<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Union of Concerned Scientists Not Very Concerned With Accuracy</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/07/union-of-concerned-scientists-not-very-concerned-with-accuracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/07/union-of-concerned-scientists-not-very-concerned-with-accuracy/</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: JohnFtLaud</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/07/union-of-concerned-scientists-not-very-concerned-with-accuracy/comment-page-1/#comment-69698</link> <dc:creator>JohnFtLaud</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:14:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=14133#comment-69698</guid> <description>Silver! Good follow up! Thanks! The house of cards is falling and that is making those that believe in AGW look foolish.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silver! Good follow up! Thanks! The house of cards is falling and that is making those that believe in AGW look foolish.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: silver price</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/07/union-of-concerned-scientists-not-very-concerned-with-accuracy/comment-page-1/#comment-69695</link> <dc:creator>silver price</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:22:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=14133#comment-69695</guid> <description>Setting that accusation aside, going through the figures it turns out that the Union analysts were counting $325 in corporate matching funds for employee donations to Reason as damning evidence of corporate climate change hypocrisy. I called up Francesca Grifo, the UCS&#039; scientific intergrity officer, to ask her if the report was seriously counting those donations? She replied yes. By the way, it turns out that GE executives and employees had contributed $497,744 to the non-skeptical think tanks. To get the rest of the story read my column.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Setting that accusation aside, going through the figures it turns out that the Union analysts were counting $325 in corporate matching funds for employee donations to Reason as damning evidence of corporate climate change hypocrisy. I called up Francesca Grifo, the UCS&#8217; scientific intergrity officer, to ask her if the report was seriously counting those donations? She replied yes. By the way, it turns out that GE executives and employees had contributed $497,744 to the non-skeptical think tanks. To get the rest of the story read my column.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/9 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 239/246 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-02-12 10:13:28 --