<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>GlobalWarming.org &#187; Schwarzenegger</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/tag/schwarzenegger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:16:31 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>Schwarzenegger Is a Climate Cuckoo, Not a Climate Hawk</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/10/28/schwarzenegger-is-a-climate-cuckoo-not-a-climate-hawk/</link> <comments>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/10/28/schwarzenegger-is-a-climate-cuckoo-not-a-climate-hawk/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:46:57 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>William Yeatman</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Andrew Leonard]]></category> <category><![CDATA[climate hawk]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cuckoo]]></category> <category><![CDATA[David Roberts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category> <category><![CDATA[grist]]></category> <category><![CDATA[hoax]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Salon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Schwarzenegger]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=6338</guid> <description><![CDATA[Last week, David Roberts at Grist coined the phrase &#8220;Climate Hawk,&#8221; to describe &#8220;people who understand climate change and support clean energy but do not share the rest of the ideological and sociocultural commitments that define environmentalism as historically understood in the U.S.&#8221; Of course, a &#8220;hawk&#8221; in political jargon has long referred to policymakers [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Last week, <a href="http://www.grist.org/article/2010-10-20-introducing-climate-hawks/">David Roberts at Grist coined the phrase &#8220;Climate Hawk,&#8221;</a> to describe &#8220;people who understand climate change and support clean energy but do not share the rest of the ideological and sociocultural commitments that define environmentalism as historically understood in the U.S.&#8221;</p><p>Of course, a &#8220;hawk&#8221; in political jargon has long referred to policymakers who are bullish on the use of military might to advance American interests. The national security overtones are meant to impart a seriousness to global warming alarmists otherwise conflated with hippy-dippy granola environmentalists. <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2010/10/20/attack_of_the_deadly_climate_hawks/index.html">According to Andrew Leonard</a> at Salon, Roberts&#8217;s term is &#8220;a brilliant jiujitsu move of rhetorical framing.&#8221;</p><p>Roberts&#8217;s new meme was adopted quickly by the green journo beat. Today, for example, both <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2010/10/28/arnold-schwarzenegger-prop-23-climate-hawk-stand-up-against-the-big-oil-companies/">Joe Romm</a> (of Climate Progress) and <a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/10/28/schwarzenegger-disgusting-oil/">Brad Johnson</a> (at the Center for American Progress) refer to California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger as a Climate Hawk in the wake of a recent interview he did with Diane Sawyer, in which he said,</p><blockquote><p>&#8220;We need to go to Washington and say, &#8220;Look what happened. You, because oil companies have spent money against you, they have threatened you, you backed off the energy policy and the environmental policy in Washington.&#8221; What wimps. No guts. I mean, here, you idolize and always celebrate the great warriors, our soldiers, our men and women who go to Iraq and Afghanistan, and they&#8217;re risking their lives to defend this country, and you&#8217;re not even willing to stand up against the oil companies?&#8221;</p></blockquote><p>Those are tough words, but are they appropriate? After all, Schwarzenegger hasn&#8217;t actually implemented any difficult climate policies. Indeed, AB 32, California&#8217;s Global Warming Solutions Act, doesn&#8217;t kick in until after the Governor leaves office. Moreover, Schwarzenegger in 2007 actually tried to delay early action climate policies under AB 32, in order to protect the construction industry, which had been a big donor to his 2006 reelection campaign. What &#8220;guts&#8221; has the Governator evinced?</p><p>Rather than &#8220;climate hawk,&#8221; a more appropriate bird metaphor for Arnold Schwarzenegger is &#8220;Climate Cuckoo.&#8221; The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Cuckoo">Cuckoo</a> is a parasitic bird that lays its eggs in other nests, in order to be reared by other birds. That&#8217;s a pretty good parallel for what the California Governor is doing with respect to climate policy. He helped birth a climate law full of sacrifice that his successor will have to shoulder.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/10/28/schwarzenegger-is-a-climate-cuckoo-not-a-climate-hawk/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>LibertyWeek 74: Copenhagen v. China?</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/29/libertyweek-74-copenhagen-v-china/</link> <comments>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/29/libertyweek-74-copenhagen-v-china/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:56:36 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Richard Morrison</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kyoto Negotiations]]></category> <category><![CDATA[American Reinvestment and Recovery Act]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category> <category><![CDATA[California]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cei]]></category> <category><![CDATA[china]]></category> <category><![CDATA[classical liberal]]></category> <category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category> <category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category> <category><![CDATA[deregulatory stimulus]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Detroit Free Press]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Do As I Say]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fr33]]></category> <category><![CDATA[free markets]]></category> <category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category> <category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category> <category><![CDATA[individualism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category> <category><![CDATA[JOHN WISELY]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Josh Barro]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kwame Kilpatrick]]></category> <category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category> <category><![CDATA[limited government]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Manhattan Institute]]></category> <category><![CDATA[medicaid]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Nick Tuckers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[personal responsibility]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Robert Colombo Jr.]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Schwarzenegger]]></category> <category><![CDATA[self government]]></category> <category><![CDATA[small government]]></category> <category><![CDATA[snowball fight]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Times New Roman]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Toby Harnden]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5313</guid> <description><![CDATA[Richard Morrison, William Yeatman and Ryan Young join forces to bring you Episode 74 of the LibertyWeek podcast. We talk about the COP-15 post-game and China&#8217;s changing reputation with the climate change crowd starting around (7:00).]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Richard Morrison, William Yeatman and Ryan Young join forces to bring you <a href="http://www.libertyweek.org/2009/12/29/episode-74-tsa-under-fire/">Episode 74 of the LibertyWeek podcast</a>. We talk about the COP-15 post-game and China&#8217;s changing reputation with the climate change crowd starting around (7:00).</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/12/29/libertyweek-74-copenhagen-v-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 383/398 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-13 09:03:21 --