Democrats voted for T. Boone Pickens’ payoff plan—otherwise known as the NATGAS Act, which would provide tax subsidies to corporations who [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Liberals Stand Up For Corporate Welfare</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/08/senate-to-consider-pickens-your-pocket-boonedoggle-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-68895</link> <dc:creator>Liberals Stand Up For Corporate Welfare</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:23:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13369#comment-68895</guid> <description>[...] PricesSuck It Dry: A Modest ProposalSen. Wyden&#8217;s Anti-Keystone Amendment Goes Down in FlamesSenate to Consider Pickens-Your-Pocket-Boonedoggle BillPresident Obama: Rising Gasoline Prices Are Everyone Else’s FaultNo Faith With [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PricesSuck It Dry: A Modest ProposalSen. Wyden&#8217;s Anti-Keystone Amendment Goes Down in FlamesSenate to Consider Pickens-Your-Pocket-Boonedoggle BillPresident Obama: Rising Gasoline Prices Are Everyone Else’s FaultNo Faith With [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CEI Podcast for March 15, 2012: T. Boone Pickens Amendment Fails &#124; Inertia Wins!</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/08/senate-to-consider-pickens-your-pocket-boonedoggle-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-68844</link> <dc:creator>CEI Podcast for March 15, 2012: T. Boone Pickens Amendment Fails &#124; Inertia Wins!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:47:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13369#comment-68844</guid> <description>[...] Senate this week voted down a highway bill amendment that would massively financially benefit natural gas mogul T. Boone Pickens. Senior Fellow Marlo [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Senate this week voted down a highway bill amendment that would massively financially benefit natural gas mogul T. Boone Pickens. Senior Fellow Marlo [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CEI Podcast for March 15, 2012: T. Boone Pickens Amendment Fails</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/08/senate-to-consider-pickens-your-pocket-boonedoggle-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-68843</link> <dc:creator>CEI Podcast for March 15, 2012: T. Boone Pickens Amendment Fails</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:45:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13369#comment-68843</guid> <description>[...] &#183; 0 commentsin Energy, Podcast Tweet Have a listen here.The Senate this week voted down a highway bill amendment that would massively financially benefit natural gas mogul T. Boone Pickens. Senior Fellow Marlo [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &middot; 0 commentsin Energy, Podcast Tweet Have a listen here.The Senate this week voted down a highway bill amendment that would massively financially benefit natural gas mogul T. Boone Pickens. Senior Fellow Marlo [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: March 15, 2012: T. Boone Pickens Amendment Fails&#160;&#124;&#160;Liberty Week</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/08/senate-to-consider-pickens-your-pocket-boonedoggle-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-68842</link> <dc:creator>March 15, 2012: T. Boone Pickens Amendment Fails&#160;&#124;&#160;Liberty Week</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:44:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13369#comment-68842</guid> <description>[...] Senate this week voted down a highway bill amendment that would massively financially benefit natural gas mogul T. Boone Pickens. Senior Fellow Marlo [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Senate this week voted down a highway bill amendment that would massively financially benefit natural gas mogul T. Boone Pickens. Senior Fellow Marlo [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alamo</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/08/senate-to-consider-pickens-your-pocket-boonedoggle-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-68839</link> <dc:creator>Alamo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:26:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13369#comment-68839</guid> <description>The US and North America in general are blessed with huge reserves of natural gas. In addition to that richly abundant resource we in the US have the world&#039;s most highly developed pipeline infrastructure ---its already in place. (A Chinese energy minister stated that if China had the proven nat gas reserves AND the pipelines that we have the Chinese would all be driving on nat gas ---it&#039;s a veritable &quot;no brainer&quot; from their perspective)Consider that we in the US have some 2,000 Tcf (trillion cubic feet). JP Morgan energy analysts suggest that figure is closer to 4,000 Tcf. At current usage rates that 2,000 Tcf is enough nat gas to last over 100 future years. If we converted our transportation systems to compressed natural gas (CNG), we could operate on it for at least the next 50 years --that&#039;s 5 decades or 2 future generations. And during that future period certainly our scientists and engineers can develope, perfect and commercialize the ultimate and virtually inexhaustible national/world energy source. Whether its solar, wind, fusion, geothermal, ocean currents, biomass, etc or a combination of these potential solutions, it&#039;s a doable project.America needs an interim, short term solution other than continuing our devastating dependency and addiction to crude oil ---a commodity that we do not have in anywhere near the equivalent energy reserves we  have in American natural gas. It comes down to deciding if we want to utilize a purely American commodity versus continuing to rely on a world commodity tightly and monopolistically controlled by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries --the hated world oil dictators of OPEC. Our OPEC &quot;friends&quot; are literally bankrupting this nation as we now annually send 450 billion dollars to their ---not our---world petroleum market.This is absurd; it&#039;s an economic insanity and a national ruination. Just consider that the US military and the United States Navy in particular, is primarily responsible for enabling  OPEC to send its crude throughout the world. Our navy protects those international shipping lanes that all crude tankers use. (Various experts suggest that there is some $2.00 to $5.00 or more in national defense costs attached to each and every gallon of gasoline or diesel fuel Americans purchase ---that $3.65 gasoline is actually costing American taxpayers possibly double the pump price in national defense costs alone!As nat gas is a vastly superior internal combustion engine fuel than either gasoline or diesel, it has enormous mechanical and environmental attributes over those crude derivatives. With considerably cleaner emmissions it heightens air quality over them as well.But the overriding reason for utilizing American natural gas in our transportation system is the simple fact that it is ours. By doing so we can materially reduce that annual outflow of some 450 billion dollars each year to the world oil market. By keeping much of that massive amount of national wealth here in our nation, it has the opportunity to provide a superior mode of mobility and allow that money to circulate and multiply the enormous economic benenefit it represents to virtually every aspect of our economy. It would have the real economic potential to add some trillion or more dollars to the American econonomy each year that we now are getting only a single use from --Hauling ourselves,  goods and services from Point A to Point B that costs us 450 billion dollars and then is lost to the &quot;OPEC marketeers&quot;. (With much of it ultimately used to fund worldwide terrorism.)If we could design, build and deliver an atomic bomb in less than 5 years and send and return a man tot he moon in less tha 8 years, certainly this nation is capable of transitioning our transportation system(s) to one fueled by an abundant, clean, cheap and American energy source, American natural gas as well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US and North America in general are blessed with huge reserves of natural gas. In addition to that richly abundant resource we in the US have the world&#8217;s most highly developed pipeline infrastructure &#8212;its already in place. (A Chinese energy minister stated that if China had the proven nat gas reserves AND the pipelines that we have the Chinese would all be driving on nat gas &#8212;it&#8217;s a veritable &#8220;no brainer&#8221; from their perspective)</p><p>Consider that we in the US have some 2,000 Tcf (trillion cubic feet). JP Morgan energy analysts suggest that figure is closer to 4,000 Tcf. At current usage rates that 2,000 Tcf is enough nat gas to last over 100 future years. If we converted our transportation systems to compressed natural gas (CNG), we could operate on it for at least the next 50 years &#8211;that&#8217;s 5 decades or 2 future generations. And during that future period certainly our scientists and engineers can develope, perfect and commercialize the ultimate and virtually inexhaustible national/world energy source.<br /> Whether its solar, wind, fusion, geothermal, ocean currents, biomass, etc or a combination of these potential solutions, it&#8217;s a doable project.</p><p>America needs an interim, short term solution other than continuing our devastating dependency and addiction to crude oil &#8212;a commodity that we do not have in anywhere near the equivalent energy reserves we  have in American natural gas.<br /> It comes down to deciding if we want to utilize a purely American commodity versus continuing to rely on a world commodity tightly and monopolistically controlled by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries &#8211;the hated world oil dictators of OPEC. Our OPEC &#8220;friends&#8221; are literally bankrupting this nation as we now annually send 450 billion dollars to their &#8212;not our&#8212;world petroleum market.</p><p>This is absurd; it&#8217;s an economic insanity and a national ruination. Just consider that the US military and the United States Navy in particular, is primarily responsible for enabling  OPEC to send its crude throughout the world. Our navy protects those international shipping lanes that all crude tankers use. (Various experts suggest that there is some $2.00 to $5.00 or more in national defense costs attached to each and every gallon of gasoline or diesel fuel Americans purchase &#8212;that $3.65 gasoline is actually costing American taxpayers possibly double the pump price in national defense costs alone!</p><p>As nat gas is a vastly superior internal combustion engine fuel than either gasoline or diesel, it has enormous mechanical and environmental attributes over those crude derivatives. With considerably cleaner emmissions it heightens air quality over them as well.</p><p>But the overriding reason for utilizing American natural gas in our transportation system is the simple fact that it is ours. By doing so we can materially reduce that annual outflow of some 450 billion dollars each year to the world oil market. By keeping much of that massive amount of national wealth here in our nation, it has the opportunity to provide a superior mode of mobility and allow that money to circulate and multiply the enormous economic benenefit it represents to virtually every aspect of our economy. It would have the real economic potential to add some trillion or more dollars to the American econonomy each year that we now are getting only a single use from &#8211;Hauling ourselves,  goods and services from Point A to Point B that costs us 450 billion dollars and then is lost to the &#8220;OPEC marketeers&#8221;. (With much of it ultimately used to fund worldwide terrorism.)</p><p>If we could design, build and deliver an atomic bomb in less than 5 years and send and return a man tot he moon in less tha 8 years, certainly this nation is capable of transitioning our transportation system(s) to one fueled by an abundant, clean, cheap and American energy source, American natural gas as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: - Resourceful Earth</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/08/senate-to-consider-pickens-your-pocket-boonedoggle-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-68831</link> <dc:creator>- Resourceful Earth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:43:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13369#comment-68831</guid> <description>[...] An amendment by Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) which would have created an expensive new tax credit for companies that purchase large natural gas vehicles, encouraging the transportation industry to switch over to natural gas from petroleum. It failed 51-47, you can check out how your Senator voted here. This was the much discussed T. Boone Pickens Natural Gas Act, which Resourceful Earth has discussed here. My colleague Marlo Lewis has much more here. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An amendment by Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) which would have created an expensive new tax credit for companies that purchase large natural gas vehicles, encouraging the transportation industry to switch over to natural gas from petroleum. It failed 51-47, you can check out how your Senator voted here. This was the much discussed T. Boone Pickens Natural Gas Act, which Resourceful Earth has discussed here. My colleague Marlo Lewis has much more here. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alice</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/08/senate-to-consider-pickens-your-pocket-boonedoggle-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-68808</link> <dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:54:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13369#comment-68808</guid> <description>I think the point here is about corporate welfare, which even the most strict of socialists will back if it involves reducing CO2 (for which Pickens, Buffet, BP, GE all give thanks).  If your corporation wants lots of taxpayer money, all you have to do is say &quot;we&#039;re green&quot; and voila!  Money.  The &quot;1%&quot; make millions this way and the wall street protestors are all for the programs that hand out that money. As for the price of oil, if Americans would just realize that the middle east does not have 2/3 of the oil and this myth is just used to justify price gouging, the oil prices would stabilize.  It&#039;s clever--pick and unstable area with oil and convince every one all the oil is in this area.  Then any unrest justifies gouging customers with huge price increases.  The more people believe it, the higher you can raise prices.  Americans want to believe and the gas prices show they certainly are falling for this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the point here is about corporate welfare, which even the most strict of socialists will back if it involves reducing CO2 (for which Pickens, Buffet, BP, GE all give thanks).  If your corporation wants lots of taxpayer money, all you have to do is say &#8220;we&#8217;re green&#8221; and voila!  Money.  The &#8220;1%&#8221; make millions this way and the wall street protestors are all for the programs that hand out that money.<br /> As for the price of oil, if Americans would just realize that the middle east does not have 2/3 of the oil and this myth is just used to justify price gouging, the oil prices would stabilize.  It&#8217;s clever&#8211;pick and unstable area with oil and convince every one all the oil is in this area.  Then any unrest justifies gouging customers with huge price increases.  The more people believe it, the higher you can raise prices.  Americans want to believe and the gas prices show they certainly are falling for this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: charles stewart</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/08/senate-to-consider-pickens-your-pocket-boonedoggle-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-68742</link> <dc:creator>charles stewart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:31:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13369#comment-68742</guid> <description>so what, will chrysler, tesla, general motors and ford benefit from natural gas use?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so what, will chrysler, tesla, general motors and ford benefit from natural gas use?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Toes</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/08/senate-to-consider-pickens-your-pocket-boonedoggle-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-68741</link> <dc:creator>Toes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:00:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13369#comment-68741</guid> <description>US consume about 20 million barrels of crude and produce about 8 million.  The Pickens Plan would displace 9 million barrels of crude.  These fueling stations are currently being built but the trucking industry is still resisting.  Congress should pass the Nat Gas Act to encourage trucking companies to convert their long haul tractor trailer trucks to LNG to displace the 9 million barrels of crude consumption.  Problem is republican support for the Koch brothers industries that consume natural gas so each and every republican senator voted against the bill during the last vote.  Far better to use domestic natural gas in US tractor trailer trucks and latter in US trains and still latter to produce 2nd generation ethanol which make ethanol from waste paper, corn cobs, etc. to fuel cars with high compression (more fuel efficient) engines designed to use E85.  This would free US trucks, US trains, and US cars from ever more expensive world crude prices.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US consume about 20 million barrels of crude and produce about 8 million.  The Pickens Plan would displace 9 million barrels of crude.  These fueling stations are currently being built but the trucking industry is still resisting.  Congress should pass the Nat Gas Act to encourage trucking companies to convert their long haul tractor trailer trucks to LNG to displace the 9 million barrels of crude consumption.  Problem is republican support for the Koch brothers industries that consume natural gas so each and every republican senator voted against the bill during the last vote.  Far better to use domestic natural gas in US tractor trailer trucks and latter in US trains and still latter to produce 2nd generation ethanol which make ethanol from waste paper, corn cobs, etc. to fuel cars with high compression (more fuel efficient) engines designed to use E85.  This would free US trucks, US trains, and US cars from ever more expensive world crude prices.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/16 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 375/379 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-13 16:51:27 --