Comments on: MIT Study Debunks RFA/Vilsack Claims on Ethanol, Gas Prices

By: Ethanol Added $14.5 Billion to Consumer Motor Fuel Costs in 2011, Study Finds | American Sovereignty PAC

Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:58:09 +0000

[...] the MIT study I reviewed earlier this week, the FarmEcon study rejects the ‘finding’ of Iowa State [...]

By: Ethanol Added $14.5 Billion to Consumer Motor Fuel Costs in 2011, Study Finds

Ethanol Added $14.5 Billion to Consumer Motor Fuel Costs in 2011, Study Finds — Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:54:03 +0000

[...] Date()).getTime()Ethanol Added $14.5 Billion to Consumer Motor Fuel Costs in 2011, Study FindsMIT Study Debunks RFA/Vilsack Claims on Ethanol, Gas PricesGeorge Shultz Endorses Carbon Tax – You Were Surprised?More on the Carbon Tax CabalAEI Hosts [...]

By: Marlo Lewis: MIT Study Debunks RFA/Vilsack Claims on Ethanol, Gas Prices | JunkScience.com

Wed, 18 Jul 2012 06:45:05 +0000

[...] Cooler Heads Share this:PrintEmailMoreStumbleUponTwitterFacebookDiggRedditLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. This entry was posted in Agriculture, Biofuels and tagged burning food, ethanol mandates, gasoline prices, really stupid idea. Bookmark the permalink. ← Brian McGraw: Consumer Preferences Versus Energy Efficiency Regulations [...]

By: BobRGeologist

BobRGeologist — Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:33:44 +0000

Most people do not realize that ethanol does not have as much energy as gasoline and the mixture does not deliver the miles per gallon of pure gasoline. So, the price of the mixture should be lower and not the apparent bargain it would seem. Our real problem is Obama’s catering to the environmental lobby and not permitting us to use our own resources which are still abundant. The refusal to allow the pipeline from the Canadian tar sands is just unbelievable. And it cost us dearly in loss of jobs and force us to import more oil from countries that are NOT OUR FRIENDS. Also using our own resources would benefit our own monster deficit.