<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GlobalWarming.org &#187; Ludwig von Mises</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/tag/ludwig-von-mises/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalwarming.org</link>
	<description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 19:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ethanol Mandate: Proud Milestone in the Glorious History of Central Planning</title>
		<link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2013/03/26/ethanol-mandate-proud-milestone-in-the-glorious-history-of-central-planning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.globalwarming.org/2013/03/26/ethanol-mandate-proud-milestone-in-the-glorious-history-of-central-planning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marlo Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Upton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Waxman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ludwig von Mises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NERA Economic Consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=16384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today on National Journal&#8217;s Energy Experts Blog, I post a comment celebrating the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) as a triumph of centralized economic planning. You think I&#8217;m joking? Far from it. The RFS is working at least as well as other central planning schemes! Well, okay, the RFS would be funny if it weren&#8217;t so destructive. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2013/03/26/ethanol-mandate-proud-milestone-in-the-glorious-history-of-central-planning/" title="Permanent link to Ethanol Mandate: Proud Milestone in the Glorious History of Central Planning"><img class="post_image alignleft" src="http://www.globalwarming.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Planned-Chaos.jpg" width="250" height="273" alt="Post image for Ethanol Mandate: Proud Milestone in the Glorious History of Central Planning" /></a>
</p><p>Today on <em>National Journal&#8217;s Energy Experts Blog</em>, I <a href="http://energy.nationaljournal.com/2013/03/biofuels-mandate-defend-reform.php#2315982">post a comment</a> celebrating the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) as a triumph of centralized economic planning. You think I&#8217;m joking? Far from it. The RFS is working at least as well as other central planning schemes!</p>
<p>Well, okay, the RFS would be funny if it weren&#8217;t so destructive. A new <a href="http://www.api.org/~/media/Files/Policy/Alternatives/13-March-RFS/NERA_EconomicImpactsResultingfromRFS2Implementation.pdf">report by NERA Economic Consulting</a> warns that the RFS is heading for a &#8220;death spiral&#8221; &#8212; a vicious circle in which rising fuel costs, declining sales, and dwindling biofuel credits make compliance increasingly &#8220;infeasible.&#8221;</p>
<p>In one scenario analyzed by NERA, the death spiral produces a 30% increase in gasoline prices and a 300% increase in the cost of diesel fuel in 2015. Potential adverse macroeconomic impacts include a “$770 billion decline in GDP and a corresponding reduction in consumption per household of $2,700.” Ludwig von Mises coined a term for such debacles: &#8220;<a href="http://mises.org/document/2714">Planned Chaos</a>.&#8221;<span id="more-16384"></span></p>
<p>Last week, Reps. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) and Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) released the first <a href="http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/sites/default/files/documents/White-Paper-Renewable-Fuel-Standard-Assessment-2013-3-20.pdf">White Paper</a> in a series intended to help policymakers and the public review the RFS in light of the &#8220;wealth of implementation experience&#8221; accumulated over the past five years.</p>
<p>After poking fun at the mandate&#8217;s glorious achievements, my post concludes:</p>
<blockquote><p>In all seriousness, Reps. Upton and Waxman are to be commended for launching a reassessment of the RFS. The exercise will be most valuable if policymakers gain a new sense of modesty about their ability to design markets and direct the future of economic evolution.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarming.org/2013/03/26/ethanol-mandate-proud-milestone-in-the-glorious-history-of-central-planning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 14/25 queries in 0.085 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 272/321 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2013-05-15 16:43:28 by W3 Total Cache --