Comments on: EPA Sweeps Another Fracking Fail under the Rug

By: Administrative tyranny has real impacts . . . in Arizona and beyond | Western Free Press

Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:23 +0000

[...] the appropriate governing body. In this case, the EPA filed a lawsuit against an energy company it claimed had contaminated drinking water in Texas through a natural-gas drilling process known as hydrofracturing—which is currently [...]

By: The Environmental Protection Agency’s Arrogant, Abusive Authority

The Environmental Protection Agency’s Arrogant, Abusive Authority — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:24:33 +0000

By: Mark Green

Mark Green — Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:05:33 +0000

William,

Nice post. The EPA’s troubling pattern of seeking maximum publicity for hydraulic fracturing cases before the facts are in serves neither the public nor the environment. These repeated mistakes should be a wake-up for the EPA that changes are needed in their approach. The oil and natural gas industry is committed to producing energy from shale safely and responsibly, and has developed a number of guidelines for safe hydraulic fracturing operations. If you’re interested, I encourage you to view this graphic about fracking and groundwater: http://energytomorrow.org/blog/graphically-speaking-fracking-and-groundwater/#/type/all

Mark, EnergyTomorrow.org

By: Marita Noon on EPA and Amy Berman Jackson Federal Judge | George Jarkesy Radio Show

Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:20:49 +0000

By: The EPA with Easter egg on its face or The Environmental Protection Agency’s Arrogant, Abusive Authority - New Mexico News and Views | New Mexico News and Views

Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:11:15 +0000

By: EPR with Easter egg on its face

EPR with Easter egg on its face — Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:34:47 +0000

By: Lux Libertas – Light and Liberty » The EPA with Easter Egg on Its Face

Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:18:51 +0000

By: BobRGeologist

BobRGeologist — Sun, 08 Apr 2012 07:41:53 +0000

The EPA is our bull in a china shop. They have blundered regulating almost everything they have attempted with overkill. Their biggest blunder is classifying carbon dioxide as pollution. They think it should be diminished by a factor of 95% of the 390 ppm in today’s atmosphere. That would leave our planet virtually free of plant life–like Mars for example and devoid of animal life too, because we all will have starved to death. Real pollution is the black in smoke (soot), elemental carbon.