<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>GlobalWarming.org &#187; Kentucky</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/tag/kentucky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 23:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>Update on the States</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/03/07/update-on-the-states-3/</link> <comments>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/03/07/update-on-the-states-3/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:57:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>William Yeatman</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Martin O'Malley]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category> <category><![CDATA[nullification]]></category> <category><![CDATA[offshore]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Public Service Company of Colorado]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Public Utilities Commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Xcel Energy]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=7258</guid> <description><![CDATA[Maryland Offshore wind energy is so expensive that even the Democratic-controlled State Legislature is balking at the price tag of Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley’s (D) proposed “Maryland Offshore Wind Energy Act.” The legislation would force the state’s investor owned utilities to minimum 20-year contracts for 400 megawatts to 600 megawatts of offshore wind power. Governor [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/03/07/update-on-the-states-3/" title="Permanent link to Update on the States"><img class="post_image aligncenter" src="http://www.globalwarming.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/us_states_map.jpg" width="400" height="280" alt="Post image for Update on the States" /></a></p><p><strong>Maryland</strong></p><p>Offshore wind energy is so expensive that even the Democratic-controlled State Legislature is balking at the price tag of Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley’s (D) proposed “Maryland Offshore Wind Energy Act.” The legislation would force the state’s investor owned utilities to minimum 20-year contracts for 400 megawatts to 600 megawatts of offshore wind power. Governor O’Malley’s office estimates that the legislation would cost ratepayers about $1.50 a month, but this projection is based on unrealistically optimistic assumptions. Independent analyses peg the costs at up to $9.00 a month. The disparity in estimates has elicited a negative response from O’Malley’s own party in the legislature: the Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/03/AR2011030305856.html">reported</a> this week that two Democratic lawmakers key to the bill’s prospects have suggested they need more time to vet the legislation than is left in this year’s session.</p><p><strong>Kentucky</strong></p><p>By a bipartisan vote of 28 to 10, the Kentucky State Senate last week <a href="http://www.fox19.com/Global/story.asp?S=14157292">passed</a> a resolution exempting the coal industry from EPA regulation, according to the AP. The non-binding resolution, which was introduced by Sen. Brandon Smith (R), is now before the House of Representatives.</p><p><span id="more-7258"></span></p><p><strong>Colorado</strong></p><p>The Colorado Public Utilities Commission <a href="http://energy.i2i.org/2011/03/04/preview-of-puc-deliberations-on-solarrewards-program/">held hearings</a> last Friday on Xcel Energy’s request to lower its “Solar*Rewards” subsidy for installations of photovoltaic panels. This year, Xcel ratepayers are projected to pay 4 percent of total sales (about $100 million) on Solar*Rewards subsidies that will result in .3 percent of generating capacity. The Colorado Solar Energy Industry Association claims that the loss of the subsidy would cause a 75 percent contraction in the state’s solar industry.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/03/07/update-on-the-states-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Update on the States</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/02/22/update-on-the-states/</link> <comments>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/02/22/update-on-the-states/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:23:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>William Yeatman</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category> <category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category> <category><![CDATA[surface coal mining]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=7140</guid> <description><![CDATA[New Hampshire Legislation that would withdraw New Hampshire from a regional energy-rationing scheme gained momentum last week. HB 519, which would pull New Hampshire out of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a cap-and-trade for 10 northeastern States, was approved by the House Science Technology and Energy Committee and endorsed by House Speaker William O&#8217;Brien. Two [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/02/22/update-on-the-states/" title="Permanent link to Update on the States"><img class="post_image alignnone" src="http://www.globalwarming.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/us-states.gif" width="489" height="315" alt="Post image for Update on the States" /></a></p><p>New Hampshire</p><p>Legislation that would withdraw New Hampshire from a regional energy-rationing scheme <a href="http://www.nhbr.com/businessnewsstatenews/909108-257/house-panel-votes-to-quit-rggi.html">gained momentum</a> last week. HB 519, which would pull New Hampshire out of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a cap-and-trade for 10 northeastern States, was approved by the House Science Technology and Energy Committee and endorsed by House Speaker William O&#8217;Brien. Two weeks ago, Governor John Lynch (D) preemptively threatened to veto the bill, but Republicans have a veto-proof majority in the State Legislature, so if they stick together, they can end this energy tax.</p><p>Kentucky</p><p>Outrage at the EPA’s campaign against coal is bipartisan in Kentucky. Last month, a top Democratic lawmaker, Jim Gooch, <a href="http://blogs.courier-journal.com/watchdogearth/2011/01/06/legislator-secession-is-option/">called</a> for “secession” from the green regulatory state. Last week, by an overwhelming bipartisan vote, the State Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee <a href="http://www.kentucky.com/2011/02/17/1639420/ky-lawmakers-want-to-give-symbolic.html#more">passed</a> a bill that would make Kentucky a “sanctuary state” out of reach of the EPA&#8217;s “overreaching regulatory power.” The symbolic legislation is expected to easily win passage in the full Senate.</p><p><span id="more-7140"></span>Wyoming</p><p>Wyoming Governor Matt Mead’s (R) administration two Fridays ago <a href="http://governor.wy.gov/media/pressReleases/Pages/20110211.aspx">filed</a> three petitions in the Tenth Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals challenging rules established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on greenhouse gases. Friday was the deadline to appeal the EPA’s new climate regulations. Wyoming and Texas were the only states to challenge the regulations directly, although Texas, Virginia, and Alabama, with the support of fourteen other states, have a lawsuit pending before the Washington, D.C. Circuit Court that seeks to overturn EPA’s decision to regulate greenhouse gases.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/02/22/update-on-the-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 366/397 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-02-12 21:21:40 --