<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>GlobalWarming.org &#187; Wyoming</title> <atom:link href="http://www.globalwarming.org/tag/wyoming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.globalwarming.org</link> <description>Climate Change News &#38; Analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:16:31 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>Update on the States</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/02/22/update-on-the-states/</link> <comments>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/02/22/update-on-the-states/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:23:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>William Yeatman</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category> <category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category> <category><![CDATA[surface coal mining]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=7140</guid> <description><![CDATA[New Hampshire Legislation that would withdraw New Hampshire from a regional energy-rationing scheme gained momentum last week. HB 519, which would pull New Hampshire out of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a cap-and-trade for 10 northeastern States, was approved by the House Science Technology and Energy Committee and endorsed by House Speaker William O&#8217;Brien. Two [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/02/22/update-on-the-states/" title="Permanent link to Update on the States"><img class="post_image alignnone" src="http://www.globalwarming.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/us-states.gif" width="489" height="315" alt="Post image for Update on the States" /></a></p><p>New Hampshire</p><p>Legislation that would withdraw New Hampshire from a regional energy-rationing scheme <a href="http://www.nhbr.com/businessnewsstatenews/909108-257/house-panel-votes-to-quit-rggi.html">gained momentum</a> last week. HB 519, which would pull New Hampshire out of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a cap-and-trade for 10 northeastern States, was approved by the House Science Technology and Energy Committee and endorsed by House Speaker William O&#8217;Brien. Two weeks ago, Governor John Lynch (D) preemptively threatened to veto the bill, but Republicans have a veto-proof majority in the State Legislature, so if they stick together, they can end this energy tax.</p><p>Kentucky</p><p>Outrage at the EPA’s campaign against coal is bipartisan in Kentucky. Last month, a top Democratic lawmaker, Jim Gooch, <a href="http://blogs.courier-journal.com/watchdogearth/2011/01/06/legislator-secession-is-option/">called</a> for “secession” from the green regulatory state. Last week, by an overwhelming bipartisan vote, the State Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee <a href="http://www.kentucky.com/2011/02/17/1639420/ky-lawmakers-want-to-give-symbolic.html#more">passed</a> a bill that would make Kentucky a “sanctuary state” out of reach of the EPA&#8217;s “overreaching regulatory power.” The symbolic legislation is expected to easily win passage in the full Senate.</p><p><span id="more-7140"></span>Wyoming</p><p>Wyoming Governor Matt Mead’s (R) administration two Fridays ago <a href="http://governor.wy.gov/media/pressReleases/Pages/20110211.aspx">filed</a> three petitions in the Tenth Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals challenging rules established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on greenhouse gases. Friday was the deadline to appeal the EPA’s new climate regulations. Wyoming and Texas were the only states to challenge the regulations directly, although Texas, Virginia, and Alabama, with the support of fourteen other states, have a lawsuit pending before the Washington, D.C. Circuit Court that seeks to overturn EPA’s decision to regulate greenhouse gases.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarming.org/2011/02/22/update-on-the-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Wyoming Passes Windmill Tax</title><link>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/01/wyoming-passes-windmill-tax/</link> <comments>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/01/wyoming-passes-windmill-tax/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:44:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Myron Ebell</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tax]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windmills]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalwarming.org/?p=5483</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Wyoming House and Senate have passed the nation&#8217;s first tax on wind energy and sent the bill to Governor Dave Freudenthal.  The Democratic Governor proposed the new tax to the Republican-dominated legislature last month and so is almost certain to sign the bill into law. The new excise tax of one dollar per megawatt [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The Wyoming House and Senate have passed the nation&#8217;s first <a href="http://www.trib.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/article_0228e162-cd8b-5fa8-8755-8e1f600fd3f0.html">tax on wind energy</a> and sent the bill to Governor Dave Freudenthal.  The Democratic Governor proposed the new tax to the Republican-dominated legislature last month and so is almost certain to sign the bill into law.</p><p>The new excise tax of one dollar per megawatt hour will begin in 2012 and will apply  to windmills that have been generating electricity for three years or more.  Revenues are to be split 60-40 between counties and the State.</p><p>Amusingly, Denise Bode, CEO of the American Wind Energy Association, complained about the proposed tax on the grounds that it would <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gXNpemg55BNK03Fv7qyWqLVDRfwQD9DRDLD03">discourage wind power production</a>:  &#8220;It is very disturbing to hear that one of the great States for resources wants to tax the industry and discourage the development of jobs in their State.&#8221;  She did not mention that Wyoming already taxes oil, natural gas, and coal production, which is why it doesn&#8217;t levy a personal income tax.  Nor did she mention that wind power receives huge subsidies from federal taxpayers.  The Department of Energy&#8217;s Energy Information Agency estimated in 2008 that wind receives<a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/subsidy2/pdf/chap5.pdf"> $23.37 in federal subsidies per megawatt hour</a>.  So Wyoming has quite a ways to go before it captures the entire federal subsidy.</p><p>It will be interesting to watch how quickly other States follow Wyoming&#8217;s example.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/03/01/wyoming-passes-windmill-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/12 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 328/346 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.globalwarming.org @ 2012-12-13 20:04:43 --