<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attorney Peter Glaser&#8217;s &#8220;Morning After&#8221; Reflections on the D.C. Circuit Court GHG Decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/27/attorney-peter-glasers-morning-after-reflections-on-the-d-c-circuit-court-ghg-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/27/attorney-peter-glasers-morning-after-reflections-on-the-d-c-circuit-court-ghg-decision/</link>
	<description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 07:59:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on the Carbon Tax Cabal</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/27/attorney-peter-glasers-morning-after-reflections-on-the-d-c-circuit-court-ghg-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-70010</link>
		<dc:creator>More on the Carbon Tax Cabal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 22:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=14231#comment-70010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] . . .We Should Be SkepticalRep. Jeff Flake&#8217;s Commonsense Fix for Cellulosic Biofuel FollyAttorney Peter Glaser&#8217;s &#8220;Morning After&#8221; Reflections on the D.C. Circuit Court GHG ...GlobalWarming.orgBlogFeaturesKyoto NegotiationsPoliticsScienceSmall businessvideosCooler Heads [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] . . .We Should Be SkepticalRep. Jeff Flake&#8217;s Commonsense Fix for Cellulosic Biofuel FollyAttorney Peter Glaser&#8217;s &#8220;Morning After&#8221; Reflections on the D.C. Circuit Court GHG &#8230;GlobalWarming.orgBlogFeaturesKyoto NegotiationsPoliticsScienceSmall businessvideosCooler Heads [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup &#124; Watts Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/27/attorney-peter-glasers-morning-after-reflections-on-the-d-c-circuit-court-ghg-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-69853</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup &#124; Watts Up With That?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 22:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=14231#comment-69853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/27/attorney-peter-glasers-morning-after-reflections-on-the-d-c-... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/27/attorney-peter-glasers-morning-after-reflections-on-the-d-c-" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/27/attorney-peter-glasers-morning-after-reflections-on-the-d-c-</a>&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DennisA</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/27/attorney-peter-glasers-morning-after-reflections-on-the-d-c-circuit-court-ghg-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-69838</link>
		<dc:creator>DennisA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 07:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=14231#comment-69838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The EPA has a strong involvement with the IPCC and provides funding to it:
To find out more, check out http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/the_un_states_epa.html

&quot;It has in fact, a major stake in the IPCC process, as former EPA officials, (non-scientists), have been heavily involved in the IPCC reports, with funding from the EPA. Those former employees are also consultants to EPA and have major input to their regulatory findings, including the endangerment finding.&quot;

The input of the EPA into the IPCC reports is demonstrated by the fact that they provide funding for one of the core climate models, MAGICC/SCENGEN.

The EPA authors of the Endangerment Technical Support Document are mainly economists and environmental policy specialists, with qualifications like Masters in International Affairs or Public Policy and Management, although there are a couple of chemists, engineers and one meteorologist. Some are also IPCC authors and many are involved in the production of the proposed regulations.”

The Endangerment Finding Technical Support Document was reviewed and validated by Thomas Karl, Gavin Schmidt and Susan Solomon. It was edited by Joel Smith, a contractor to EPA and NOAA.  Smith worked for the EPA from 1984 to 1992, where he was the deputy director of the Climate Change Division. He was a co-editor of EPA’s Report to Congress: “The Potential Effects of Global Climate Change on the United States,” published in 1989.  He has a BA in Political Science and a Masters in Public Policy.

Also check out:
 http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/lisa_p_jackson_epa_administrator_fulfilling_the_un_mission.html

Sue the EPA – and then work for them
&quot;The revolving door policy has continued and Lisa Jackson boasted at the “40 years of EPA” celebration at Harvard, about the fact that:

“the lead author of  Massachusetts vs. EPA, came to work at the agency she once sued – to see through the work she sued it to do. Lisa Heinzerling, who with my colleagues here today including Gina McCarthy, Bob Perciasepe and Bob Sussman helped EPA follow the science and follow the Supreme Court to finalize our endangerment finding on greenhouse gases last year.”

&quot;From January 2009 to July 2009, Heinzerling served as Senior Climate Policy Counsel to Lisa Jackson and then, from July 2009 to December 2010, she served as Associate Administrator of EPA’s Office of Policy. In 2008, she was a member of President Obama’s EPA transition team. A Professor of Law at Georgetown, she was at one time an assistant attorney general in Massachusetts, specializing in environmental law.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The EPA has a strong involvement with the IPCC and provides funding to it:<br />
To find out more, check out <a href="http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/the_un_states_epa.html" rel="nofollow">http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/the_un_states_epa.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;It has in fact, a major stake in the IPCC process, as former EPA officials, (non-scientists), have been heavily involved in the IPCC reports, with funding from the EPA. Those former employees are also consultants to EPA and have major input to their regulatory findings, including the endangerment finding.&#8221;</p>
<p>The input of the EPA into the IPCC reports is demonstrated by the fact that they provide funding for one of the core climate models, MAGICC/SCENGEN.</p>
<p>The EPA authors of the Endangerment Technical Support Document are mainly economists and environmental policy specialists, with qualifications like Masters in International Affairs or Public Policy and Management, although there are a couple of chemists, engineers and one meteorologist. Some are also IPCC authors and many are involved in the production of the proposed regulations.”</p>
<p>The Endangerment Finding Technical Support Document was reviewed and validated by Thomas Karl, Gavin Schmidt and Susan Solomon. It was edited by Joel Smith, a contractor to EPA and NOAA.  Smith worked for the EPA from 1984 to 1992, where he was the deputy director of the Climate Change Division. He was a co-editor of EPA’s Report to Congress: “The Potential Effects of Global Climate Change on the United States,” published in 1989.  He has a BA in Political Science and a Masters in Public Policy.</p>
<p>Also check out:<br />
 <a href="http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/lisa_p_jackson_epa_administrator_fulfilling_the_un_mission.html" rel="nofollow">http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/lisa_p_jackson_epa_administrator_fulfilling_the_un_mission.html</a></p>
<p>Sue the EPA – and then work for them<br />
&#8220;The revolving door policy has continued and Lisa Jackson boasted at the “40 years of EPA” celebration at Harvard, about the fact that:</p>
<p>“the lead author of  Massachusetts vs. EPA, came to work at the agency she once sued – to see through the work she sued it to do. Lisa Heinzerling, who with my colleagues here today including Gina McCarthy, Bob Perciasepe and Bob Sussman helped EPA follow the science and follow the Supreme Court to finalize our endangerment finding on greenhouse gases last year.”</p>
<p>&#8220;From January 2009 to July 2009, Heinzerling served as Senior Climate Policy Counsel to Lisa Jackson and then, from July 2009 to December 2010, she served as Associate Administrator of EPA’s Office of Policy. In 2008, she was a member of President Obama’s EPA transition team. A Professor of Law at Georgetown, she was at one time an assistant attorney general in Massachusetts, specializing in environmental law.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DennisA</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/27/attorney-peter-glasers-morning-after-reflections-on-the-d-c-circuit-court-ghg-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-69837</link>
		<dc:creator>DennisA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 07:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=14231#comment-69837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sentelle has previously found in favour of the EPA on the Clean Air Act, this was 1988: 
http://federal-circuits.vlex.com/vid/ruckelshaus-monongahela-nacco-38433893

SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:

Petitioners challenge the Environmental Protection Agency&#039;s (EPA) denial of petitions filed by three eastern states under section 126(b) of the Clean Air Act (&quot;the Act&quot;). 42 U.S.C. § 7426(b). We find that the EPA denial of these petitions is based on a reasonable interpretation of the relevant statutes and is not arbitrary or capricious. We therefore deny the petitions, with the exception of the petition of the state of New York which we remand to the Agency for the submission of new data.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sentelle has previously found in favour of the EPA on the Clean Air Act, this was 1988:<br />
<a href="http://federal-circuits.vlex.com/vid/ruckelshaus-monongahela-nacco-38433893" rel="nofollow">http://federal-circuits.vlex.com/vid/ruckelshaus-monongahela-nacco-38433893</a></p>
<p>SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:</p>
<p>Petitioners challenge the Environmental Protection Agency&#8217;s (EPA) denial of petitions filed by three eastern states under section 126(b) of the Clean Air Act (&#8220;the Act&#8221;). 42 U.S.C. § 7426(b). We find that the EPA denial of these petitions is based on a reasonable interpretation of the relevant statutes and is not arbitrary or capricious. We therefore deny the petitions, with the exception of the petition of the state of New York which we remand to the Agency for the submission of new data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attorney Peter Glaser’s “Morning After” Reflections on the D.C. Circuit Court GHG Decision &#124; JunkScience.com</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/27/attorney-peter-glasers-morning-after-reflections-on-the-d-c-circuit-court-ghg-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-69806</link>
		<dc:creator>Attorney Peter Glaser’s “Morning After” Reflections on the D.C. Circuit Court GHG Decision &#124; JunkScience.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=14231#comment-69806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Cooler Heads Share this:PrintEmailMoreStumbleUponTwitterFacebookDiggRedditLike this:LikeBe the first to like this.   This entry was posted in Climate Change, EPA and tagged climate fraud, climate hysteria, co2 emissions, dioxycarbophobia, rogue agency. Bookmark the permalink.    &#8592; Two More Papers On The Important Role Of Regional Circulations on Climate Including Extreme Weather&#160;Events [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cooler Heads Share this:PrintEmailMoreStumbleUponTwitterFacebookDiggRedditLike this:LikeBe the first to like this.   This entry was posted in Climate Change, EPA and tagged climate fraud, climate hysteria, co2 emissions, dioxycarbophobia, rogue agency. Bookmark the permalink.    &larr; Two More Papers On The Important Role Of Regional Circulations on Climate Including Extreme Weather&nbsp;Events [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Pyne</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/27/attorney-peter-glasers-morning-after-reflections-on-the-d-c-circuit-court-ghg-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-69796</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Pyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 04:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=14231#comment-69796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a crock of arrogant, anecdotal, bureaucratic malarkey. Everyone knows the root cause for Global warming is the Sun. The EPA is going to have a hell of time challenging God on that one.  

Look up and wake up people!
Best regards,

Mike Pyne
Germantown, WI]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a crock of arrogant, anecdotal, bureaucratic malarkey. Everyone knows the root cause for Global warming is the Sun. The EPA is going to have a hell of time challenging God on that one.  </p>
<p>Look up and wake up people!<br />
Best regards,</p>
<p>Mike Pyne<br />
Germantown, WI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobRGeologist</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/06/27/attorney-peter-glasers-morning-after-reflections-on-the-d-c-circuit-court-ghg-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-69793</link>
		<dc:creator>BobRGeologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 02:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=14231#comment-69793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a scuebtust who has spent the last 10 years looking at the AGW hypothesis from every conceivable angle and I must conclude that never in the history of science has so much ado made over so little.  First, let&#039;s consider the stage on which this drama is being played.  We are geologically located in Interglacial stage #5 of the cycle of major Pleistocene glaciations  that began affecting the northern hemisphere less than a million years ago. Our climate has been warming by fits and starts since the Little ice age bottomed out around 1300 AD. climaxing around 1940 and it has been wavering  ever since. With glacial ice in our polar regions we have the distinct possibility of lapsing into anotherf glacial epoch and only a robust greenhouse gas could prevent it. So much for the insanity of the EPA&#039;s desire to control greenhousr gases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a scuebtust who has spent the last 10 years looking at the AGW hypothesis from every conceivable angle and I must conclude that never in the history of science has so much ado made over so little.  First, let&#8217;s consider the stage on which this drama is being played.  We are geologically located in Interglacial stage #5 of the cycle of major Pleistocene glaciations  that began affecting the northern hemisphere less than a million years ago. Our climate has been warming by fits and starts since the Little ice age bottomed out around 1300 AD. climaxing around 1940 and it has been wavering  ever since. With glacial ice in our polar regions we have the distinct possibility of lapsing into anotherf glacial epoch and only a robust greenhouse gas could prevent it. So much for the insanity of the EPA&#8217;s desire to control greenhousr gases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 12/25 queries in 0.019 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 330/359 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-05-15 07:37:14 by W3 Total Cache --