Blog

Newly-elected London Mayor Boris Johnson once famously promised that a vote for his team meant “your wife will get bigger breasts and your chances of driving a BMW M3 will increase”.

John McCain’s tempestuous relationship with his own party will be on full display when the Senate dives into a major global warming debate next week.

The global warming debate arrives in the Senate next week, and it's about time. Finally, the Members will have to vote on something real, as opposed to their buck-passing to courts and regulators, and their easy trashing of President Bush.

Gordon Brown is facing a fresh tax rebellion as Labour MPs demand the repeal of a £200 increase in vehicle excise duty on environmentally unfriendly cars purchased in the past seven years.

Billions of pounds are being wasted in paying industries in developing countries to reduce climate change emissions, according to two analyses of the UN's carbon offsetting programme.

I was watching the Big Oil execs testifying before Congress. That was my first mistake. If memory serves, there was lesbian mud wrestling over on Channel 137, and on the whole that’s less rigged. Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz knew the routine: “I can’t say that there is evidence that you are manipulating the price, but I believe that you probably are. So prove to me that you are not.”

Environment ministers from Group of Eight rich nations and other major greenhouse gas emitters will meet in Japan's western city of Kobe from May 24 to 26 to try to build momentum for talks on issues including long-term targets to reduce the emissions that cause global warming.

Air pollution regulators in the San Francisco Bay area voted overwhelmingly Wednesday to approve new rules that impose fees on businesses for emitting greenhouse gasses.

Paul Chesser, Climate Strategies Watch

After reading "Skeptical Environmentalist" Bjorn Lomborg's opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal today, it's clear that he hasn't digested the "people are bad" global warming alarmism memo. Explaining the "Copenhagen Consensus" economic analysis, he gives examples of how other investments could do more to address pressing problems in the world other than global warming:

Heart disease represents more than a quarter of the death toll in poor countries. Developed nations treat acute heart attacks with inexpensive drugs. Spending $200 million getting these cheap drugs to poor countries would avert 300,000 deaths in a year.

Poor water or sanitation affects more than two billion people and will claim millions of lives this year. One targeted solution would be to build large, multipurpose dams in Africa. 

Building new dams may not be politically correct, but there are massive differences between the U.S. and Europe – where there are sound environmental arguments to halt the construction of large dams and even to decommission some – and countries like Ethiopia which have no water storage facilities, great variability in rainfall, and where dams could be built with relatively few environmental side effects. A single reservoir located in the scarcely inhabited Blue Nile gorge in Ethiopia would cost a breathtaking $3.3 billion. But it would produce large amounts of desperately needed power for Ethiopia, Sudan and Egypt, combat the regional water shortage in times of drought, and expand irrigation. All these benefits would be at least two-and-a-half times as high as the costs.

In each of these areas – and in the areas of air pollution, education and trade barriers – the world's scarce resources could be used to achieve massive amounts of benefits.

If Lomborg is trying to get his message across to the likes of Sierra Club members, he is missing the point, as saving lives is the problem in their eyes:

What We Should Do

Stabilizing population growth worldwide and reducing excessive fuel consumption in the U.S. and other industrialized nations are vital components of slowing, and eventually stopping, global warming. When women have access to education, economic opportunities, family planning and reproductive health services, they have fewer children and increase the spacing between each child. Getting a handle on population growth at home and abroad, and helping low-income nations develop cleanly, are vital steps toward a cleaner, more sustainable future….

Tell our leaders to increase funds for family planning and reproductive health projects at home and abroad, as well as for women's empowerment projects.

A preventive war worked out so well in Iraq that Washington last week launched another. The new preventive war — the government responding forcefully against a postulated future threat — has been declared on behalf of polar bears, the first species whose supposed jeopardy has been ascribed to global warming.