<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>GlobalWarming.org &#187; Rand Paul</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/tag/rand-paul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:16:31 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>Senate Committee Passes Energy Efficiency Standards</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/04/12/senate-committee-passes-energy-efficiency-standards/</link> <comments>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/04/12/senate-committee-passes-energy-efficiency-standards/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:08:20 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Brian McGraw</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Features]]></category> <category><![CDATA[energy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category> <category><![CDATA[light bulb]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category> <category><![CDATA[washing machine]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=7995</guid> <description><![CDATA[Today the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee marked up and approved S. 398, a bill that establishes new efficiency standards for a variety of consumer products: air conditioners, refrigerators, freezers, washers, dryers, outdoor drinking water dispensers, dishwashers, and a number of other appliances. You can certainly trust Congress to micromanage the optimal amount of [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/04/12/senate-committee-passes-energy-efficiency-standards/" title="Permanent link to Senate Committee Passes Energy Efficiency Standards"><img class="post_image aligncenter" src="http://www.globalwarming.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/080106_p08_cartoon.jpg" width="450" height="297" alt="Post image for Senate Committee Passes Energy Efficiency Standards" /></a></p><p>Today the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee marked up and approved <a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s398/show">S. 398</a>, a bill that establishes new efficiency standards for a variety of consumer products: air conditioners, refrigerators, freezers, washers, dryers, outdoor drinking water dispensers, dishwashers, and a number of other appliances. You can certainly trust Congress to micromanage the optimal amount of energy used by hundred&#8217;s of complex small appliances across different industries.</p><p>This bill saw national media coverage earlier this year when Senator Rand Paul <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELDHaeEsNF0">ranted</a> about efficiency standards that have effected toilets and will soon effect light bulbs. It&#8217;s infuriating that <a href="http://www1.eere.energy.gov/office_eere/m/bio_hogan.html">energy bureaucrats</a> can claim that they are in favor of allowing consumers to choose whichever bulb they want, when they are setting bulb efficiency standards that will ban the traditional incandescent bulb. At least be honest about your desire to restrict the choices of consumer and our freedoms.</p><p><em>Politico</em> <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/53030.html">covered</a> today&#8217;s hearing and Paul was unsurprisingly one of the few dissenters. This time Senator Paul offered an amendment that would make the energy efficiency standards voluntary, which failed 16-6 in committee. Here is a short <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNJKO6Pma40">video</a> from Paul&#8217;s office covering the hearing.</p><p>Consumers should be wary when business gets together and supports these types of standards, though the environmentalists often use this as evidence that only &#8216;crazies&#8217; oppose such bipartisan, &#8220;sensible&#8221; legislation. These regulations will increase the cost of these appliances (and the profitability of them), create new competition-crushing barriers to entry, and often bring <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704662604576202212717670514.html">unexpected consequences</a> (and <a href="http://www.openmarket.org/2011/03/11/unintended-consequences-low-flush-toilets/">here</a>). Recall that a number of oil and energy companies supported the Waxman-Markey bill after it went through the Congressional pork factory.</p><p><span id="more-7995"></span>Proponents will also make grandiose <a href="http://www.thegreeneconomy.com/bill-to-boost-efficiency-of-major-consumer-products/">claims</a> about the amount of energy/jobs/money/small children saved from this legislation. These studies almost never consider the efficiency gains that companies might pursue on their own, assuming that the products will remain stagnant in water or energy usage for the rest of time, despite historical evidence (and common sense) to the contrary.</p><p>And who really believes that bureaucrats at the Department of Energy can calculate the appropriate amount of energy efficiency? After all, it&#8217;s not like Americans would prefer a refrigerator which adds $100 to their electric bill per year rather than $50, if everything else is equal. There is a natural incentive for companies to produce efficient products while also considering consumer demand.</p><p><a href="http://www.openmarket.org/2009/02/05/obama%E2%80%99s-new-appliance-efficiency-mandates%E2%80%94consumers-better-run-for-cover/">Here</a> is a previous post from last year on efficiency measures. <a href="http://cei.org/news-releases/senate-committee-considers-raising-efficiency-standards-oblivious-mess-theyve-already-">Here</a> is a CEI press release on today&#8217;s decision. <a href="http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa504.pdf">Here</a> is a 2003 Cato Institute study on appliance efficiency standards from prior decades. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0iCHZcx5ko&amp;feature=player_embedded">Here</a> is Representative Markey making the hilariously inaccurate claim that the GOP was responsible for ruining America&#8217;s domestic auto industry because of their opposition to fuel efficiency standards.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/04/12/senate-committee-passes-energy-efficiency-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Time to Put the REINS on EPA?</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/02/25/time-to-put-the-reins-on-epa/</link> <comments>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/02/25/time-to-put-the-reins-on-epa/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:54:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Marlo Lewis</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Features]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Geoff Davis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[John Locke]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act]]></category> <category><![CDATA[REINS Act]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=7176</guid> <description><![CDATA[EPA’s end-run around democracy is just the most egregious example of a more pervasive disorder. Regulation without representation &#8212; Congress&#8217;s delegation of lawmaking power to non-elected bureaucrats &#8212; is the malady.  The cure is the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act, which would require congressional approval before major agency rules can take effect. Or [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/02/25/time-to-put-the-reins-on-epa/" title="Permanent link to Time to Put the REINS on EPA?"><img class="post_image alignnone" src="http://www.globalwarming.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Horse-Reins.jpg" width="200" height="200" alt="Post image for Time to Put the REINS on EPA?" /></a></p><p>EPA’s <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-environmental-protection-agency%e2%80%99s-end-run-around-democracy/">end-run around democracy</a> is just the most egregious example of a more pervasive disorder. <strong><em>Regulation without representation</em></strong> &#8212; Congress&#8217;s delegation of lawmaking power to non-elected bureaucrats &#8212; is the malady.  The cure is the <a href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s299is/pdf/BILLS-112s299is.pdf">Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act</a>, which would require congressional approval before major agency rules can take effect.</p><p>Or so I argue today in “<a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/put-the-reins-on-epa/?singlepage=true">Put the REINS on EPA</a>,” at Pajamas Media.Com.</p><p>My column harks back to the political philosphy of the American Founders and one of their great teachers, the English philosopher <a href="http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtr11.htm">John Locke</a>, who said:</p><blockquote><p>The legislative cannot transfer the power of making laws to any other hands, for it being but a delegated power from the people, they who have it cannot pass it on to others.</p></blockquote> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/02/25/time-to-put-the-reins-on-epa/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>LibertyWeek 73: Copenhagen and Obamanomics</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/14/libertyweek-73-copenhagen-and-obamanomics/</link> <comments>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/14/libertyweek-73-copenhagen-and-obamanomics/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:41:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Richard Morrison</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kyoto Negotiations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Amy Hoak]]></category> <category><![CDATA[AP]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[biggovt.com]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cei]]></category> <category><![CDATA[classical liberal]]></category> <category><![CDATA[earmarks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fr33]]></category> <category><![CDATA[free markets]]></category> <category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category> <category><![CDATA[individualism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category> <category><![CDATA[limited government]]></category> <category><![CDATA[MarketWatch]]></category> <category><![CDATA[MICHAEL CASEY]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Mike Flynn]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Not Evil Just Wrong]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Paul Samuelson]]></category> <category><![CDATA[personal responsibility]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Phelim McAleer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category> <category><![CDATA[self government]]></category> <category><![CDATA[small government]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Stephen Schneider]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Taxpayers for Common Sense]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tim Carney]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5268</guid> <description><![CDATA[Your hosts Richard Morrison and Jeremy Lott team up with special guest co-host Tim Carney to bring you Episode 73 of the LibertyWeek podcast. We start with happenings at COP-15 in Copenhagen and the suppression of Phelim McAleer&#8217;s Climategate questions (segment runs 0:45-7:00). We end with an interview with Tim Carney, author of the new book [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p class="MsoNormal">Your hosts Richard Morrison and Jeremy Lott team up with special guest co-host Tim Carney to bring you <a href="http://www.libertyweek.org/2009/12/14/episode-73-understanding-obamanomics/">Episode 73 of the LibertyWeek podcast</a>. We start with <span class="status-body"><span class="entry-content">happenings at COP-15 in Copenhagen and the suppression of <span class="tweet-url username">Phelim McAleer&#8217;s Climategate</span> questions (segment runs 0:45-7:00). We end with an interview with Tim Carney, author of the new book <em>Obamanomics: How Barack Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends, Corporate Lobbyists, and Union Bosses</em> (<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Obamanomics-Bankrupting-Enriching-Corporate-Lobbyists/dp/1596986123/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1260817274&amp;sr=8-1">available online</a> and at fine booksellers everywhere).</span></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/14/libertyweek-73-copenhagen-and-obamanomics/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/12 queries in 0.024 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 461/492 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-13 09:12:54 --