Blog

New research from Australias Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Accounting suggests that the Earths self regulating properties in the face of global warming are greater than previously believed. The research implies that rainfall patterns, evaporation rates, and plant growth have been profoundly modified to reduce greenhouse gases within the Earths atmosphere.

According to the Centres scientists, “As the world warms, on average, it is getting wetter rainfall, on average, is increasing.” They also added, “Contrary to widespread expectations, potential evaporation from the soil and land-based water bodies like lakes is decreasing in most places. This is because the world is cloudier than it used to be.”

The scientists explained that the increased cloudiness not only contributes to a reduction of evaporation, but also more effective plant photosynthesis. In turn, the Earth will grow more plant life, thereby reducing the amount of carbon dioxide within the atmosphere. These carbon sinks, particularly “long-lived, woody plants like trees”, change habitats, ecosystems, biodiversity, and the flows of greenhouse gases, the scientists claimed.

They concluded, “Forests, farms, and grasslandshave the potential to absorb more (greenhouse gases), ameliorating climate change. Properly managed, they could buy time for the worlds people to make major reductions in greenhouse emissions.” They admitted that despite the findings, “There is much we still must discover” (The Australian, May 11)

Scientists explain why killer weather in film ‘The Day After Tomorrow’ is fiction

Contact for Interviews:    
Richard Morrison, 202.331.2273

Washington, D.C., May 12, 2004The upcoming movie, The Day After Tomorrow, depicts the cataclysmic events that supposedly would be triggered by global warming induced climate change.  Under the tagline Where will you be?, The Day After Tomorrow shows harrowing images of New York City covered in snow and ice, the Sydney opera house being consumed by a mammoth tidal wave and Los Angeles being destroyed by tornadoes.  Unfortunately, the blockbuster fails to employ sound science to back up the special effects. 

Scientists around the world have begun to question and counter the scientific facts depicted within the movie.  Attached is a list of scientists that are available to reveal the truth behind the science fiction of The Day After Tomorrow.  The movie is scheduled for release on Memorial Day weekend, May 28th:

Dr. David Legates, Director, Center for Climatic Research at the University of Delaware
(302) 831-4920
legates@udel.edu

Dr. Ian Clark, Professor, Isotope Hydrogeology and Paleoclimatology, Department of Earth Sciences (Arctic specialist), University of Ottawa
(613) 562-5800
idclark@uottawa.ca

Dr. Madhav Khandekar, Environmental Consultant, 25 years with Environment Canada in Meteorology
(905) 940-0105
mkhandekar@rogers.com

Dr. Robert Balling, Director, Office of Climatology at Arizona State University
(480) 965-7533
robert.balling@asu.edu

Dr. Robert E. Davis, Associate Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Virginia, Editor of Climate Research, Chair of the Committee of Biometeorology and Aerobiology of the American Meteorological Society
(434) 924-0579
red3u@virginia.edu

George Taylor, Faculty Member at Oregon State Universitys College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, State Climatologist of Oregon
(541) 737-5705
taylor@coas.oregonstate.edu

Dr. Sallie Baliunas, Enviro-Sci Host
www.techcentralstation.com
(202) 546-4242
sbaliunas@techcentralstation.com

Dr. Christopher Essex, Professor of Applied Mathematics, University of Western Ontario
(519) 661-3649
essex@uwo.ca
 
Dr. Ross McKitrick, Associate Professor of Economics, University of Guelph, Senior Fellow of the Fraser Institute in Vancouver, B.C., Coauthor of the Canadian bestseller Taken By Storm: The Troubled Science, Policy and Politics of Global Warming
(519) 824-4120 x52532
rmckitri@uoguelph.ca
 
Dr. James J. O’Brien, Robert O. Lawton Distinguished Professor, Meteorology & Oceanography, Director, Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State University
(850) 644-4581   
jim.obrien@coaps.fsu.edu
 
Dr. Pat Michaels, professor of Environmental Science, University of Virginia, State Climatologist of Virginia
(434) 924-0549
pjm8x@Virginia.EDU

The forthcoming Hollywood movie, The Day After Tomorrow stars Dennis Quaid as an earnest climatologist trying to save the world from catastrophic global coolingbrought on by burning fossil fuels. The special effects are said to be spectacular, but the film is no more realistic than Planet of the Apes.

One of the movies big dramatic elements is that the meltwater from globally warmed polar ice caps has overwhelmed the Gulf Stream, so London and New York are turning into ice cubes.

The last time such a thing happened was 12,800 years ago, when the last Ice Age ended and we had an extra trillion tons of ice to melt. The Laurentide Ice Sheet then covered all of Canada, and the U.S. into Ohio. Similar ice sheets covered much of northern Europe and Asia. There was so much water tied up in ice that the ocean levels dropped 300 feet. Stone Age hunters walked to America across the Bering Sea with dry feet.

Has anybody noticed an ice sheet a mile thick over Chicago recently?  Where did Hollywood get the extra trillion tons of ice to shoot this movie?

The other problem for Mr. Quaids credibility is that the Gulf Stream isnt what keeps Britain warm. Its the Rocky Mountains.

The textbooks say the Gulf Stream is what keeps Britain from being sub-Arctic, but theyre wrong. Theyre based on nothing more substantial than a statement by a U.S. Navy lieutenant, Matthew Maury in1856.

One of the benign offices of the Gulf Stream is to convey heat from the Gulf of Mexico, where otherwise it would become excessive, and to disperse it in regions beyond the Atlantic for the amelioration of the climates of the British Isles and of all Western Europe, wrote Maury.

He wasnt wrong. He just wasnt very right.

The Gulf Stream does carry heat from the tropics to the shores of Britainin fact, 27,000 times as much heat as UKs powerplants generate. The warm current helps keep London 25 to 35 degrees F warmer than Newfoundland, which is at the same latitude.

However, new climate research shows that only about 10 percent of Britains winter warming comes from the Gulf Stream. Half of the rest comes from the Atlantic Ocean itself, which holds heat longer than the land.

The rest of the warming for Britain is delivered by west-to-east winds from the Americas Rocky Mountains.

Dr. Richard Seager, of Columbia Universitys Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, says, Belief in the benign role of the Gulf Stream is so widespread that it has become folklore.  But Seager and his research team used weather data from the past 50 yearsand a powerful computer model to describe how heat is shifted around the globe. They found the key to Britains climate was the warm wind from southern North America. The American wind is forced into a giant meander as it flows southeast around the Rocky Mountains.

This vast kink in the atmosphere circulation helps to explain the winter temperature contrast across the North Atlantic, says Seager. Winds, going to eastern North America, flow north around the Rockies and carry cold air to New York. The southern air flow moves over the American southwest and on to Europe. When the scientists flattened the U.S. topography by removing the Rockies from their computer models, British winter temperatures fell radicallyand the summer temperatures became suffocatingly hot.

The other big problem for the Quaid movie is that even major, abrupt climate change isnt very dramatic by Hollywood standards.

Icelanders colonized their island about 850 AD, and lived through the Medieval Warming (9001300 AD), which had the highest temperatures the earth has seen in 5,000 years. Then they suffered through the chillingly colder winters of the Little Ice Age (13001850 AD) with their winds and storms coming straight from the Polar Ice Cap.

As of 1917, after 1500 years of constant major climate changes, the Icelanders argued they hadnt seen any! They thought theyd just had periodic bad weather. But theres so much bad weather in the good (warmer) phases of the climate cycle that it takes a century of weather data to reliably spot a bad trend. The Icelanders didnt have thermometersor movies.

DENNIS T. AVERY is a senior fellow for Hudson Institute in Indianapolis and the Director for Global Food Issues (www.cgfi.org).  He was formerly a senior analyst for the U.S. Department of State. 

Readers may write him at Post Office Box 202, Churchville, VA 24421

For Additional Information:
Dr. Roy Spencer, (256) 961-7960
Dr. John Christy, (256) 961-7763
Phillip Gentry, (256) 824-6420

HUNTSVILLE, AL (May 5, 2004) — A new study of global temperature data reports this week the discovery that significant global warming can be found by subtracting from the temperature record more cooling than was actually there.

“You can’t subtract more signal than is there, but that’s what they’ve done,” said Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist in the Earth System Science Center at The University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH). “They’ve subtracted more than is actually there.”

The study in question, by Fu et al., is published this week in Nature. The authors claim to find significant atmospheric warming over the past 25 years when cooling that has taken place in the stratosphere during that time is removed from the tropospheric temperature data gathered by instruments aboard NOAA satellites.

The problem, says Spencer, is that the study uses a negative “weighting” function that removes more stratospheric cooling than actually appears in the data, thus creating a spurious warming signal.

“Simply put, this method over corrects for stratospheric cooling,” said Dr. John Christy, a professor of atmospheric science at UAH and director of the ESSC. “We tried this same technique in the early 1990s but it didn’t work.  Instead, Roy developed a method for accurately removing stratospheric temperatures from the data and we published that in 1992.”

Spencer and Christy were the first to use data from microwave sounding units aboard NOAA satellites to track global temperature trends. Over the past 13 years they have made several corrections to their dataset as different problems have been identified.

The satellite sensors, which have been in service since late November 1978, show a long-term lower atmosphere global warming trend of about 0.08 C (0.14 degrees Fahrenheit) per decade in the past 25 years. This trend has been corroborated by U.S., British and Russian studies comparing the satellite data to temperature data gathered by weather balloons.

— 30 —

Jami

The Marshall Institute put on an event at the National Press Club in Washington, DC today to announce the new book, Adapt Or Die: The science, politics and economics of climate change.

Adapt or Die is a project of the International Policy Network, edited by IPN’s Kendra Okonski. At the event today, Okonski introduced several contributors to the book, who each gave remarks on pressing issues in climate change.

Professor Paul Reiter of the Pasteur Institut in Paris spoke about the history of malaria. Reiter pointed out that malaria was present during the Little Ice Age, at longitudes ranging all the way up to the Arctic Circle. This historical perspective severely undercuts the manic arguments insisting that malaria is a tropical disease poised to explode with any semi-significant climate warming.

Professor Nils-Axel Morner of Stockholm University discussed his research on sea level in the Maldives which contradicts dire predictions of sea-level rise in the the next century. Morners humorous remarks emphasized the need for scientists to not go too far astray from their respective specialties lest their research come off more like a summer blockbuster than a serious scientific effort.

Barun Mitra of the Liberty Institute in New Delhi, India talked about the effect proposed global warming policies could have in forcing “energy poverty” on the worlds poor, leaving them far worse off than under any theorized climate warming where they could afford amenities such as air conditioning

Rounding out the program were IPNs Julian Morris and Indur Goklany, a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. Simon discussed the Kyoto Protocols impact on trade and Goklany focused on the wisdom of mitigation versus adaptation as a strategy for dealing with global warming.

Okonski emphasized that the book does not take any one side on the scientific debate concerning anthropogenic global warming. Adapt or Die is available from Amazon UK and from IPN.

The Cooler Heads Coalition

invites you to a

Congressional and Media Briefing on

The Impacts of Global Warming
Why the Alarmist View is Wrong

A Scientific Appraisal of Tropical Diseases, Sea Level Rise,
Storms and Severe Weather Events, and Species Extinction

                                           
with

Dr. Paul Reiter, Pasteur Institut, Paris
Prof. Nils-Axel Morner, Stockholm University
Dr. Madhav L. Khandekar, Environment Canada (ret.)
Prof. Patrick Michaels, U. Va. & Cato Institute
                                         

Monday, May 3rd
10 AM-1:30 PM
1334, Longworth House Office Building

Refreshments and lunch will be provided.

Reservations are required.
Please RSVP by e-mail to
mebell@cei.org
or by calling Myron Ebell at CEI at (202) 331-2256.

On April 29th, EPA Administrator Mike Leavitt announced that the deadline on the final regulation controlling mercury emissions from power plants would be extended to March 15, 2005 from Dec. 15, 2004.  The Natural Resources Defense Council, which obtained the initial deadline as part of a lawsuit settled by the Clinton administration, offered the extension so that EPA could conduct more analysis on the rule and solicit additional public comment.  Leavitt said EPA would conduct whatever analysis is necessary to ensure the right decision is made and meet the goal of protecting public health in the most effective way possible.

 Leavitt has proposed a mercury trading system, but earlier this month 45 Senators urged him to drop this strategy in favor of a new rule that uses the Clean Air Acts Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) provisions.  This would require state-of-the-art pollution controls on all of the nations 1,100 coal- and oil-fired utilities.  John Kerry was among the 45 senators who asked Leavitt to drop the trading proposal.  With a desire to stick to his plan, Leavitt has rejected this request and, when asked, stated that the presidential elections implications on the regulation would be minimal as [EPA is] moving toward concluding [the] decision in an even-handed and proper way.

 EPAs top air pollution official, Jeff Holmstead, has stated that the technologies needed to meet MACT provisions will not be commercially available by the deadline for utilities to reduce emissions.  Accordingly, Scott Segal, director of the Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, said his group would remain committed to working with EPA to highlight the need for realistic assumptions about the current state of mercury control technology.  An inflexible mercury control program can result in unacceptable fuel-switching from coal to natural gas, hurting American consumers, the elderly, and industrial workers. 

 On the other hand, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said that he would continue to call on EPA to drop its trading plan.  Extending the deadline on this deeply flawed rule moves us back for now from the brink of getting this indefensible plan, but what Administrator Leavitt still needs to do is to withdraw this proposal and produce a new one, grounded in science and in the public’s interest, Leahy said.  We need a mercury plan that honors instead of insults the Clean Air Act. (Greenwire, April 30).

The European Parliament agreed April 20 to the directive expanding the scope of the new emissions trading scheme within the EU from January 1, 2005. 

EUpolitix.com reported, A full sitting of MEPs has backed a report on emissions trading which would mean heavily industrialized EU countries could pay the developing world to pass on its CO2 quotas, dictated by the Kyoto Protocol on climate change.  And, according to amendments made by parliament, the scheme would be compulsory even if the international Kyoto agreement never enters into force.

 Alexander de Roothe Dutch MEP responsible for the proposal in parliamentargues that such a move is necessary for industry to learn how to fight climate change, even without the Russian ratification necessary to make Kyoto legally binding.

 De Roo also commented on a notable omission, Emissions rights from nuclear activities are explicitly excluded.  This legislation is ever greener than the Kyoto Protocol.

 EU Environment Commissioner Margot Wallstrom argued that the directive would be good for business:  The linking of the Kyoto mechanisms to our emissions trading scheme… will reduce costs for the companies participating in emissions trading and provide investors in green technology with the certainty they need.

 In related news, Irish electricity prices are expected to rise by 6 percent initially as a result of the new trading scheme.  According to Ireland.com (Apr. 17), the Irish electricity supply company ESB, has warned of significant rises in electricity prices because of new requirements on carbon dioxide emissions.  The company has claimed that its quota allocation under the proposed CO2 emissions trading system for Ireland will cause its power generation costs to rise by up to 40 percent.

 This would in turn result in domestic prices rising by up to 20 percent if the increased costs of production are passed on in full.  Electricity industry sources have indicated a probable rise for consumers of six per cent in the coming years.

Dr. Patrick J. Michaels, a climatologist at the University of Virginia and state climatologist of Virginia, has questioned the credibility of Nature magazine.  In an article in the April 8 issue the technique of regional climate modeling is dismissed as an unreliable exercise to assess and predict climate changes on small land areas such as the lower 48 states (only 2 percent of the planet). 

 Nevertheless, another article in the same issue uses this defective technique of regional climate modeling to conclude that, The Greenland ice-sheet (covering 0.4 percent of the planet) is likely to be eliminated by anthropogenic climate change unless much more substantial emission reductions are made than those envisaged by the IPCC. 

 In response to these contradictions, Michaels states that, Nature published an alarming and completely misleading article predicting the melting of the entire Greenland ice cap in 1,000 yearsusing a regional climate projection.  He continues, If the models are no good over the U.S., theyre worse over Greenland.  This is nothing but tragic, junk science, published by what is (formerly?) the most prestigious science periodical in the world.  (Washington Times, Apr. 27). 

A press release issued by NGO Carbon Trade Watch on April 19 called for the closure of one of the first funds set up to help developing countries cope with the costs of fighting global warming.  The release read, More than 50 environmental and social justice NGOs and other groups have sent a letter of protest to the World Bank calling for the closure of its new emissions trading fund, The Prototype Carbon Fund.

 In the year of the World Banks 60th anniversary and in the run-up to intense protests in Washington, D.C. at their annual meeting this month, the groups state that the Banks new fund is destructive greenwash and has in fact created extra problems for communities and the environment.  The fund was set up in 1999 to facilitate the new trade in greenhouse gases created under the Kyoto Protocol.  The groups state that so far the fund has exacerbated existing human rights violations and furthered environmental destruction.


One of the funds model projects is located in Brazil and involves the expansion of monoculture eucalyptus plantations owned by the corporation, Plantar.  The plantations were originally established by forcibly evicting geraiszeiros peoples from the land and since then the plantations owners have been accused of creating slave-like conditions.  Furthermore, the plantations have heavily polluted surrounding water sources, thus devastating the livelihoods of local farmers and fisher-folk.

The World Bank will fund the expansion of these plantations in order to generate carbon credits for the international trade in greenhouse gases.  However, on top of the impacts upon the local environment and peoples, there is no guarantee that the project will actually have a permanent positive effect on the climate. 

 Marcelo Calazans from local Brazilian NGO, FASE-ES, states, This and many other projects have terrible negative impacts on local people and environments and it is still unclear if there is any real benefits for the climate.  We believe that the Prototype Carbon Fund should cease operations and close down immediately.