<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>GlobalWarming.org &#187; General Electric</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/tag/general-electric/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:16:31 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt Sours on President Obama</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/20/general-electric-ceo-jeff-immelt-sours-on-president-obama/</link> <comments>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/20/general-electric-ceo-jeff-immelt-sours-on-president-obama/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 21:07:38 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Brian McGraw</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[crony capitalism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[General Electric]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jeff Immelt]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mitt romney]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=13511</guid> <description><![CDATA[Jeff Immelt, chairman and CEO of General Electric, has gone sour on President Obama: Back when he agreed to advise the Obama administration on economics, General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt told friends that he thought it would be good for GE and good for the country. A life-long Republican, Immelt said he believed he could [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/20/general-electric-ceo-jeff-immelt-sours-on-president-obama/" title="Permanent link to General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt Sours on President Obama"><img class="post_image aligncenter" src="http://www.globalwarming.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/immelt.jpg" width="300" height="300" alt="Post image for General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt Sours on President Obama" /></a></p><p>Jeff Immelt, chairman and CEO of General Electric, has gone sour on President Obama:</p><blockquote><p>Back when he agreed to advise the Obama administration on economics, General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt told friends that he thought it would be good for GE and good for the country. A life-long Republican, Immelt said he believed he could at the very least moderate the president’s distinctly anti-business instincts.</p><p>That was three years ago; these days Immelt is telling friends something quite different.</p><p>Sure, GE has managed to feast on federal subsidies, particularly the “green-energy” giveaways that are Obamanomics’ hallmark.</p><p>But Immelt doesn’t think he’s had anywhere near as much luck moderating the president’s fat-cat-bashing, left-leaning economic agenda of taxing businesses and entrepreneurs to pay for government bloat.</p></blockquote><div><blockquote><p>Friends describe Immelt as privately dismayed that, even after three years on the job, President Obama hasn’t moved to the center, but instead further left. The GE CEO, I’m told, is appalled by everything from the president’s class-warfare rhetoric to his continued belief that big government is the key to economic salvation.</p></blockquote></div><div>This is rich. While I happen to agree with Immelt that increasing the size and scope of government is not in our nations best interests, GE/Immelt are an infamous symbol of crony capitalism, where big government and big business get together and rig the game to enrich themselves while the American taxpayers get the shaft. In General Electric&#8217;s case this consists of support for all sorts of <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/beltway-confidential/2010/11/wind-subsidies-arent-working-theyre-just-subsidizing-big">tax credits and subsidies for wind energy production</a>, <a href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/09/15/beer-for-my-horses/">support</a> for the Waxman-Markey cap and trade bill, <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000125&amp;year=2010">spending almost $40 million lobbying in 2010</a>, and the list goes on.<span id="more-13511"></span></div><div></div><div></div><div>Despite his new found anxiety (I wonder if this has anything to do with the prospect of a Romney presidency), Immelt is still the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/advisory-boards/jobs-council/members/immelt">chair</a> of the President&#8217;s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness, and thus a part of the problem:</div><div></div><div><blockquote><p>The President&#8217;s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness (Jobs Council) was created to provide non-partisan advice to the President on continuing to strengthen the Nation&#8217;s economy and ensure the competitiveness of the United States and on ways to create jobs, opportunity, and prosperity for the American people.</p><p>The Jobs Council is made up of members appointed by the President from among distinguished citizens outside the Federal Government, including citizens chosen to serve as representatives of the various sectors of the economy to offer the diverse perspectives of the private sector, employers, and workers on how the Federal Government can best foster growth, competitiveness, innovation, and job creation.</p></blockquote><p>Now, while its not clear that the Council on Jobs and Competitiveness actually has any influence (or has accomplished anything), their <a href="http://www.jobs-council.com/recommendations/summary-of-road-map-to-renewal-report/">recommendations</a> consist of various forms of industrial policy, again set up to funnel money from taxpayers into industry such that industry doesn&#8217;t have to compete in an open market place producing things that consumers want, but rather profit from lavish subsidies, tax credits, and mandates:</p><blockquote><h3>Adopt an “All-In” Strategy on Energy</h3><p>In order to stay competitive, the U.S. must maintain access to abundant and affordable energy while reducing our reliance on foreign imports and moving toward cleaner energy sources. The Jobs Council recommends an “all-in” approach to energy that optimizes all of America’s natural resources, drives innovation and investment, and promotes efficiency to reduce our overall energy dependence.</p><h3>Revitalize the American Manufacturing Sector</h3><p>The U.S. still boasts the most productive, highly-educated manufacturing workforce in the world, unrivaled intellectual property protections, and an advantage in low-cost energy. These strengths at home, and rising costs abroad, give reason to be bullish about American manufacturing. The U.S. can gain three to four percentage points of global value added market share—an ambitious but achievable goal. To accomplish that we must emphasize our traditional manufacturing advantages while taking more aggressive measures in key sectors to take share from global competitors.</p></blockquote><p>Luckily for Immelt, Romney will assuredly welcome him and his lobbying cash with open arms, if he wins the 2012 election. As my colleague Marlo Lewis noted today in an e-mail: &#8220;Immelt wants GE Exceptionalism – big government support for his company, but not big government in general.&#8221;</p><p>&nbsp;</p></div> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/03/20/general-electric-ceo-jeff-immelt-sours-on-president-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Al Gore: the Gift that Keeps on Giving</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/08/17/al-gore-the-gift-that-keeps-on-giving/</link> <comments>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/08/17/al-gore-the-gift-that-keeps-on-giving/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:52:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Myron Ebell</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Al  Gore]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[BP]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Conoco Phillips]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dow Chemical]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Duke Energy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ed Markey]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Entergy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Exelon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category> <category><![CDATA[General Electric]]></category> <category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Generation Investment Management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Henry Waxman]]></category> <category><![CDATA[james hansen]]></category> <category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kleiner Perkins]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Lindsey Granham]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PG&E]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PNM]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Shell]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=6050</guid> <description><![CDATA[Former Vice President Al Gore is the gift that keeps on giving to opponents of global warming alarmism and energy rationing policies. He leads what I think of as the Dream Team: Gore is the public leader; James Hansen is the go-to scientist; Reps. Henry Waxman (D-Beverly Hills) and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) pushed through a [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Former Vice President Al Gore is the gift that keeps on giving to opponents of global warming alarmism and energy rationing policies. He leads what I think of as the Dream Team: Gore is the public leader; James Hansen is the go-to scientist; Reps. Henry Waxman (D-Beverly Hills) and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) pushed through a cap-and-trade bill in the House that killed cap-and-trade; Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) was the main promoter in the Senate; when he dropped the ball, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) was in charge for awhile; and she has now been replaced by Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) with help from Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).</p><p>I used to think that we were just incredibly lucky that the alarmist movement was led by this group of second raters.   I now realize that it isn&#8217;t luck.  Global warming alarmism attracts incompetents, know-nothings, and looney tunes.</p><p>We have missed Al Gore in the debate, but luckily Kerry and Graham were fully up to sinking cap-and-trade in the Senate (not that it had much chance anyway) without any help from the leader of the forces of darkness. So it was good to see that Gore returned this week on a conference call sponsored by Repower America (aka the Alliance for Climate Protection).</p><p>Gore on the conference call acknowledged that cap-and-trade was dead and that the alarmists had lost in 2010.  He bitterly blamed the usual suspects: Big Oil, King Coal, right-wing media, and professional deniers (I believe that is where he would put me and CEI).  This is boilerplate nonsense.  Three of the big five oil companies (BP, Shell, and Conoco Phillips) support cap-and-trade, as well as most of the big electric utilities (Duke Energy, P G and E, Exelon, PNM Resources, Entergy, etc.) and many other major corporations, such as General Electric, Dow Chemical, General Motors, and Ford Motor.  Cap-and-trade died when the American people found out that it was a colossal transfer of wealth from them to corporate special interests (see the list in the previous sentence).</p><p>Gore even said that our system of government was not working as the founders intended it to work.  In fact, in the debate over cap-and-trade the system of checks and balances in the Constitution is working exactly as the founders intended.  It has prevented an elite from hijacking the economy for its own enrichment.</p><p>I can see why Gore is bitter.  His comparatively modest investments in green energy promised to make him a global warming billionaire if cap-and-trade were enacted. Unluckily for him, the American people have said no emphatically.</p><p>[This was originally posted on Politico's Energy Arena <a href="http://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Myron_Ebell_57E298B1-9A19-4C13-9D32-EBC51C0845D1.html">here</a>.]</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/08/17/al-gore-the-gift-that-keeps-on-giving/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Cap and Trade is Dead: Let&#8217;s Hear It for BP, Conoco, and Caterpillar</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/02/17/cap-and-trade-is-dead-lets-hear-it-for-bp-conoco-and-caterpillar/</link> <comments>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/02/17/cap-and-trade-is-dead-lets-hear-it-for-bp-conoco-and-caterpillar/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:46:29 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Myron Ebell</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[BP]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cap and tax]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Caterpillar]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Conoco Phillips]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Duke Energy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category> <category><![CDATA[General Electric]]></category> <category><![CDATA[James Rogers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jeff Immelt]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ken Lay]]></category> <category><![CDATA[US CAP]]></category> <category><![CDATA[US Climate Action Partnership]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5449</guid> <description><![CDATA[The coalition of major corporations hoping to get rich off cap-and-trade legislation started to crack up yesterday when BP America, Conoco Phillips, and Caterpillar dropped out of the U. S. Climate Action Partnership (or US CAP ).  Their defections end the exceedingly small remaining chance that cap-and-trade could be enacted this year. BP America and [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The coalition of major corporations hoping to get rich off cap-and-trade legislation started to crack up yesterday when BP America, Conoco Phillips, and Caterpillar dropped out of the U. S. Climate Action Partnership (or <a href="http://www.us-cap.org/">US CAP </a>).   Their defections end the exceedingly small remaining chance that cap-and-trade could be enacted this year.</p><p>BP America and Conoco Phillips did not pull out because they realized that the Climategate scientific fraud scandal has revealed that global warming alarmism is based on junk science.   Nor did they pull out because they finally recognized that energy-rationing policies will wreck the U. S. economy.   They pulled out when it became clear that they were not going to get rich off the backs of American consumers if the cap-and-trade bill enacted is anything like the specific bills being considered in Congress.</p><p>The Waxman-Markey bill that the House passed last June by a 219 to 212 vote and the Kerry-Boxer bill introduced in the Senate would, as intended by US CAP, raise energy prices for consumers through the roof.   Unfortunately for BP America and Conoco Phillips, the primary beneficiaries of this multi-trillion dollar wealth transfer from consumers to big business would be electric utilities and General Electric.</p><p>In other words, the two oil companies lost the political pushing and shoving match to James Rogers of Duke Energy and Jeffrey Immelt of GE.   That’s no surprise: Immelt has been driving GE into the ground ever since he took over, but he’s a savvy political operator; and Rogers learned how to get to the government trough first from the master, Ken Lay of Enron.   It is worth recalling that Enron Corporation was the leading promoter of the Kyoto Protocol and cap-and-trade before it went spectacularly bankrupt.</p><p>Caterpillar’s case is different.   As the major manufacturer of heavy equipment used in coal mining, Caterpillar must have been asleep when they joined US CAP.   The National Center for Public Policy Research’s <a href="http://www.nationalcenter.org/PR-Caterpillar_USCAP_021710.html">Free Enterprise Project</a> has been gently shaking Caterpillar’s top executives for several years, and perhaps they finally woke up.</p><p>So cap-and-trade is dead.   But other piecemeal energy-rationing policies are still very much alive.   The Environmental Protection Agency is going ahead with regulating greenhouse gas emissions using the Clean Air Act.   Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is working with Senators John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Joseph Lieberman (D-Conn.) on a “compromise” package that can gain bi-partisan support.   Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) has passed a renewable electricity requirement and new building energy efficiency standards out of his committee.</p><p>And big corporations are still circling the trough.   By my count, US CAP still has twenty-three corporate members plus eight environmental pressure groups that front for big business.  And of course, BP America, Conoco Phillips, Caterpillar, and many other companies that don’t belong to US CAP still hope to make money off the “right” sort of policies to raise energy prices.</p><p>The good news is that public opinion has turned decisively against global warming alarmism and energy-rationing.   People have figured out that they, not big business special interests, will end up paying the bills when energy prices, in President Obama’s elegant formulation, “necessarily skyrocket.”   In the November elections, the American people have a lot more votes than James Rogers of Duke Energy or Jim Mulva of Conoco Phillips.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/02/17/cap-and-trade-is-dead-lets-hear-it-for-bp-conoco-and-caterpillar/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/12 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 424/442 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-13 14:10:39 --