<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>GlobalWarming.org &#187; Wayne Crews</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/author/wayne-crews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:16:31 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>English Arch-Druid wants to limit you to two children</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/02/english-arch-druid-wants-to-limit-you-to-two-children/</link> <comments>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/02/english-arch-druid-wants-to-limit-you-to-two-children/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:23:52 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Wayne Crews</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Science]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=9178</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article5627634.ece">Two children should be limit</a>, says this British green &#8220;guru.&#8221;</p><p>What makes him a guru? Saying outrageous things that others should do, but not him personally. He has two children of his own; notice he didn&#8217;t say the limit should be&#8230;</p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article5627634.ece">Two children should be limit</a>, says this British green “guru.”</p><p>What makes him a guru? Saying outrageous things that others should do, but not him personally. He has two children of his own; notice he didn’t say the limit should be <em>one</em> child. He and his kids taking up space and “footprinting” the world is OK, but others are a different matter:</p><blockquote><p>I am unapologetic about asking people to connect up their own responsibility for their total environmental footprint and how they decide to procreate and how many children they think are appropriate….I think we will work our way towards a position that says that having more than two children is irresponsible.</p></blockquote><p>He’s courageous enough to “pronounce the P-word,” but not courageous enough to pronounce judgment upon himself or limit his own “footprint” beyond what he finds personally appropriate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/02/english-arch-druid-wants-to-limit-you-to-two-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Ranking geo-engineering strategies, or “climate hacks” to cool Earth down</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/01/ranking-geo-engineering-strategies-or-%e2%80%9cclimate-hacks%e2%80%9d-to-cool-earth-down/</link> <comments>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/01/ranking-geo-engineering-strategies-or-%e2%80%9cclimate-hacks%e2%80%9d-to-cool-earth-down/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:20:17 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Wayne Crews</dc:creator> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/?p=9088</guid> <description><![CDATA[Numerous approaches have been described to cool what some insist is a warming world (though not over the past few years). In any event, not all the strategies would have the same impact, <a href="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/01/georank.html">so here&#8217;s an interesting ranking of them&#8230;</a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div>Numerous approaches have been described to cool what some insist is a warming world (though not over the past few years). In any event, not all the strategies would have the same impact, <a href="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/01/georank.html">so here&#8217;s an interesting ranking of them from <em>Wired</em></a>. Many ideas are surely kooky, but it definitely makes sense in an energy-starved world&#8212;where most families and children lack basic necessities&#8212;to always look at options apart from carbon constraint.<a href="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/images/2009/01/28/cooling_potential2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter"  src="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/images/2009/01/28/cooling_potential2.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="100%" /></a></div> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/02/01/ranking-geo-engineering-strategies-or-%e2%80%9cclimate-hacks%e2%80%9d-to-cool-earth-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.026 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 263/287 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-13 17:40:55 --